Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:39:27.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The population genetics of haplo-diploids and X-linked genes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

P. J. Avery
P. J. Avery
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, Berks
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From the available electrophoretic data, it is clear that haplodiploid insects have a much lower level of genetic variability than diploid insects, a difference that is only partially explained by the social structure of some haplodiploid species. The data comparing X-linked genes and autosomal genes in the same species is much more sparse and little can be inferred from it. This data is compared with theoretical analyses of X-linked genes and genes in haplodiploids. (The theoretical population genetics of X-linked genes and genes in haplodiploids are identical.) X-linked genes under directional selection will be lost or fixed more quickly than autosomal genes as selection acts more directly on X-linked genes and the effective population size is smaller. However, deleterious disease genes, maintained by mutation pressure, will give higher disease incidences at X-linked loci and hence rare mutants are easier to detect at X-linked loci. Considering the forces which can maintain balanced polymorphisms, there are much stronger restrictions on the fitness parameters at X-linked loci than at autosomal loci if genetic variability is to be maintained, and thus fewer polymorphic loci are to be expected on the X-chromosome and in haplodiploids. However, the mutation-random drift hypothesis also leads to the expectation of lower heterozygosity due to the decrease in effective population size. Thus the theoretical results fit in with the data but it is still subject to argument whether selection or mutation-random drift are maintaining most of the genetic variability at X-linked genes and genes in haplodiploids.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 321 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

REFERENCES

Bennett, J. H. (1958). The existence and stability of selectively balanced polymorphisms at a sex-linked locus. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 11, 598–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. H. (1963). Random mating and sex linkage. Journal of Theoretical Biology 4, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkelhammer, R. C. (1983). Intraspecific genetic variation and haplodiploidy, eusociality and Polygyny in the Hymenoptera. Evolution 37, 540–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, J. J. (1981). Co-evolution of haplodiploidy and sex determination in the Hymenoptera. Evolution 35, 568–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannings, C. (1967). Equilibrium, convergence and stability at a sex-linked locus under Natural Selection. Genetics 56, 613–618.Google Scholar
Carson, H. L. (1955). Variation in genetic recombination in natural populations. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 45, (Suppl. 2), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, D. W. (1976). Studies on Metatherian Sex Chromosomes: II. The improbability of a stable balanced polymorphism at an X-linked locus with the paternal X-inactivation system of Kangaroos. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 29, 245–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, D. W., Johnston, P. G., Sharman, G. B. & Vandeberg, J. L. (1977). The control of gene activity on eutherian and metatherian X-chromosomes: a comparison. In Reproduction and Evolution (ed. Calaby, J. H. and Tyndale-Biscoe, C. H.). Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Comparative Biology of Reproduction, Australian Academy of Sciences, Canberra, 81–87.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. W., Johnston, P. G., Vandeberg, J. L., Maynes, G. M. & Chew, G. K. (1979). A comparison of genetic variability at X-linked and autosomal loci in Kangaroos, Man and Drosophila. Genetical Research 33, 243–252.Google Scholar
Crozier, R. H. & Pamilo, P. (1979). Frequency dependent models for X-linked loci in Kangaroos. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 32, 469–474.Google Scholar
Curtsinger, J. W. (1980). On the opportunity for polymorphism with sex-linkage or haplodiploidy. Genetics 96, 995–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grula, J. W. & Taylor, O. R. (1980). The effect of X-chromosome inheritance on mate selection behaviour in the sulfur butterflies, Colias Eurytheme and C. Philodice. Evolution 34, 688–695.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1926). A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Part III. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 23, 363–372.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1935). The rate of spontaneous mutation of a human gene. Journal of Genetics 31, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. & Jayakar, S. D. (1964). Equilibrium under Natural Selection at a sex-linked locus. Journal of Genetics 59, 29–36.Google Scholar
Hedrick, P. W. (1980). Selection in finite populations: III. An experimental examination. Genetics 96, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, J. W. (1979). The time of detection of sex-linked recessives in small populations. Genetical Research 34, 11–17.Google Scholar
Jennings, H. S. (1916). The numerical results of diverse systems of breeding. Genetics 1, 53–89.Google Scholar
Kerr, W. E. & Kerr, L. S. (1952). Concealed variability in the X-chromosome of Drosphila Melanogaster. The American Naturalist 86, 405–408.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1964). Diffusion models in Population Genetics. Journal of Applied Probability 1, 177–232.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. (1964). The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49, 725–738.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. & Ohta, T. (1969 a). The average number of generations until fixation of a mutant gene in a finite population. Genetics 61, 763–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M. & Ohta, T. (1969 b). The average number of generations until extinction of an individual mutant gene in a finite population. Genetics 63, 701–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, L. J. & Selander, R. K. (1979). Population Genetics of Haplodiploid insects. Genetics 92, 1329–1345.Google Scholar
Li, C. C. (1955). Population Genetics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mayo, O. (1976). Neutral alieles at X-linked loci. Human Heredity 26, 263–266.Google Scholar
McKusick, V. A. (1975). Mendelian Inheritance in Man, 4th ed.Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins, University Press.Google Scholar
Nagylaki, T. (1977). Selection in one- and two-locus systems. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 15 (ed. Levin, S.) Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Nagylaki, T. (1979). Selection in dioecious populations. Annals of Human Genetics, London 43, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagylaki, T. (1981). The inbreeding effective population number and the expected homozygosity for an X-linked locus. Genetics 47, 731–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M., Fuerst, P. A. & Chakraborty, R. (1976). Testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by distribution of single locus heterozygosity. Nature 262, 491–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohno, S. (1967). Sex chromosomes and Sex-linked genes. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Pamilo, P. (1979). Genic variation at sex-linked loci: Quantification of regular selection models. Hereditas 91, 129–133.Google Scholar
Powell, J. R. (1975). Protein variation in natural populations of animals. Evolutionary Biology 8, 79–119.Google Scholar
Prakash, S. (1973). Patterns of gene variation in central and marginal populations of Drosophila Robusta. Genetics 75, 347–369.Google Scholar
Prakash, S. (1977 a). Gene polymorphism in natural populations of Drosophila Persimilis. Genetics 85, 513–530.Google Scholar
Prakash, S. (1977 b). Further studies on gene polymorphism in the main-body and geographically isolated populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. Genetics 85, 713–719.Google Scholar
Prakash, S., Lewontin, R. C. & Hubby, J. L. (1969). A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal and isolated populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. Genetics 61, 841–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. (1962). Selection for heterozygotes in small populations. Genetics 47, 1291–1300.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1978). The time of detection of recessive visible genes in small populations. Genetical Research 31, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, F. M. (1976). Variability in the amount of heterozygosity maintained by neutral mutations. Theoretical Population Biology 9, 188–201.Google Scholar
Ward, P. S. (1980). Genetic variation and population differentiation in the Rhytidoponera Impressa group, a species complex of Ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Evolution 34, 1060–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilton, A. (1979). Studies of the nature of chromosomal heterosis in Drosophila Melanogaster. Doctorial Thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1933). Inbreeding and Homozygosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 19, 411–420.Google Scholar
Yang, C-K., Lee, C-T., Chee, C-L. (1966). A stochastic process for sex-linked gene frequency in random-mated small populations (Chinese with English abstract). Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica 6, 118–129.Google Scholar