Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:03:01.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetics of sexual isolation in male hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Jerry A. Coyne
Jerry A. Coyne
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, 1101 E. 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sexual isolation between the sibling species D. simulans and D. mauritiana is due largely to the rejection of D. simulans males by D. mauritiana females. Genetic analysis shows that genes on the X and third chromosomes contribute to the differences between males causing sexual isolation, while the Y chromosome, second chromosome and cytoplasm have no effect. These chromosome effects differ from those observed in a previous analysis of sexual isolation in hybrid females, implying that different genes cause sexual isolation in the two sexes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , December 1996 , pp. 211 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

References

Alexander, R. D., (1962). Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution 16, 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, T. G., Harvey, P. H., & Nee, S., (1995). Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 259, 211–215.Google Scholar
Butlin, R. K., & Ritchie, M. G., (1989). Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 37, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caccone, A., Moriyama, E. N., Gleason, J. M., Nigro, L., & Powell, J. R., (1996). A molecular phylogeny for the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Journal of Molecular Evolution, in press.Google ScholarPubMed
Cariou, M. L., (1988). Biochemical phylogeny of the eight species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, including D. sechellia and D. orena. Genetical Research 50, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, B., Coyne, J. A., & Barton, N., (1987). The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. American Naturalist 130, 113–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, M., & Jallon, J. -M. (1990). Pheromones, mate recognition, and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Animal Behavior 39, 1058–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, M., Connolly, K., & Burnet, B., (1985). Courtship behavior in the melanogaster species sub-group of Drosophila. Behaviour 95, 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, M., Burnet, B., & Connolly, K., (1986). The structure of courtship in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Behaviour 97, 182–212.Google Scholar
Cobb, M., Burnet, B., & Connolly, K., (1988). Sexual isolation and courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans, D. mauritiana, and their interspecific hybrids. Behavior Genetics 18, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowling, D. F., & Burnet, B., (1981). Courtship songs and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster sub-group. Behaviour 29, 924–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. A., (1983). Genetic basis of differences in genital morphology among three sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 37, 1101–1118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A., (1984). Genetic basis of male sterility in hybrids between two closely related species of Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 51, 4444–4447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. A., (1985). Genetic studies of three sibling species of Drosophila with relationship to theories of speciation. Genetical Research 46, 169–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A., (1989). Genetics of sexual isolation between two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 86, 5464–5468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. (1992 a). Genetics and speciation. Nature 355, 511–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A. (1992 b). Genetics of sexual isolation in females of the Drosophila simulans species complex. Genetical Research 60, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A., (1993). The genetics of an isolating mechanism between two sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 47, 778–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A., (1995). Genetics of differences in pheromonal hydrocarbons between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics, in press.Google Scholar
Coyne, J. A., & Charlesworth, B., (1989). Genetic analysis of X-linked sterility in hybrids between three sibling species of Drosophila. Heredity 62, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A., & Kreitman, M., (1986). Evolutionary genetics of two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Evolution 40, 473–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A., (1989). Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43, 362–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, J., Bocquet, C, Lemeunier, F., & Tsacas, L., (1974). Hybridation d'une nouvelle espéce Drosophila mauritiana avec D. melanogaster et D. simulans. Annales Génétique 17, 235–241.Google ScholarPubMed
Davis, A. W., Noonburg, E. G. & Chung-I., Wu (1994). Evidence for complex genie interactions between conspecific chromosomes underlying hybrid female sterility in the D. simulans clade. Genetics 137, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. H., (1936). Studies in hybrid sterility. d II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudo obscura hybrids. Genetics 21, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrman, L., (1961). The genetics of sexual isolation in Drosophila paulistorum. Genetics 46, 1025–1038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grula, J. W., & Taylor, O. R., (1979). The inheritance of pheromone production in the sulphur butterflies Colias eurytheme and C. philodice. Heredity 42, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grula, J. W., & Taylor, R., (1980). The effect of X chromosome inheritance on mate-selection behavior in the sulfur butterflies Colias eurytheme and C. philodice. Evolution 34, 688–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwasa, Y., & Pomiankowski, A., (1995). Continual change in mate preferences. Nature 377, 420–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jallon, J. -M. & David, J. R., (1987). Variations in cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Evolution 41, 294–302.Google ScholarPubMed
Kawanishi, M., & Watanabe, T. K., (1981). Genes affecting courtship song and mating preference in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and their hybrids. Evolution 35, 1128–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J., & Noor, M., (1996). Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliman, R. M., & Hey, J., (1993). DNA sequence variation at the period locus within and among species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex. Genetics 133, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krebs, R. A., (1990). Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation in Drosophila mojavensis: genetic analysis of population hybrids. Behavior Genetics 20, 535–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R., (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 78, 3721–3725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemeunier, F., & Ashburner, M., (1976). Relationship within the melanogaster subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophord). II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 193, 275–294.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindsley, D. L., & Zimm, G. G., (1992). The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liou, L. W., & Price, T. D., (1994). Speciation by reinforcement of prezygotic isolation. Evolution 48, 1451–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löfstedt, C., (1993). Moth pheromone genetics and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 340, 167–177.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, C., Hansson, B. S., Roelofs, W., & Bengtsson, B. O., (1989). No linkage between genes controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner (Lepidoptera; Pyralideae). Genetics 123, 553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveira, H., & Barbadilla, A., (1992). The theoretical distribution of lengths of intact chromosome segments around a locus held heterozygous with backcrossing in a diploid species. Genetics 130, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, W., (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, H. M., (1983). Mating behavior and the evolution of Drosophila mauritiana. Evolution 37, 1283–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelofs, W., Glover, T., Tang, X.-H., Sreng, I., Robbins, P., Eckenrode, C., Löfstedt, C., Hansson, B. S., & Bengtson, B., (1987). Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 84, 7585–7589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silberglied, R. E., & Taylor, O. R., (1973). Ultraviolet differences between the sulfur butterflies, Colias eury theme and C. philodice, and a possible isolating mechanism. Nature 241, 406–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G., (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th edn.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, A. H., (1929). The genetics of Drosophila simulans. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publications 399, 1–62.Google Scholar
Tan, C. C., (1946). Genetics of sexual isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Genetics 31, 558–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
True, J. R., Mercer, J. M., & Laurie, C. C. (1996 a). Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics 142, 507–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
True, J. R., Weir, B. S., & Laurie, C. C. (1996 b). A genomewide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics 142, 819–837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsacas, K., & David, J., (1974). Drosophila mauritiana n. sp. du groupe mélanogaster de l'Île Maurice. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 79, 42–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, T. K., & Kawanishi, ,. (1979). Mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila. Science 205, 906–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, J. H., (1976). The genetics of the Y chromosome. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, vol. 1b (ed Ashburner, M.Novitski, E.), pp. 667–699. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wu, C.-I. & Palopali, M., (1994). Genetics of postmating reproductive isolation in animals. Annual Review of Genetics 27, 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, M.-T. (1992). Inviability of hybrids between D. melanogaster and D. simulans results from the absence of simulans X not the presence of simulans Y chromosome. Genetica 87, 151–158.Google Scholar
Zouros, E., (1981). The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mohavensis. Genetics 97, 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar