Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:45:13.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of selection and recombination in the fixation of negative-epistatic genes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Yannis Michalakis  and
Montgomery Slatkin
Yannis Michalakis*
Affiliation:
Inslitut d'Ecologie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Bat. A 7ème ét. CC 237, 7 quaiSt Bernard, 75252 Paris CEDEX05, France. E-mail: [email protected]
Montgomery Slatkin
Affiliation:
Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
*
* Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigated the interaction of recombination and selection on the process of fixation of two linked loci with epistatic interactions in fitness. We consider both the probability of fixation of newly arising mutants (the static model) and the time to fixation under continued mutation (the dynamic model). Our results show that the fixation of a new advantageous combination is facilitated by higher fitness of the advantageous genotype and by weaker selection against the intermediate deleterious genotypes. Fixation occurs more rapidly when the recombination rates are small, except when selection against intermediate genotypes is weak and selection in favour of the double mutant is very strong. In these cases fixation is more rapid when the recombinant rate is large. Mutations of strong effects, deleterious when alone but beneficial when coupled, are fixed more easily than mutations of intermediate effects, at least for large recombination rates. Among the possible pathways the process of fixation might follow, independent substitutions lead to the fixation of the double mutant only when selection is weak. The relative importance of the other pathways depends on the interaction between recombination and selection. The coupled-gamete pathway (i.e. when the population waits until the double mutant appears and then drives it to fixation) is more important as selection intensity increases and the recombination rate is reduced. For all recombination rates, asymmetries in fitness of the intermediate genotypes increase the rate at which fixations occur. Finally, throughout the fixation process, the population will be monomorphic at least at one of the two loci for most of the time, which implies that there would be little opportunity to detect the presence of negative epistasis even if it were important for occasional evolutionary transitions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , June 1996 , pp. 257 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

References

Barton, N. H., (1992). On the spread of new gene combinations in the third phase of Wright's shifting-balance. Evolution 46, 551–557.Google ScholarPubMed
Barton, N. H., & Rouhani, S., (1987). The frequency of shifts between alternative equilibria. Journal of Theoretical Biology 125, 397–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, N. H., & Rouhani, S., (1993). Adaptation and the ‘shifting balance’. Genetical Research 61, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, J. F., & Kimura, M., (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Crow, J. F., Engels, W. R., & Denniston, C., (1990). Phase three of Wright's shifting-balance theory. Evolution 44, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A., (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. London: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M., (1985). The role of compensatory neutral mutations in molecular evolution. Journal of Genetics 64, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondrashov, A. S., (1992). The third phase of Wright's shifting-balance: a simple analysis of the extreme case. Evolution 46, 1972–1975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, F. B.-G., & Tonsor, S. J., (1994). A simulation of Wright's shifting-balance process: migration and the three phases. Evolution 48, 69–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Palopoli, M. F., & Wu, C.-I., (1994). Genetics of hybrid male sterility between Drosophila sibling species: a complex web of epistasis is revealed in interspecific studies. Genetics 138, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, P. C., (1993). Peak shifts and polymorphism during phase three of Wright's shifting-balance process. Evolution 47, 1733–1743.Google ScholarPubMed
Phillips, P. C., (1996). Waiting for a compensatory mutation: phase zero of the shifting-balance process. Genetical Research 67, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutledge, R. A., (1970). The survival of epistatic gene complexes in subdivided populations. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Takahata, N., (1982). Sexual recombination under the joint effects of mutation, selection and random sampling drift. Theoretical Population Biology 22, 258–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. C., (1992). Natural Selection. Domains, Levels and Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S., (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 97–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed