Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:22:20.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progeny: sperm ratios and non-functional sperm in Drosophila melanogaster*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

S. Zimmering  and
G. L. Fowler
S. Zimmering
Affiliation:
Division of Biological and Medical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 U.S.A.
G. L. Fowler
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20006 U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Papers
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , December 1968 , pp. 359 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

REFERENCES

Lindsley, D. L. & Sandler, L. (1958). The meiotic behavior of grossly deleted X chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 43, 547–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novitski, E. & Sandler, I. (1957). Are all products of spermatogenesis functional? Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 43, 318–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacock, W. J. & Erickson, J. (1965). Segregation-distortion and regularly non-functional products of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 51, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, L., Hiraizumi, Y. & Sandler, I. (1959). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. The cytogenetic basis of segregation-distortion. Genetics 44, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandler, L. & Novitski, E. (1957). Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. Am. Nat. 91, no. 857, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmering, S. & Perlman, M. (1962). Modification of abnormal gametic ratios in Drosophila. III. Probable time of the A-type effect in Bar-Stone translocation males. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 4, 333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar