Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:49:15.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The probable mode of gene action in the circling mutants of the mouse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

M. S. Deol
M. S. Deol
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Experimental Genetics Research Unit, Department of Animal Genetics, University College London

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A close examination of reports on circling mutants of the mouse suggested that the commonly held view that the abnormalities of the inner ear are responsible for the waltzing syndrome was probably without foundation. It was thought that a study of kinky (Fuki/+) mice might resolve the doubt, because this mutant has the widest range of abnormalities of the inner ear and behaviour. The results showed that correlation between the two types of abnormalities, although high, was far from complete. This is interpreted as signifying that they are related collaterally rather than lineally. It is argued that they both originate in some primary abnormality of the central nervous system, and circumstantial evidence is presented in support of this argument. It is further suggested that the mode of gene action is essentially similar in all circling mutants, that is the abnormalities of the inner ear are consequent on some early abnormality of the neural tube and the ganglia in the region of the otic vesicle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , June 1966 , pp. 363 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Avery, G., Chow, M. & Holtzer, H. (1956). An experimental analysis of the development of the spinal column. V. Reactivity of chick somites. J. exp. Zool. 132, 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bast, T. H. & Anson, B. J. (1949). The Temporal Bone and the Ear. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Caspari, E. & David, P. R. (1940). The inheritance of a tail abnormality in the house mouse. J. Hered. 31, 427–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deol, M. S. (1954). The anomalies of the labyrinth of the mutants varitint-waddler, shaker-2 and jerker in the mouse. J. Genet. 52, 562–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deol, M. S. (1956). The anatomy and development of the mutants pirouette, shaker-1 and waltzer in the mouse. Proc. R. Soc. B, 145, 206–213.Google ScholarPubMed
Deol, M. S. (1963). The development of the inner ear in mice homozygous for shaker-with-syndactylism. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 11, 493–512.Google ScholarPubMed
Deol, M. S. (1964 a). The abnormalities of the inner ear in kreisler mice. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 12, 475–490.Google ScholarPubMed
Deol, M. S. (1964 b). The origin of the abnormalities of the inner ear in dreher mice. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 12, 727–733.Google ScholarPubMed
Deol, M. S. (1966). The influence of the neural tube on the differentiation of the inner ear in the mammalian embryo. Nature, Lond. 209, 219–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deol, M. S. & Robins, M. W. (1962). The spinner mouse. J. Hered. 53, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. C. & Caspari, E. (1945). A case of neighbouring loci with similar effects. Genetics, 30, 543–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldin, A. (1947). On the neurological effect of some chlorinated tertiary amines. Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs. exp. Biol. 6, 333Google ScholarPubMed
Goldin, A., Noe, H. A., Landing, B. H., Shapiro, D. M. & Goldberg, B. (1948). A neurological syndrome induced by administration of some chlorinated tertiary amines. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 94, 249–261.Google ScholarPubMed
Gbüneberg, H. (1943). Two new mutant genes in the mouse house. J. Genet. 45, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1952). The Genetics of the Mouse, 2nd ed.The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Grüneberg, H., Hallpike, C. W. & Ledoux, A. (1940). Observations on the structure, development and electrical reactions of the internal ear of the shaker-1 mouse. Proc. R. Soc. B, 129, 154–173.Google Scholar
Hertwig, P. (1942). Sechs neue Mutationen bei der Hausmaus in ihrer Bedeutung Für allgemeine Vererbungsfragen. Z. KonstitLehre, 26, 1–21.Google Scholar
Hertwig, P. (1944). Die Genese derHirn-und Gehörorganmissbildungen bei rontgenmutierten Kreisler-Maüsen. Z. KonstitLehre, 28, 327–354.Google Scholar
Lash, J., Holtzer, S. & Holtzer, H. (1957). An experimental analysis of the development of the spinal column. VI. Aspects of cartilage induction. Expl. Cell Res. 13, 292–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Löwenstein, O. (1936). The equilibrium function of the vertebrate labyrinth. Biol. Rev. 11, 113–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, M. F. (1951). Hereditary absence of otoliths in the house mouse. J. Physiol., Lond. 114, 410–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, M. F. (1953). Absence of otoliths in the mouse: an effect of the pallid mutant. J. Genet. 51, 638–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, M. F. (1958). Twirler: a mutant affecting the inner ear of the house mouse. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 6, 105–116.Google ScholarPubMed
Lyon, M. F. (1960). Zigzag: a genetic defect of the horizontal canals in the mouse. Genet. Res. 1, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, C. L. (1950). Comparative Animal Physiology (Ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
Sidman, R. L., Green, M. C. & Appel, S. H. (1965). Catalog of Neurological Mutants of the Mouse. Boston: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, K. F. & Huber, S. A. (1960). Morphology and behavior of waltzer-type mice. J. Morph. 106, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theiler, K. & Gluecksohn-Waelsch, S. (1956). The morphological effects and the development of the fused mutation in the mouse. Anat. Rec. 125, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Truslove, G. M. (1956). The anatomy and development of the fidget mouse. J. Genet. 54, 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar