Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:21:22.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fitness of allozyme variants in Drosophila pseudoobscura: II. Selection at the Est-5, Odh and Mdh-2 loci*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Dragoslav Marinković  and
Francisco J. Ayala
Dragoslav Marinković
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616
Francisco J. Ayala
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have studied the effects on fitness of allelic variation at three gene loci (Est-5, Odh, and Mdh-2)coding for enzymes in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genotype has a significant effect on fitness for all six parameters measured (female fecundity, male mating capacity, egg-to-adult survival under near-optimal and under competitive conditions, and rate of development under near-optimal and under competitive conditions). No single genotype is best for all six fitness parameters; rather, genotypes with superior performance during a certain stage of the life-cycle may have low fitness at some other stage, or in different environmental conditions. Heterozygotes are sometimes best when all fitness parameters are considered. There are significant interactions between loci. The various forms of balancing selection uncovered in our experiments may account for the polymorphisms occurring in natural populations of D. pseudoobscura at the three loci studied.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 137 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Allard, R. W., Babel, G. B., Clegg, M. T. & Kahler, A. L. (1972). Evidence for co-adaptation in Avena barbata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 69, 3043–3048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, F. J. (1972). Darwinian versus non-Darwinian evolution in natural populations of Drosophila. Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability V, 211–236.Google Scholar
Ayala, F. J. & Campbell, C. (1974). Frequency dependent selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, F. J., Tracey, M. L., Barr, L. G., Mcdonald, J. F. & Pérez-Salas, S. (1974). Genetic variation in natural populations of five Drosophila species and the hypothesis of the selective neutrality of protein polymorphisms. Genetics 77, 343–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobzhansky, Th. (1951). Genetics and the Origin of Species (3rd ed.). New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. (1970). Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. & Ayala, F. J. (1973). Temporal frequency changes of enzyme and chromosomal polymorphisms in natural populations of Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 70, 680–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, E. B. (1971). Ecological Genetics (3rd ed.). London: Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Duarte, R., Gonzalez Izquiero, M. C. & Prevosti, A. (1973). Polymorphism for esterases and alcohol dehydrogenases in natural populations of Drosophila subobscura. International Meeting on Quantitative Inheritance, Polymorphism, Selection and Environment. Atti della Accademia delle Scienze dell'Istituto di Bologna, 261, serie in, no. 1, 65–70.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1968). Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature, Lond. 217, 624–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. & Ohta, T. (1971). Protein polymorphism as a phase of molecular evolution. Nature, Lond. 229, 467–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, J. L. & Jukes, T. H. (1969). Non-Darwinian evolution. Science 164, 788–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinković, D. & Ayala, F. J. (1975). Fitness of allozyme variants in Drosophila pseudo-obscura. I. Selection at the Pgm-1 and Me-2 loci. Genetics, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1970). Populations, Species and Evolution. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Prakash, S. & Lewontin, R. C. (1968). A molecular approach to the study of genie heterozy-gosity in natural populations. III. Direct evidence of coadaptation in gene arrangements of Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 59, 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, S. & Lewontin, R. C. (1971). A molecular approach to the study of genie heterozy-gosity in natural populations. V. Further direct evidence of coadaptation in inversions of Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 69, 405–408.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. M. & Baker, W. K. (1973). Frequency distribution and linkage disequilibrium of active and null esterase isozymes in natural populations of Drosophila montana. The American Naturalist 107, 709–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, B. (1968). Topics in Population Genetics. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Webster, T. P. (1973). Adaptive linkage disequilibrium between two esterase loci of a salamander. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 70, 1156–1160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zouros, E. & Krimbas, C. B. (1973). Evidence for linkage disequilibrium maintained by selection in two natural populations of Drosophila subobscura. Genetics 73, 659–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed