Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:26:06.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic stability of the Cornell randombred control population of White Leghorns†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Steven C. King ,
L. Dale Van Vleck  and
Donald P. Doolittle
Steven C. King
Affiliation:
Cornell University and United States Department of Agriculture
L. Dale Van Vleck
Affiliation:
Cornell University and United States Department of Agriculture
Donald P. Doolittle
Affiliation:
Cornell University and United States Department of Agriculture
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Six years of data collected from two shifts of Cornell random bred control matings each year are analysed. Approximately 900 progeny were tested per year from 50 sires mated to 250 dams.

Means for the important economic traits are presented by years and regressions for nine such traits, together with their standard deviations, are shown. The only significant regressions are those for both egg production and specific gravity score in shift II. An abnormally low egg production the first year for this shift is considered responsible for this result and the reality of the regression is discounted.

Genetic variances are presented by trait and year. Year to year variability is evident, but no trends are indicated.

Estimates of heritability and genetic correlations between traits are presented. These estimates are considered to be quite reliable and will be useful as estimates of genetic parameters when this population is used in selection experiments. Estimates of heritability from the sire components of variance were as follows: 8-week body-weight, 0·29; 32-week body-weight, 0·48; 55-week body-weight, 0·44; age at maturity, 0·09; egg production to 500 days, 0·07; 32-week egg-weight, 0·51; 55-week egg-weight, 0·53; USDA albumen score, 0·29; blood spot score, 0·13; and specific gravity score, 0·34.

Important maternal effects were found for 8, 32 and 55-week body-weight, sexual maturity and egg production. Selection programmes should take into consideration the fact that maternal effects accounted for 13% of the total variation in egg production. Genetic correlations utilizing combined sire and dam components revealed no serious antagonisms between egg production and other economic traits. However, this conclusion must be considered in the light of what influence maternal effects may have, since correlations computed from sire and dam components separately may have opposite signs and be important.

The many negative estimates of interaction components (SH, genetic by environment) and (I, sire by dam) indicate that these elements of the model contributed little to the variation of the traits studied.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , July 1963 , pp. 290 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

REFERENCES

Bray, D. F., Bell, A. E. & King, S. C. (1962). The importance of genotype by environment interaction with reference to control populations. Genet. Res. 3, 282–302.Google Scholar
Eisenhart, C. (1947). The assumptions underlying the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 3, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, K., Dickerson, G. E. & Lamoreux, W. F. (1955). A technique for measuring genetic progress in poultry breeding experiments. Poult. Sci. 34, 1197.Google Scholar
Gowe, R. S. & Johnson, A. S. (1956). The performance of a control strain of S.C. White Leghorn stock over four generations on test at several locations. Poult. Sci. 35, 1146.Google Scholar
Gowe, R. S., Johnson, A. S., Downs, J. H., Gibson, R., Mountain, W. F., Strain, J. H. & Tinney, B. F. (1959). Environment and poultry breeding problems. 4. The value of a random-bred control strain in a selection study. Poult. Sci. 38, 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowe, R. S., Robertson, A. & Latter, B. D. H. (1959). Environment and poultry breeding problems. 5. Design of poultry control strains. Poul. Sci. 38, 462–471.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. R. (1953). Estimation of variance and covariance components. Biometrics, 9, 226–252.Google Scholar
King, S. C. (1961). Inheritance of economic traits in the Regional Cornell Control popualtion. Poult. Sci. 40, 975–986.Google Scholar
King, S. C., Carson, J. R. & Doolittle, D. P. (1959). The Connecticut and Cornell random-bred populations of chickens. World's Poult. Sci. J. 15, 139–159.Google Scholar
Skaller, F. (1956). The Hagedoorn ‘nucleus-system’ of breeding—a critical evaluation based on an experiment with poultry. Proc. Australian Soc. Animal Prod. 1, 165–176.Google Scholar
Weinland, B. T., Carson, J. R. & King, S. C. (1963). Stability of gene frequencies in a randombred control population of chickens. Poult. Sci. 42 (submitted).Google Scholar