Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:23:13.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A factor on a wild third chromosome (IIIRa) that modifies the Segregation Distortion phenomenon in Drosophila melanogaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

G. Trippa
Affiliation:
Istituto di Genetica, Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
A. Loverre
Affiliation:
Istituto di Genetica, Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

IIIRa is a genetic modifier of Segregation Distortion (SD) in Drosophila melanogaster, which was discovered in the same natural population from Ranna (Sicily) that carried SDRa. It is located at 49·7 ± 0·8 on chromosome III. IIIRa was found to have a dominant effect on segregation distortion which varied with the origin of the SD chromosome tested. Thus it enhanced the level of distortion caused by 14 SD chromosomes from seven natural populations in Southern Italy and Sicily, but decreased the level of distortion caused by SDR−1, a chromosome from a natural population near Rome. Moreover, IIIRa determined or enhanced the distorting effect of SDRa in males heterozygous for SDRa and various SD+ wild chromosomes differently sensitive to SDRa. The frequency of chromosomes having an effect like IIIRa chromosome was very high (around 70%) in samples from two natural populations of Southern Italy tested-those of Ranna and Corato. No effects of IIIRa other than its ability to modify SD have been detected.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Greenberg, R. (1962). Two new cases of SD found in nature. Drosophila Information Service 36, 70.Google Scholar
Hartl, D. L. (1970). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IX. Suppressors of Segregation Distorter in wild populations. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 12, 594600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartl, D. L., Hiraizumi, Y. & Crow, J. F. (1967). Evidence for sperm dysfunction as the mechanism of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 58, 22402245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hihara, Y. K. (1971). Genetic analysis of modifying system of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Nippon Idengaku Zasshi 46, 7582.Google Scholar
Hiraizumi, Y. & Kataoka, Y. (1965). Suppressing system of SD in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster in Japan. Annual Report, National Institute of Genetics, Japan, no. 16, p. 26.Google Scholar
Hiraizumi, Y. & Nakazima, K. (1965). SD in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster in Japan. Drosophila Information Service 40, 72.Google Scholar
Hiraizumi, Y. & Nakazima, K. (1967). Deviant sex-ratio associated with segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 55, 681697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiraizumi, Y. & Watanabe, S. S. (1969). Ageing effect on the phenomenon of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 63, 121131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiraizumi, Y., Sandler, L. & Crow, J. F. (1960). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Populational implications of the Segregation-Distorter locus. Evolution 14, 433434.Google Scholar
Kataoka, Y. (1967). A genetic system modifying Segregation Distortion in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster in Japan. Japanese Journal of Genetics 42, 327337.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H. (1968). Genetics variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Publications. Carnegie Institute of Washington, no. 627.Google Scholar
Loverre, A., Miola, I., Micheli, A. & Trippa, G. (1972). Descrizione di un nuovo caso di Segregation Distortion, SDRa ( = SDRanna) in Drosophila melanogaster. Bollettino di Zoologia 39, 215.Google Scholar
Mange, E. J. (1961). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VI. A preliminary report on the presence of Segregation Distortion in a Baja California population. American Naturalist 95, 8796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mange, E. J. (1968). Temperature sensitivity of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 53, 399413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miklos, G. L. Gabor (1972 a). The genetic structure of chromosomes carrying Segregation Distorter. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 14, 235243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miklos, G. L. Gabor (1972 b). An investigation of the components of Segregation Distorter system in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 70, 405418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murnik, M. R. (1971). Environmental effects on Segregation Distorter in Drosophila melanogaster: irradiation of SD-72 at the onset of spermiogenesis. Genetica 42, 457465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoletti, B. (1968). II controllo genetico della meiosi. Atti delta Associazione Genetica Italiana 13, 171.Google Scholar
Nicoletti, B. & Micheli, A. (1971). Further data on Segregation Distorter in Drosophila melanogaster. Second European Research Conference (Abstract), Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Nicoletti, B. & Trippa, G. (1967). Osservazioni citogenetiche su di un nuovo caso di Segregation Distortion (SD) rinvenuto in una popolazione naturale di Drosophila melanogaster. Atti dell'Associazione Genetica Italiana 12, 361365.Google Scholar
Nicoletti, B., Trippa, G. & De Marco, A. (1967). Reduced fertility in SD males and its bearing on Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Atti dell'Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 43, 383392.Google Scholar
Peacock, W. J. & Miklos, G. L. Gabor (1973). Meiotic drive in Drosophila: New interpretations of the Segregation Distorter and sex chromosome systems. Advances in Genetics 17, 361409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, L. (1962). A directed, permanent, genetic change involving the Segregation Distortion system in Drosophila melanogaster. American Naturalist 96, 161166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, L. & Carpenter, A. T. C. (1972). A note on the chromosomal site of action of SD in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of International Symposium of Genetics of the Spermatozoon, pp. 233246.Google Scholar
Sandler, L. & Hiraizumi, Y. (1960 a). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Instability at the Segregation Distorter locus. Genetics 45, 12691287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandler, L. & Hiraizumi, Y. (1960 b). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. V. On the nature of the SD region. Genetics 45, 16711689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandler, L. & Hiraizumi, Y. (1961). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VII. A heritable aging effect on the phenomenon of Segregation Distortion. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 3, 3446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, L. & Rosenfeld, A. (1962). A genetically induced, heritable modification of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 4, 453457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandler, L., Hiraizumi, Y. & Sandler, I. (1959). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. The cytogenetic basis of Segregation Distortion. Genetics 44, 233250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandler, L., Lindsley, D. L., Nicoletti, B. & Trippa, G. (1968). Mutants affecting meiosis in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 60, 525558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanzarella, C., Spano', V., Micheli, A. & Nicoletti, B. (1972). Localizzazione genetica e caratteristiche funzionali del fattore SDR−1 in Drosophila melanogaster. Attidell' Associazione Genetica Italiana 17, 108109.Google Scholar
Tokuyasu, K. T., Peacock, W. J. & Hardy, R. W. (1972). Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Individualization process. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung 124, 479506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trippa, G. & Loverre, A. (1972). Analisi di cromosomi secondi sensibili all'azione del cromosoma Segregation Distorter SDR−1 in Drosophila melanogaster. Atti dell' Associazione Genetica Italiana 17, 114117.Google Scholar
Trippa, G., De Marco, A., Micheli, A. & Nicoletti, B. (1974). Recovery of SD chromosomes from Drosophila melanogaster males when heterozygous with structurally different second chromosomes. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 16, 257266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trippa, G., Loverre, A., Micheli, A. & Mrola, I. (1972). Frequencies of SD chromosomes in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila Information Service 49, 81.Google Scholar
Trippa, G., Loverre, A., Rossi, A. & Valbonesi, M. (1973). Analisi citogenetica di popo-lazioni naturali di Drosophila melanogaster: Frequenza di cromosomi SD (Segregation Distorter), di cromosomi secondi letali e semiletali e di cromosomi secondi sensibili alia azione di SD. Atti dell' Associazione Genetica Italiana 18, 1112.Google Scholar
Watanabe, T. K. (1967). Persistence of lethal genes associated with SD in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Japanese Journal of Genetics 42, 375386.Google Scholar
Zimmering, S., Sandler, L. & Nicoletti, B. (1970). Mechanisms of meiotic drive. Annual Review of Genetics 4, 409436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed