Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:14:03.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetics of sexual isolation in females of the Drosophila simulans species complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Jerry A. Coyne
Jerry A. Coyne
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, 1101 E. 57th St, Chicago, IL 60637USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Genetic analysis of hybrids between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia shows that sexual isolation in females is caused by at least two genes, one on each major autosome, while the X chromosome has no effect. These results are similar to those of a previous study of hybrids between D. simulans and another sibling species, D. mauritiana. In this latter hybridization, each arm of the second chromosome carries genes causing sexual isolation in females, implying a total divergence of at least three loci. The genetic similarity between the D. simulans/D. mauritiana and D. simulans/D. sechellia hybridizations probably results from independent evolution and not phylogenetic artifacts, because the dominance relationships and behavioural interactions differ between the two hybridizations. The lack of an X-chromosome effect on sexual isolation contrasts with genetic studies of post-zygotic reproductive isolation, which invariably show strong effects of this chromosome.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , August 1992 , pp. 25 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

Cariou, M. L. (1987). Biochemical phylogeny of the eight species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, including D. sechellia and D. orena. Genetical Research 50, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B.Coyne, J. A. & Barton, N. (1987). The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. American Naturalist 130, 113–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, M.Burnet, B.Blizard, R. & Jallon, J.-M. (1989). Courtship in Drosophila sechellia: Its structure, functional aspects, and relationship to those of other members of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Journal of Insect Behavior 2, 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, M.Burnet, B. & Connolly, K. (1988). Sexual isolation and courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans, D. mauritiana, and their interspecific hybrids. Behavior Genetics 18,211–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobb, M.Connolly, K. & Burnet, B. (1985). Courtship behaviour in the melanogaster species sub-group of Drosophila. Behaviour 95, 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, M. & Jallon, J.-M. (1990). Pheromones, mate recognition, and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila melanogaster species sub-group. Animal Behavior 39, 1058–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. A. (1989). Genetics of sexual isolation between two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 86, 5464–5468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A. (1991). Genetics and speciation. Nature 355, 511–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. A. & Kreitman, M. (1986). The evolutionary genetics of two sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 40, 673–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. (1989). Two rules of speciation. In: Speciation and its Consequences D. (ed. Otte, D. and Endler, J.), pp. 180–207. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Ehrman, L. (1961). The genetics of sexual isolation in Drosophila paulistorum. Genetics 46, 1025–1038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferveur, J.-F. (1991). Genetic control of phermones in Drosophila simulans. I. Ngbo, a locus on the second chromosome. Genetics 128, 293–301.Google Scholar
Giddings, L. V. & Templeton, A. R. (1983). Behavioural phylogenies and the direction of evolution. Science 220, 372–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jallon, J.-M. (1984). A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship. Behaviour Genetics 14, 441–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachaise, D.David, J. R.Lemeunier, F.Tsacas, L. & Ashburner, M. (1986). The reproductive relationships of Drosophila sechellia with D. mauritiana, D. simulans and D. melanogaster from the Afrotropical region. Evolution 40, 262–271.Google Scholar
Lemeunier, F.David, J. R.Tsacas, L. & Ashburner, M. (1986). The melanogaster species group. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, (ed. Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L. and Thompson, J.R. Jr) Vol. 3e pp. 147–256. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Orr, H. A. & Coyne, J. A. (1991). The genetics of adaptation revisited. American Naturalist (in the press).Google Scholar
Robertson, H. M. (1983). Mating behavior and the evolution of Drosophila mauritiana. Evolution 37, 1283–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelofs, W.Glover, T.Tang, X.-H.Sreng, I.Robbins, P.Eckenrode, C.Lofstedt, C.Hansson, B. S. & Bengtsson, B. O. (1987). Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 84, 7585–7589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturtevant, A. H. (1929). The genetics of Drosophila simulans. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 399, pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
Tan, C. C. (1946). Genetics of sexual isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Genetics 31, 558–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsacas, L. & Bachli, B. (1981). Drosophila sechellia n., sp., huitieme espece du sous-groupe melanogaster des iles Sechelles (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Revue franfais d'entomologie 3, 146–150.Google Scholar
Zouros, E. (1981). The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mohavensis. Genetics 97, 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar