Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:22:35.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frequency of the transposable element Uq in Iowa stiff stalk synthetic maize populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Kendall R. Lamkey ,
Peter A. Petérson  and
Arnel R. Hallauer
Kendall R. Lamkey*
Affiliation:
Cereal and Soybean Improvement Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, 1A 50011, USA
Peter A. Petérson
Affiliation:
Cereal and Soybean Improvement Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, 1A 50011, USA
Arnel R. Hallauer
Affiliation:
Cereal and Soybean Improvement Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, 1A 50011, USA
*
† Corresponding author
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Uq transposable element is one of two transposable elements consistently found in maize (Zea mays L.) populations. Populations developed from two independent recurrent selection programs initiated in the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) maize population were tested for the frequency of Uq transposable elements to determine how Uq frequency has changed with cycles of recurrent selection. In the first programme, 13 cycles of half-sib and S2 progeny recurrent selection [BSSS(S)C13] have been completed and 10 of the 13 cycles were assayed for active Uq elements. In the second programme, 11 cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection [BSSS(R)C11] have been completed and five of the 11 cycles were assayed for active Uq elements. The frequency of Uq was different for the two recurrent-selection programmes. The percentage of plants containing active Uq elements increased from 19% (BSSS) to 91% [BSSS(S)C13] at a linear rate after 13 cycles of half-sib and S2 progeny recurrent selection, whereas the percentage of plants containing active Uq elements decreased from 19% (BSSS) to 0% [BSSS(R)C11] after 11 cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection, with extinction of the Uq element occurring between the fifth and sixth cycles of selection. Our data suggest that the increase in frequency of Uq with half-sib and S2 progeny recurrent selection was predominantly due to random genetic drift coupled with a selective advantage possibly associated with a region of the genome linked to Uq. Neither replicative transposition or chromosome assortment and segregation can be invoked to explain the change in frequency of Uq in these populations. The extinction of Uq after reciprocal recurrent selection was best explained by random genetic drift.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

Charlesworth, B. (1988). The maintenance of transposable elements in natural populations. In Plant Transposable Elements (ed. Nelson, O.), pp. 189–212. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, J. B., Cox, D. F. & Peterson, P. A. (1988). Presence of the transposable element Uq in maize breeding material. Crop Science 28, 941–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhart, S. A., Debela, S. & Hallauer, A. R. (1973). Reciprocal recurrent selection in the BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations and half-sib selection in BSSS. Crop Science 13, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedemann, P. & Peterson, P. A. (1982). The Uq controlling element system in maize. Molecular and General Genetics 187, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, A. G. & Hickey, D. A. (1987). Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: the elimination of P elements through repeated backcrossing to an M-type strain. Genome 29, 195–200.Google Scholar
Good, A. G., Meister, G. A., Brock, H. W., Grigliatti, T. A. & Hickey, D. A. (1989). Rapid spread of transposable P elements in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 122, 387–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallauer, A. R. (1985). Compendium of recurrent selection methods and their application. Critical Reviews in Plant Science 3, 1–34. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hallauer, A. R., Russell, W. A. & Smith, O. S. (1983). Quantitative analysis of Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic. In Stadler Genetics Symposia, (ed. Gustofson, J. P.), Vol. 15, pp. 83–104. University of Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, Columbia.Google Scholar
Lee, E. A. (1989). Molecular marker analysis of Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic maize population. M.S. Thesis. Iowa State University, Ames.Google Scholar
Mackay, T. F. C. (1984). Jumping genes meet abdominal bristles: hybrid dysgenesis-induced quantitative variation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 44, 231–237.Google Scholar
Mackay, T. F. C. (1985). Transposable element-induced response to artificial selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 111, 351–374.Google Scholar
Pan, Y.-B. & Peterson, P. A. (1989). Tagging of a maize gene involved in kernel development by an activated Uq transposable element. Molecular and General Genetics 219, 324–327.Google Scholar
Penny, L. H. & Eberhart, S. A. (1971). Twenty years of reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Science 11, 900–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, P. A. (1986). Mobile elements in maize: a force in evolutionary and plant breeding processes. In Genetics, Development, and Evolution (ed. Gustafson, J. P., Stebbins, G. L. and Ayala, F. J.), pp. 47–78. New York: Plenum Publishing Corp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, P. A. (1987). Mobile elements in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Science 6, 105–208. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, P. A. (1988). Transposons in maize and their role in corn breeding progress. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference. Chicago, 9–11 December, 1988, (ed. Loden, H. D. and Wilkinson, D.), pp. 51–71. Washington, DC: American Seed Trade Association.Google Scholar
Peterson, P. A. & Friedemann, P. D. (1983). The Ubiquitous controlling-element system and its distribution in assorted maize testers. Maydica 28, 213–249.Google Scholar
Peterson, P. A. & Salamini, F. (1985). A search for active mobile elements in the Iowa stiff-stalk synthetic maize population and some derivatives. Maydica 31, 163–172.Google Scholar
Rawlings, J. O. & Thompson, D. L. (1962). Performance level as criterion for the choice of maize testers. Crop Science 2, 217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, M. M., Peacock, W. J., Dennis, E. S. & Gerlach, W. L. (1983). Maize Ac/Ds controlling elements: a molecular viewpoint. Maydica 28, 289–302.Google Scholar
Saedler, H. & Nevers, P. (1985). Transposition in plants: a molecular model. EMBO Journal 4, 585–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffer, H. E., Yardley, D. & Anderson, W. W. (1977). Drift or selection: a statistical test of gene frequency variation over generations. Genetics 87, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz-Sommer, Zs., Gierl, A., Cuypers, H., Peterson, P. A. & Saedler, H. (1985). Plant transposable elements generate the DNA sequence diversity needed in evolution. EMBO Journal 4, 591–597.Google Scholar
Schwarz-Sommer, Zs., Shepherd, N., Tacke, E., Gierl, A., Rohde, W., Leclercq, L., Mattes, M., Berndtgen, R., Peterson, P. A. & Saedler, H. (1987). Influence of transposable elements on the structure and function of the A1 gene of Zea mays L. EMBO Journal 6, 287–294.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. A. (1979). Molecular model for the transposition and replication of bacteriophage Mu and other transposable elements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 76, 1933–1937.Google Scholar
Sprague, G. F. (1946). Early testing of inbred lines of corn. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 38, 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torkamanzehi, A., Moran, C. & Nicholas, F. W. (1988). P-element-induced mutation and quantitative variation in Drosophila melanogaster: lack of enhanced response to selection in lines derived from dysgenic crosses. Genetical Research 51, 231–238.Google Scholar
Vencovsky, R. (1978). Effective size of monoecious populations submitted to artificial selection. Brazilian Journal of Genetics 3, 181–191.Google Scholar
Wessler, S. R., Baran, G., Varagona, M. & Dellaporta, S. L. (1986). Excision of Ds produces waxy proteins with a range of enzymatic activities. EMBO Journal 5, 2427–2432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, S. R. (1980). Analyzing gene-frequency data when the effective population size is finite. Genetics 95, 489–502.Google Scholar
Zuber, M. S. & Darrah, L. L. (1980). 1979 U.S. corn germplasm base. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference. Chicago, 9–11 December, 1980, (ed. Loden, H. D. and Wilkinson, D.), pp. 234–249. Washington, DC: American Seed Trade Association.Google Scholar