Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Basso Da Silva, L.
and
Valente, V. L. S.
2001.
Body size and mating success inDrosophila willistoni are uncorrelated under laboratory conditions.
Journal of Genetics,
Vol. 80,
Issue. 2,
p.
77.
Prasad, N. G.
and
Joshi, Amitabh
2003.
What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies onDrosophila melanogaster taught us?.
Journal of Genetics,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
45.
Archer, Margaret A.
Phelan, John P.
Beckman, Kelly A.
and
Rose, Michael R.
2003.
BREAKDOWN IN CORRELATIONS DURING LABORATORY EVOLUTION. II. SELECTION ON STRESS RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS.
Evolution,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 3,
p.
536.
Archer, Margaret A.
Phelan, John P.
Beckman, Kelly A.
and
Rose, Michael R.
2003.
BREAKDOWN IN CORRELATIONS DURING LABORATORY EVOLUTION. II. SELECTION ON STRESS RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS.
Evolution,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 3,
p.
536.
Joshi, Amitabh
2004.
Are bigger flies always better: The role of genes and environment.
Journal of Genetics,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 1,
p.
13.
Wigby, S.
and
Chapman, T.
2006.
No evidence that experimental manipulation of sexual conflict drives premating reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster
.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 4,
p.
1033.
Prasad, N. G.
Bedhomme, S.
Day, T.
and
Chippindale, A. K.
2007.
An Evolutionary Cost of Separate Genders Revealed by Male‐Limited Evolution.
The American Naturalist,
Vol. 169,
Issue. 1,
p.
29.
Borash, Daniel J.
Rose, Michael R.
and
Mueller, Laurence D.
2007.
Mutation Accumulation Affects Male Virility inDrosophilaSelected for Later Reproduction.
Physiological and Biochemical Zoology,
Vol. 80,
Issue. 5,
p.
461.
Garrido, L. Ron
Birchmeier, A.N.
Munilla, S.
and
Cantet, R.J.C.
2008.
Estimation of effective population size using bivariate discrete distributions for modeling family size in beef cattle.
Livestock Science,
Vol. 117,
Issue. 1,
p.
43.
MUELLER, LAURENCE D.
JOSHI, AMITABH
SANTOS, MARTA
and
ROSE, MICHAEL R.
2013.
Effective population size and evolutionary dynamics in outbred laboratory populations of Drosophila.
Journal of Genetics,
Vol. 92,
Issue. 3,
p.
349.
McGuigan, Katrina
and
Blows, Mark W.
2013.
JOINT ALLELIC EFFECTS ON FITNESS AND METRIC TRAITS.
Evolution,
Vol. 67,
Issue. 4,
p.
1131.
Turiegano, Enrique
Monedero, Ignacio
Pita, Miguel
Torroja, Laura
and
Canal, Inmaculada
2013.
Effect of Drosophila melanogaster Female Size on Male Mating Success.
Journal of Insect Behavior,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 1,
p.
89.
Kriesner, Peter
and
Hoffmann, Ary A.
2018.
Rapid spread of aWolbachiainfection that does not affect host reproduction inDrosophila simulanscage populations.
Evolution,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 7,
p.
1475.
Mital, Avani
Sarangi, Manaswini
Nandy, Bodhisatta
Pandey, Neha
and
Joshi, Amitabh
2022.
Shorter effective lifespan in laboratory populations of D. melanogaster might reduce sexual selection.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 4,
Corbel, Quentin
Serra, Manuel
García-Roa, Roberto
and
Carazo, Pau
2022.
Male Adaptive Plasticity Can Explain the Evolution of Sexual Perception Costs.
The American Naturalist,
Vol. 200,
Issue. 3,
p.
E110.