Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:48:14.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Position effect suppression of ribosomal RNA genes in Drosophila melanogaster: non-autonomous in gynandromorphs?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Jagdeesh Pyati
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Baker (1971) presented genetic evidence that the inviability of In(1)scL8/O and scS1/O males in Drosophila melanogaster is due to position effect suppression of ribosomal RNA cistrons. Although scL8/O and scS1/O males are inviable, scL8/scL8 and scS1/scS1 females are viable. We therefore asked the following question: Is scL8/O or scS1/O viable when part of a gynandromorph? In other words, is position effect suppression of rRNA genes autonomous or non-autonomous in gynandromorphs? In this paper preliminary evidence is presented which suggests that position effect suppression of rRNA cistrons is non-autonomous. The evidence is that scLS/ or scS1/O (male) parts of gynandromorphs are not only viable but normal in appearance.

Type
Short Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

References

REFERENCES

Atwood, K. C. (1969). Some aspects of the bobbed problem in Drosophila. Genetics 61, Supplement 1, 319327.Google ScholarPubMed
Baker, W. K. (1968). Position effect variegation. Advances in Genetics 14, 133169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, W. K. (1971). Evidence for position-effect suppression of ribosomal UNA cistrons in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 68, 24722476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H. (1968). Genetic Variations of Drosophila melanogaster, 471 pp. Washington, D.C: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Ritossa, F. M., Atwood, K. C. & Spiegelman, S. (1966). A molecular explanation of the bobbed mutants of Drosophila as partial deficiencies of ‘ribosomal’ DNA. Genetics 54, 819834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed