Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:28:15.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introgression of extranuclear genomes in finite populations: nucleo-cytoplasmic incompatibility*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Naoyuki Takahata
Naoyuki Takahata
Affiliation:
National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka-ken 411, Japan

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A ‘two locus two allele’ model is developed with special reference to the introgression of extranuclear genomes between two species of finite size. The model assumes that one locus, coded by a nuclear genome, causes the reproductive barrier while the other locus, coded by an extranuclear genome, causes nucleo-cytoplasmic incompatibility in particular genotypes. To fully study this model, simulations are conducted, and a diffusion equation is derived when introgression or extranuclear gene flow occurs in one direction. It is shown that although selection against the nuclear genome can reduce the levels of extranuclear gene flow and retard the introgression process, the dynamics are very similar to those without such selection. In contrast, the nucleo-cytoplasmic incompatibility directly affects the dynamics of introgressing extranuclear genomes: in large populations the ability of incompatibility to overcome extranuclear gene flow is conspicuous, but in small populations it is overshadowed by random sampling drift. Paternal leakage of extranuclear genomes, if present, is of evolutionary importance only when the male's migration rate is much larger than the female's. When the sizes of two populations are unequal, the introgression is most likely to occur from the larger population to the smaller one in the absence of mating preferences of backcross progeny. Recent observations on interspecific mitochondrial transfer in various species do not support the ubiquitousness of nucleo-cytoplasmic incompatibility as an efficient reproductive barrier.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 179 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Barton, N. H. (1983). Multilocus clines. Evolution 37, 454–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspari, E., Watson, G. S. & Smith, W. (1966). The influence of cytoplasmic pollen sterility on gene exchange between populations. Genetics 53, 741–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1936). Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dover, G. A. & Flavell, R. B. (ed.) (1982). Genomic Evolution. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. (1982). Promiscuous DNA-chloroplast genes inside plant mitochondria. Nature 299, 678–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewens, W. J. (1964). The pseudo-transient distribution and its use in genetics. Journal of Applied Probability 1, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewens, W. J. (1979). Mathematical Population Genetics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Farrelly, F. & Butow, R. A. (1983). Rearranged mitochondrial genes in the yeast nuclear genome. Nature 301, 296–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferris, S. D., Sage, R. D., Huang, C. M., Nielsen, J. T., Ritte, U. & Wilson, A. C. (1983). Flow of mitochondrial DNA across a species boundary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 80, 2290–2294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grun, P. & Aubertin, M. P. (1965). Evolutionary pathways of cytoplasmic male sterility in solanum. Genetics 51, 399–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, D. F. (1951). The cytoplasmic separation of species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 37, 308–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. (1980). Average time until fixation of a mutant allele in a finite population under continued mutation pressure: Studies by analytical, numerical, and pseudo-sampling methods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 77, 522–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laven, H. (1959). Speciation by cytoplasmic isolation in the Culex Pipiens-complex. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 24, 166–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. (1970). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York and London: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Li, W.-H. & Nei, M. (1977). Persistence of common alleles in two related populations or species. Genetics 86, 901–914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maruyama, T. (1977). Stochastic Problems in Population Genetics: Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol. 17. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruyama, T. & Kimura, M. (1971). Some methods for treating continuous stochastic processes in population genetics. Japanese Journal of Genetics 46, 407–410.Google Scholar
Muller, H. J. (1942). Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. In Biological Symposia, vol. 6 (ed. Dobzhansky, T.), pp. 71–125. Lancaster, Pa.: Jacques Cattell Press.Google Scholar
Murray, J. (1972). Genetic Diversity and Natural Selection. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Nagylaki, T. (1974). The moments of stochastic integrals and the distribution of sojourn times. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 71, 746–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oka, H.-I. (1978). Reproductive barriers distributed in plant species and their genetic control. In The Dynamics of Speciation in Plants and Animals (ed. Oka, H.-I. and Kitagawa, O.), pp. 56–61.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. D., Shields, D. R. & Cohen, D. B. (1983). Chloroplast DNA evolution and the origin of amphidiploid Brassica species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 65, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, J. R. (1983). Interspecific cytoplasmic gene flow in the absence of nuclear gene flow: Evidence from Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 80, 492–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prakash, S. (1972). Origin of reproductive isolation in the absence of apparent genetic differentiation in a geographic isolate of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 72, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R. K., Hunt, W. G. & Yang, S. Y. (1969). Protein polymorphism and genie heterozygosity in two European subspecies of the house mouse. Evolution 23, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. B. & Lonsdale, D. M. (1982). Mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes of maize have a 12-kilobase DNA sequence in common. Nature 299, 698–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slatkin, M. (1982). Pleiotropy and parapatric speciation. Evolution 36, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spolsky, C. & Uzzell, T. (1984). Natural interspecies transfer of mitochondrial DNA in amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 81, 5802–5805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahata, N. (1984). A model of extranuclear genomes and the substitution rate under within-generation selection. Genetical Research 44, 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahata, N. & Maruyama, T. (1981). A mathematical model of extranuclear genes and the genetic variability maintained in a finite population. Genetical Research 37, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahata, N. & Slatkin, M. (1984). Mitochondrial gene flow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 81, 1764–1767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsunewaki, K. & Kihara, H. (1962). Comparative gene analysis of common wheat and its ancestral species. I. Necrosis. Japanese Journal of Genetics 37, 474–484.Google Scholar
Weissinger, A. K., Timothy, D. H., Levings, G. S. III & Goodman, M. M. (1983). Patterns of mitochondrial DNA variation in indigenous maize races of Latin America. Genetics 104, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, M. J. D. (1978). Modes of Speciation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendalian populations. Genetics 16, 97–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1969). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 2: The Theory of Gene Frequencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yonekawa, H., Tagashira, S. & Moriwaki, K. (1983). Mitochondrial DNA and evolution of mice. Iden 37, 29–37 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Zouros, E. (1981). The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mojavensis. Genetics 97, 703–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed