Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T05:33:00.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Migration of nuclei in Coprinus lagopus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

K. M. Swiezynski  and
P. R. Day
K. M. Swiezynski
Affiliation:
John Innes Horticultural Institution, Bayfordbury, Hertford, Herts.
P. R. Day
Affiliation:
John Innes Horticultural Institution, Bayfordbury, Hertford, Herts.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Four main types of interaction between paired mycelia of Coprinus lagopus have been defined in terms of the extent of nuclear migration.

2. Nuclear migration was demonstrated in matings between monokaryotic mycelia with common A alleles. No extensive migration of nuclei was found in common B or common AB matings.

3. The speed of nuclear migration in common A matings was slower than in compatible matings. Migration occurred to approximately the same extent in both kinds of matings.

4. In heterokaryon-monokaryon matings compatible and common B heterokaryons acted only as donors. Common AB heterokaryons acted as donors and as acceptors of compatible or common A nuclei. Common A heterokaryons always acted as donors and frequently acted as acceptors of compatible or common A nuclei.

5. A simple explanation is suggested for the frequently observed fact that in an incompatible di-mon mating both nuclei of the dikaryon may migrate and eventually eliminate the nuclei of the established monokaryon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , February 1960 , pp. 129 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

References

REFERENCES

Buller, A. H. R. (1931). Researches on Fungi, 4. Longmans, Green & Co., London.Google Scholar
Crowe, L. K. (1958). (Abstract.) The exchange of genes between nuclei of a dicaryon. Proc. X Int. Congr. Genet., Montreal, 2, 61–62.Google Scholar
Day, P. R. (1959). A cytoplasmically controlled abnormality of the tetrads of Coprinus lagopus. Heredity, 13, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, H. (1936). Observations on inheritance in Coprinus macrorhizus. Ann. Bot., 50, 719–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, I. W. (1950). Unilateral nuclear migration and the interactions of haploid mycelia in the fungus Cyathus stercoreus. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 36, 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, K. (1954). Diploidisation in the Hymenomycetes. I. Preliminary experiments. Biol. J. Okayama Univ., 1, 226–233.Google Scholar
Kimura, K. (1958). Diploidisation in the Hymenomycetes. II. Nuclear behaviour in the Buller phenomenon. Biol. J. Okayama Univ., 4, 1–59.Google Scholar
Papazian, H. P. (1950). Physiology of the incompatibility factors in Schizophyllum commune. Bot. Gaz., 112, 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papazian, H. P. (1958). The genetics of basidiomycetes. Advanc. Genet., 9, 41–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintanilha, A. (1937). Contribution à l'étude génétique du phénomène de Buller. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 205, 745–747.Google Scholar
Raper, J. R. (1953). Tetrapolar sexuality. Quart. Rev. Biol., 28, 233–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raper, J. R. & San Antonio, J. P. (1954). Heterokaryotic mutagenesis in Schizophyllum commune. Amer. J. Bot., 41, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snider, P. J. & Raper, J. R. (1958). Nuclear migration in the basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune. Amer. J. Bot., 45, 538–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiezynski, K. M. & Day, P. R. (1960). Heterokaryon formation in Coprinus lagopus. Genet. Res., 1, 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar