Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:45:31.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixed model analysis of a selection experiment for food intake in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

K. Meyer  and
W. G. Hill
K. Meyer
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN, Scotland
W. G. Hill*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN, Scotland
*
* Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Data from 23 generations of mice selected for increased and reduced appetite were analysed by Restricted Maximum Likelihood fitting an animal model with litters as additional random effects. Traits considered were food intake between 4 and 6 weeks of age adjusted for 4-week body weight (AFI), the selection criterion, and body weight at 6 weeks (6WW). Selection was carried out within families. A high and a low selection line and a control were maintained in each of three replicates. Analyses were performed for each replicate separately taking subsets of the data spanning different numbers of generations. Overall estimates of heritabilities were 0·15 for AFI, which agreed well with realized heritability estimates, and 0·42 for 6WW. The litter variance, expressed as a proportion of the phenotypic variance, was 0·21 for both traits, yielding intraclass correlations of full-sibs of 0·29 and 0·42, respectively. Similar results were obtained for variances of each trait using univariate and multivariate analyses. From the latter, estimates of correlations between the two traits were 0·46 for additive genetic, −0·19 for litter and 0·31 for residual effects, resulting in a phenotypic correlation of 0·23. Analyses of data from generations 2–7, 8–13 and 14–23 separately showed a marked decrease in genetic variance and heritability in later generations for both traits. Heritabilities of AFI, for instance were 0·24, 0·10 and 0·07, respectively. These changes could not be attributed to the effects of inbreeding or of selection in an infinitesimal model and suggested that some change in variance due to change in gene frequency had occurred during the course of the experiment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 71 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

Biondini, P. E., Sutherland, T. M. & Haverland, L. H. (1968). Body composition of mice selected for growth rate. Journal of Animal Science 27, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, H. T. & Pollak, E. J. (1984). Estimation of genetic trend in a selected population with and without the use of a control population. Journal of Animal Science 58, 878–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. (1980). The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Eisen, E. J. (1989). Selection experiments for body composition in mice and rats – a review. Livestock Production Science 23, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1989). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn.Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Graser, H.-U., Smith, S. P. & Tier, B. (1987). A derivative-free approach for estimating variance components in animal models by restricted Maximum Likelihood. Journal of Animal Science 64, 1362–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, I. M. & Hill, W. G. (1989). A note on the effect of different selection criteria on carcass composition in mice. Animal Production 48, 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, W. G. (1972). Estimation of realized heritabilities from selection experiments. I. Divergent selection. Biometrics 28, 747–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juga, J. & Thompson, R. (1989). Estimation of variance components selected over multiple generations. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica 39, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. (1989). Restricted Maximum Likelihood to estimate variance components for animal models with several random effects using a derivative-free algorithm. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 21, 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. (1990). Estimating variances and covariances for multivariate animal model by Restricted Maximum Likelihood. Genetics, Selection, Evolution (submitted).Google Scholar
Sharp, G. L., Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. (1984). Effects of selection on growth, body composition and food intake in mice I. Responses in selected traits. Genetical Research 43, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorensen, D. A. & Kennedy, B. W. (1984 a). Estimation of response to selection using least squares and mixed model methodology. Journal of Animal Science 58, 1097–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, D. A. & Kennedy, B. W. (1984 b). Estimation of genetic variance from selected and unselected populations. Journal of Animal Science 59, 1213–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, D. A. & Kennedy, B. W. (1986). Analysis of selection experiments using mixed model methodology. Journal of Animal Science 63, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R. (1977). The estimation of heritability with unbalanced data. II. Data available on two or more generations. Biometrics 33, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. (1986). Estimation of realized heritability in a selected population using mixed model methods. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 18, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Werf, J. H. J. & de Boer, I. J. M. (1990). Estimation of additive genetic variance when base populations are selected. Journal of Animal Science (in press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Vleck, L. D. (1985). Including records of daughters of selected bulls in estimation of sire components of variance Journal of Dairy Science 68, 2396–2402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar