Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:43:29.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Heterosis’ in litter size of chimaeric mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Hitoshi Mikami  and
Akira Onishi
Hitoshi Mikami
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, National Institute of Animal Industry, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305, Japan
Akira Onishi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, National Institute of Animal Industry, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aggregation chimaeras were made from embryos of C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. Chimaeric and control females were mated with ICR males at 8 weeks of age and their litter sizes were evaluated over a 5-month period after the first mating. Progeny tests showed that 18 of 27 chimaeras produced oocytes of both genotypes. The mean litter sizes of C57BL/6, BALB/c and their F1 crosses (C57BL/6 × BALB/c and BALB/c × C57BL/6) were 8·14, 9·36, 13·38 and 13·40, respectively. The mean for chimaeras was 11·54 and chimaeric heterosis was evident, but it was not as much as heterosis in the F1 When the chimaeras were classified into the mixed and single-genotype progeny chimaeras, chimaeric heterosis was observed only in the mixed-progeny chimaeras. Quantitative GPI analyses in ten organs showed that the degree of chimaerism in the mixed-genotype progeny chimaeras was higher than that in most of the single-genotype progeny chimaeras and that the degree of chimaerism in the ovaries was positively correlated with litter size in the mixed-genotype progeny chimaeras. On the other hand, such correlation was not observed in the single-genotype progeny chimaeras.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 85 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Amsterdam, A., Josephs, R., Lieberman, M. E. & Linder, H. R. (1976). Organization of intramembrane particles in freeze-cleaved gap junctions of rat graafian follicles. Journal of Cell Science 21, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. & Albertini, D. E. (1976). Gap junctions between the oocyte and companion follicle cells in the mammalian ovary. Journal of Cell Biology 71, 680–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awata, T., Onishi, A. & Muramatsu, S. (1984). A simple technique for production of chimeric mouse embryos. Proceeding of the Japan Academy 60 B, 253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eicher, E. M. & Washburn, L. L. (1978). Assignment of genes to regions of mouse chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, U.S.A. 75, 946–950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, E. P., Ford, C. E. & Lyon, M. F. (1977). Direct evidence of the capacity of the XY germ cell in the mouse to become an oocyte. Nature 267, 430–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S. (1960). The genetics of litter size in mice. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 56 (1), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S., Gauld, I. K., Roberts, R. C. & Williams, D. A. (1981). The control of body size in mouse chimaeras. Genetical Research 38, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, C. E., Evans, E. P., Burtenshaw, M. D., Clegg, H. M., Tuffrey, M. & Barnes, R. D. (1975). A functional ‘sex-reversed’ oocyte in the mouse. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 190, 187–197.Google ScholarPubMed
Gearhart, J. & Oster-Granite, M. L. (1981). Reproduction in apopulation of chimeric mice: relationship of chromosomal sex to functional germ cells and proportions of chimeric components in several tissues. Biology of Reproduction 24, 713–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilula, N. B., Epstein, M. L. & Beers, W. H. (1978). Cell-to-cell communication and ovulation. A study of the cumulus-oocyte complex. Journal of Cell Biology 78, 58–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoppe, P. C. & Pitts, S. (1973). Fertilization in vitro and development of mouse ova. Biology of Reproduction 8, 420–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, J. C. (1965). The effect on litter size of crossing inbred strains of mice. Genetics 51, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, A. (1975). The independence of germ-cell genotype from somatic influence in chimaeric mice. Genetical Research 25, 215–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, A. (1978). Mammalian Chimaeras. Cambridge, London & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Milet, R. G., Mukherjee, B. B. & Written, W. K. (1972). Cellular distribution and possible mechanism of sex-differentiation in XX/XY chimeric mice. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 14, 933–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minz, B. (1962). Experimental study of the developing mammalian egg: removal of the zona pellucida. Science 138, 594–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minz, B. (1968). Hermaphroditism, sex chromosomal mosaicism and germ cell selection in allophenic mice. Journal of Animal Science 27 (1), 51–60.Google Scholar
Minz, B. (1969). Developmental mechanisms found in allophenic mice with sex chromosomal and pigmentary mosaicism. Birth defects: Original Article Series 5, 11–22. In First Conference on the Clinical Delineation of Birth Defects (ed. Bergsma, D. and McKusick, V.). New York: National Foundation.Google Scholar
Moor, R. M., Smith, M. W. & Dawson, R. M. C. (1980). Measurement of intercellular coupling between oocytes and cumulus cells using intracellular markers. Experimental Cell Research 126, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, R. J. & Whitten, W. K. (1971). Relationship of genotype and degree of chimerism in coat color to sex ratios and gametogenesis in chimeric mice. Journal of Experimental Zoology 178, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed