Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:51:35.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A genetic study of cold resistance in wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

C. N. Law  and
G. Jenkins
C. N. Law
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, England
G. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The variety Chinese Spring of Triticum aestivum is susceptible to cold treatment applied at the juvenile plant stage, while the variety Cappelle-Desprez shows resistance to such treatment. By cytological and backcross procedures single homologous pairs of chromosomes from Cappelle-Desprez were substituted for their homologues in Chinese Spring. Assay experiments carried out on each of the 21 possible substitution lines indicated that three chromosomes, 4D, 5D and 7A of Cappelle-Desprez were involved in the determination of cold resistance. The resistance expressed by the three substitution lines carrying these chromosomes was less than the reaction of Cappelle-Desprez to cold treatment. Also the magnitude of this resistance supported a hypothesis that the action of the three chromosomes was additive on the scale of measurement used. The possible relationships of the genes for cold resistance to the established genes controlling other developmental characters, also carried by these three chromosomes, are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 1970 , pp. 197 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

References

REFERENCES

Goujon, C., Maia, N. & Doussinault, G. (1968). Résistance au froid chez le blé. II. Réactions au stade coléoptile étudiées en conditions artificielles. Ann. Amélior. Plantes 18, 49–57.Google Scholar
Halloran, G. M. (1967). Gene dosage and vernalisation response in homoeologous group 5 of Triticum aestivum. Genetics 57, 401–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halloran, G. M. & Boydell, C. W. (1967). Wheat chromosomes with genes for vernalisation response. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 9, 632–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretschmer, G. (1960). Die Torsomethode, ein direktes Schnellverfahren für Frost resistenzprüfungen mit Getreide. Züchter. 30, 251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuspira, J. & Unrau, J. (1957). Genetic analysis of certain characters in common wheat using whole chromosome substitution lines. Can. J. Plant Sci. 37, 300–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, C. N. (1966 a). The location of genetic factors affecting a quantitative character in wheat. Genetics 53, 487–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, C. N. (1966 b). Biometrical analysis using chromosome substitutions within a species. In Chromosome manipulations and plant genetics (Ed. Riley, R. and Lewis, K. R.), pp. 59–85. London: Oliver and Boyd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, C. N. (1967). The location of genetic factors controlling a number of quantitative characters in wheat. Genetics 56, 445–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, C. N. (1968 a). Genetic analysis using inter-varietal chromosome substitutions. Proc. 3rd Int. Wheat Genet. Symp., Canberra, 1968, pp. 331–342.Google Scholar
Law, C. N. (1968 b). Rep. Pl. Breed. Inst. 1966–1967, pp. 107–108.Google Scholar
Law, C. N. (1968 c). EWAC Newsletter No. 1 (Ed. Law, C. N.), Pl. Breed. Inst., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Levitt, J. (1956). The hardiness of plants. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, H. G. (1965). A technique of freezing plant crowns to determine the cold resistance of winter oats. Crop. Sci. 5, 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R., Schmidt, J. W., Mattern, P. J. & Johnson, V. A. (1966). Chromosomal location of genes for flour quality in the wheat variety Cheyenne using substitution lines. Crop. Sci. 6, 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. W. (1960). The monosomic analysis of growth habit in winter wheat. Z. Verb. 91, 141–151.Google Scholar
Sears, E. R. (1953). Nullisomic analysis in common wheat. Am. Nat. 87, 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, E. R. (1954). The aneuploids of common wheat. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 572.Google Scholar
Sears, E. R. (1958). The aneuploids of common wheat. Proc. 1st Int. Wheat Genet. Symp. Winnipeg, 221–228.Google Scholar
Tsunewaki, K. (1966). Comparative gene analysis of common wheat and its ancestral species. II. Waxiness, growth habit and awnedness. Jap. J. Bot. 19, 175–229.Google Scholar
Tsunewaki, K. (1968). Origin and phylogenetic differentiation of common wheat revealed by comparative gene analysis. Proc. 3rd Int. Wheat Genet. Symp., Canberra, 1968, pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
Unrau, J. (1950). The use of monosomics and nullisomics in cytogenetical studies of common wheat. Sci. Agric. 30, 66–89.Google Scholar