Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:38:41.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvement of litter size in a strain of mice at a selection limit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

D. S. Falconer
D. S. Falconer
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh, EH 9 3JN
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A strain of mice that had ceased to respond to selection for high litter size was inbred with continued selection. Depression of the mean proved the existence of residual genetic variance. Four lines survived the inbreeding, and one reached 20 generations with a mean equal to the original strain, thus disproving overdominance as a major cause of the residual variation. The four selected inbred lines were crossed and a new strain derived from the cross was maintained in parallel with the original strain. The new strain showed an improvement of 1·5 mice per litter over the original strain. Thus selection with inbreeding was able to achieve an advance beyond the limit attained by the original selection.

The hypothesis that the residual variation was due to genes with simple dominance was tested by seeing if it could account for the observations with reasonable values of the relevant parameters. The improvement made by the inbreeding and crossing required the elimination of about 30 recessive genes with effects (homozygote difference) of 0·5 phenotypic standard deviations and gene frequencies of 0·2. Consideration of the mean levels of the selected inbred lines in conjunction with the rate of depression found on inbreeding without selection showed that the selection with inbreeding had eliminated about 75% of the segregating reces-sives. The number of genes contributing to the residual variance was therefore about 40. The additive variance generated by these genes was just consistent with the estimate of zero from the realized heritability. Consideration of the original selection showed that about half the genes could have been still segregating when the response ceased. The hypothesis therefore requires the number of genes in the base population to have been about 80. The number of genes required, though large, does not seem impossible, and the hypothesis of genes with simple dominance can account for all the observations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , June 1971 , pp. 215 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

References

REFERENCES

Bowman, J. C. & Falconer, D. S. (1960). Inbreeding depression and heterosis of litter size in mice. Genetical Research 1, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960). The genetics of litter size in mice. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 56 (Suppl. 1), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1963). Qualitatively different responses to selection in opposite directions. In Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding (ed. Hanson, W. D. and Robinson, H. F.), pp. 487–490. Publ. 982, National Academy of Sciences — National Research Council, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1965). Maternal effects and selection response. Proceedings XIth International Congress of Genetics, vol. 3, pp. 763–774.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. & Roberts, R. C. (1960). Effect of inbreeding on ovulation rate and foetal mortality in mice. Genetical Research 1, 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, W. G. (1970). Theory of limits to selection with line crossing. In Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics (ed. Kojima, K.), pp. 210–245. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, W. G. (1971). Design and efficiency of selection experiments for estimating genetic parameters. Biometrics 27 (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. (1968). The effects of inbreeding at loci with heterozygote advantage. Genetics 60, 615–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R. C. (1960). The effects on litter size of crossing lines of mice inbred without selection. Genetical Research 1, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. C. (1966 a). The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. I. The limits attained in earlier experiments. Genetical Research 8, 347–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R. C. (1966 b). The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. II. The genetic nature of the limits. Genetical Research 8, 361–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R. C. (1967 a). The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. III. Selection from crosses between previously selected lines. Genetical Research 9, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. C. (1967 b). The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. IV. Sources of new genetic variance — irradiation and outcrossing. Genetical Research 9, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. (1952). The effect of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive genes. Genetics 37, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, A. (1960). A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 153, 234–249.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1967). The nature of quantitative genetic variation. In Heritage from Mendel (ed. Brink, R. A.), pp. 265–280. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Spickett, S. G. & Thoday, J. M. (1966). Regular responses to selection. 3. Interaction between located polygenes. Genetical Research 7, 96–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed