Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:55:01.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetics of resistance to Amphorophora rubi (Kalt.) in the raspberry II. The genes A2–A7 from the American variety, Chief

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

R. L. Knight ,
J. B. Briggs  and
Elizabeth Keep
R. L. Knight
Affiliation:
East Mailing Research Station, Maidstone, Kent
J. B. Briggs
Affiliation:
East Mailing Research Station, Maidstone, Kent
Elizabeth Keep
Affiliation:
East Mailing Research Station, Maidstone, Kent
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The American raspberry variety Chief is shown to carry three dominant genes, A5, A6 and A7, each capable of conferring strong resistance to Amphorophora rubi strain 1.

Chief also carries three genes, A2, A3 and A4, for resistance to A. rubi strain 2. A2 is a dominant gene conferring full resistance by itself; A3 and A4 are dominant complementaries, neither gene by itself having any effect on resistance. A5 is linked with either A3 or A4 with a crossover value of 10%.

The gene A1 from Baumforth A, which confers resistance to strains 1 and 3, when combined with A3 gives resistance to strain 2 also. Thus the three strains of A. rubi at present recognized on raspberries in Britain can be controlled by using either the combination A1A2 or A1A3.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , July 1960 , pp. 319 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

References

REFERENCES

Briggs, J. B. (1959). Three new strains of Amphorophora rubi (Kalt.) on cultivated raspberries in England. Bull. ent. Res. 50, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R. M. and Olmo, H. P. (1949). Register of new fruit and nut varieties. Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 53, 573–588.Google Scholar
Cadman, C. H. (1951). Studies in Rubus virus diseases. I. Ann. appl. Biol. 38, 801–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadman, C. H. (1952 a). Studies in Rubus virus diseases. III. Ann. appl. Biol. 39, 69–77.Google Scholar
Cadman, C. H. (1952 b). Studies in Rubus virus diseases. V. Ann. appl. Biol. 39, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadman, C. H. (1954). Studies in Rubus virus diseases. VI. Ann. appl. Biol. 41, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadman, C. H. & Harris, R. V. (1952). A lethal virus disease of Lloyd George raspberry in Scotland. J. hort. Sci. 27, 212–214.Google Scholar
Grubb, N. H. & Wood, C. A. (1954). Recent progress in raspberry breeding. Rep. E. Mailing Res. Sta. for 1953, 95–104.Google Scholar
Hedrick, U. P. (1925). The small fruits of New York. Rep. N.Y. St. agric. Exp. Sta. 33, II, 614 pp.Google Scholar
Knight, R. L., Keep, Elizabeth & Briggs, J. B. (1959). Genetics of resistance to Amphorophora rubi (Kalt.) in the raspberry. I. J. Genet. 56, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartze, C. D. & Huber, G. A. (1937). Aphis resistance in breeding mosaic-escaping red raspberries. Science, 86, 158–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartze, C. D. & Huber, G. A. (1939). Further data on breeding mosaic-escaping raspberries. Phytopathology, 29, 647–648.Google Scholar
Slate, G. L. (1935). The best parents in raspberry breeding. Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 32, 407–410.Google Scholar
Stace-Smith, R. (1954). Chlorotic spotting of black raspberry induced by the feeding of Amphorophora rubitoxica Knowlton. Canad. Ent. 86, 232–235.Google Scholar
Stace-Smith, R. (1955 a). Studies on Rubus virus diseases in British Columbia. I. Canad. J. Bot. 33, 269–274.Google Scholar
Stace-Smith, R. (1955 b). Studies on Rubus virus diseases in British Columbia. II. Canad. J. Bot. 33, 314–322.Google Scholar