Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:58:19.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leptin levels in lines of mice developed by long-term divergent selection on fat content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

LUTZ BÜNGER
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
MARGERY NICOLSON
Affiliation:
AMGEN Inc., 1 Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789, USA
WILLIAM G. HILL
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The mouse lines were developed by long-term selection for fatness, after which the fat line (F) had about a 5-fold (23% vs 4%) higher fat percentage than the lean (L) line at 14 weeks; but the lines differed little in fat-free body weight. To assess the contribution of genetic changes in leptin hormone level to the selection response, plasma leptin levels were assayed in these lines in generation 60 and in an unselected control (C) from the same base population. With access to food prior to assay, the F, C and L lines had 16·5, 0·91 and 0·26 ng/ml leptin, respectively. In fasted animals these levels were much lower: 2·98, 0·171 and 0·0087 ng/ml, respectively. Thus the leptin levels differ greatly between the lines, with the fattest mice showing the highest level: almost 20 times higher than the control and 60–300 times higher than the L line. These correlated selection effects are an order of magnitude greater than the direct selection response, and believed to be much larger than seen for any hormonal or other trait. Correlations between leptin level and fat amount were high (over 0·86) in fed or fasted animals of the F line, indicative of leptin resistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press