Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:29:50.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Male mating success and fertility in Drosophila melanogaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Linda Partridge ,
Trudy F. C. Mackay  and
Susan Aitken
Linda Partridge
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Trudy F. C. Mackay
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Susan Aitken
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The male mating ability and male fertility of 40 third chromosome homozygote lines has been measured. There was significant between-line differentiation for both characters, and comparison with a heterozygous stock indicated inbreeding depression and hence dominance variation for them. The characters showed significant positive correlation both with each other and with other fitness components and total fitness, as measured by Mackay (1985). This pattern of large positive correlations between fitness components is not expected to occur in outbred populations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , December 1985 , pp. 279 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Bastock, M. (1956). A gene mutation which changes a behaviour pattern. Evolution 10, 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittnacher, J. G. (1981). Genetic variation and genetic load due to the male reproductive component of fitness in Drosophila. Genetics 97, 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundgaard, J. & Christiansen, F. B. (1972). Dynamics of polymorphisms. 1. Selection components in an experimental population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 71, 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, M. A. (1976). The genetic basis of receptivity of yellow mutant Drosophila melanogaster females. Behavior Genetics 6, 141–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewing, A. W. (1961). Body size and courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 9, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, A. W. (1964). The influence of wing area on the courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 12, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, A. W. (1978). An investigation into selective mechanisms capable of maintaining balanced polymorphisms. Ph.D. thesis. Portsmouth Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Gromko, M. H., Sheehan, K. & Richmond, R. C. (1980). Random mating in two species of Drosophila. American Naturalist 115, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisler, L. I. (1984). Inheritance of female mating propensities for yellow locus genotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 44, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, T. F. C. (1985). A quantitative genetic analysis of fitness and its components in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research, 47, in press.Google Scholar
Milkman, R. & Zietler, R. R. (1974). Concurrent multiple paternity in natural and laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 78, 1191–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, L. & Farquhar, M. (1983). Lifetime mating success of male fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster) is related to their size. Animal Behaviour 31, 871–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prout, T. (1971). The relation between fitness components and population prediction in Drosophila. 1. The estimation of fitness components. Genetics 68, 127–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, F. W. (1957). Studies in quantitative inheritance. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Genetics 55, 428–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M. R. (1984). Genetic covariation in Drosophila life history: untangling the data. American Naturalist 123, 565–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M. R. & Charlesworth, B. (1981). Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Sib analysis of adult females. Genetics 97, 173–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharp, P. M. (1982). Competitive mating in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 40, 201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, P. M. (1984). The effect of inbreeding on competitive male-mating ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106, 601–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, M. J., Preston, C. R. & Engels, W. R. (1980). Pleiotropic effects on fitness of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 94, 467–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, R. H. (1984). An investigation of male mating success in Drosophila subobscura. Collin. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Sved, J. A. (1971) An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 18, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sved, J. A. & Ayala, F. J. (1970). A population cage test for heterosis in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 66, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. (1977). Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol. 3, Experimental results and evolutionary deductions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar