Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:37:05.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster: II. Growth relations and competition between selected lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Barrie Burnet ,
David Sewell  and
Marten Bos
Barrie Burnet
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Sheffield, England
David Sewell
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Sheffield, England
Marten Bos
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Sheffield, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Growth relations of lines selected for fast or slow larval feeding rate have been compared with those in the genetically heterogeneous control base population from which they were derived. Larvae of the slow strain have reduced growth rate and reach their critical weight for pupation later than unselected larvae. Larvae of the fast strain attain their critical weight at the same time as the unselected control larvae, suggesting that growth rate in the precritical period of development is already maximized in the base population and cannot be improved by increasing food intake. This constraint does not apply to the fixed period of post-critical growth however, since fast feeding larvae give rise to larger adult flies than the controls.

Larval feeding rate is affected by genes located on all three major chromosomes. The small fourth chromosome has negligible effect. Selection for slow feeding rate has led to an increase in the frequency of recessive genes affecting the character. High scores of larvae selected for fast feeding rate depend upon interactions between non-homologous selected chromosomes which individually have little effect. Larval feeding rate in the control unselected population appears to be buffered, firstly by epistatic interactions against the effects of chromosomes tending to promote ‘supra-optimal’ feeding rate and, secondly, by dominance against chromosomes promoting a lowering of feeding rate.

Under conditions of scramble type competition between the selected lines for limited resources, fast feeding larvae have a higher survival rate, and complete their period of larval development earlier to give larger adult flies than their slow feeding competitors. The contribution of larval feeding rate to competitive ability at different levels is discussed, and it is suggested that the effects of change in this behavioural character may be far reaching.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , October 1977 , pp. 149 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

References

REFERENCES

Bakker, K. (1961). An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Archives Neerlandaiaes de Zoologie 14, 200–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, K. (1969). Selection for rate of growth and its influence on competitive ability of larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 19, 541–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, L. C. (1957). The meaning of competition. American Naturalist 91, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, R. B. & Robertson, F. W. (1966). Biochemical analysis of genetic differences in the growth of Drosophila. Genetical Research 7, 383–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, J. M., Maynard Smith, J. & Sondhi, K. C. (1961). Asymetrical response to selection for rate of development in Drosophila subobscura. Genetical Research 2, 70–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, A. W. (1961). Body size and courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 9, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1962). Probit Analysis, 2nd edn.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kearsey, M. J. (1965). The interaction of competition and food supply in two lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 20, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearsey, M. J. & Kojima, K. (1967). The genetic architecture of body weight and egg hatchability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 56, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, A. J. (1955). An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Australian Journal of Zoology 2, 9–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1954). Studies in quantitative inheritance. V. Chromosome analyses of crosses between selected and unselected lines of different body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Genetics 52, 494–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1957). Studies in quantitative inheritance. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Genetics 55, 428–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1963). The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila melanogaster. 6. The genetic correlation between the duration of the larval period and body size in relation to larval diet. Genetical Research 4, 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, J. H. & Clayton, F. A. (1957). Selection for larval development time in Drosophila. Journal of Heredity 48, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, D., Burnet, B. & Connolly, K. (1975). Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 24, 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, D. F., Hunt, D. M. & Burnet, B. (1975). Biogenic amines in Drosophila melanogaster selected for differences in larval feeding behaviour. Behavioral Biology 15, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar