Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:34:04.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The interaction between effective population size and linkage intensity under artificial selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

B. D. H. Latter
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, C.S.I.R.O., Canberra, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effects of tight linkage on the total response due to pairs of identical additive loci, segregating in a population initially in linkage equilibrium, have been studied both algebraically and by means of computer simulation. Particular attention has been given to the effects of finite population size on the probabilities of (a) the elimination from the population of the gamete carrying both ‘plus’ alleles; (b) the joint preservation of the two types of repulsion gametes; (c) the recovery of the desired combination of plus alleles through crossing-over; and (d) the fixation of the gamete in the population following its recovery.

The study is restricted to situations in which linkage is known to have an appreciable effect on total selection response, i.e. to the case of genes of large effect initially at low frequency. A comparison of regimes with the same expected response under free recombination has shown the probability of (a) to be high, and the probability of (b) to be very nearly the same for all regimes tested. Provided that the recovery of the gamete carrying both plus alleles is an unlikely event at any given point in time, the probability of the fixation of the gamete, once reconstituted, is expected to be independent of population size for genes of large effect. In this context, approximate algebraic expressions have been derived for the probability of effective recovery of the required gamete, and for the mean waiting time involved.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1955). Solution of a process of random genetic drift with a continuous model. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 41, 144150.,CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. (1957). Some problems of stochastic processes in genetics. Ann. math. Statist. 28, 882901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latter, B. D. H. (1965 a). The response to artificial selection due to autosomal genes of large effect. I. Changes in gene frequency at an additive locus. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 18, 585598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latter, B. D. H. (1965 b). The response to artificial selection due to autosomal genes of large effect. II. The effects of linkage on limits to selection in finite populations. Aust. J. biol. Sci, 18, 10091023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latter, B. D. H. (1966). The response to artificial selection due to autosomal genes of large effect. III. The effects of linkage on the rate of advance and approach to fixation in finite populations. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 19, 131146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. (1960). A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. R. Soc. B, 153, 234249.Google Scholar