Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:20:00.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marker-assisted estimation of quantitative genetic parameters in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2003

A. J. WILSON
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
G. McDONALD
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
H. K. MOGHADAM
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
C. M. HERBINGER
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4J1, Canada
M. M. FERGUSON
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters conventionally requires known pedigree structure. However, several methods have recently been developed to circumvent this requirement by inferring relationship structure from molecular marker data. Here, two such marker-assisted methodologies were used and compared in an aquaculture population of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Firstly a regression-based model employing estimates of pairwise relatedness was applied, and secondly a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure was employed to reconstruct full-sibships and hence an explicit pedigree. While both methods were effective in detecting significant components of genetic variance and covariance for size and spawning time traits, the regression model resulted in estimates that were quantitatively unreliable, having both significant bias and low precision. This result can be largely attributed to poor performance of the pairwise relatedness estimator. In contrast, genetic parameters estimated from the reconstructed pedigree showed close agreement with ideal values obtained from the true pedigree. Although not significantly biased, parameters based on the reconstructed pedigree were underestimated relative to ideal values. This was due to the complex structure of the true pedigree in which high numbers of half-sibling relationships resulted in inaccurate partitioning of full-sibships, and additional unrecognized relatedness between families.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press