Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:10:40.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Erythrocytic antigenic differences between individuals of the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

David I. Rasmussen
David I. Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Mammalian Genetics Center, Department of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Antigenic polymorphism between individuals of the subspecies Peromyscus maniculatus gracilis is demonstrated.

2. Absorption analysis of heteroimmune rabbit sera using erythrocytes of individual mice revealed two unitary complete (saline) agglutinins, designated as anti-A and anti-B, reactive to erythrocytic antigens in this species.

Isoimmunization apparently demonstrated these same antigenic differences.

3. The two antigenic characters (A and B) defined by the agglutinins are inherited as if simply related to allelic factors designated PmA and PmB respectively.

4. These two antigens are found in representatives of both the subspecies P. m. gracilis and P. m. bairdii, and, in addition, the A antigen was observed in a laboratory stock of P. polionotus. Tested individuals of the species P. leucopus and Mus musculus, however, possessed neither antigen, and samples of human blood also lacked both antigens.

5. Species-specific agglutinins distinguishing individuals of the species P. leucopus and P. maniculatus, and population-specific agglutinins which distinguished between individuals of the subspecies P. m. bairdii and P. m. gracilis, have been observed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , November 1961 , pp. 449 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

References

REFERENCES

Cohen, C. (1960). A second example of a rabbit red cell antigen resulting from interaction of two genes. J. Immunol. 84, 501–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cotterman, C. W. (1944). Serological differences in the genus Peromyscus demonstrable with normal human sera. Contr. Lab. Vertebr. Biol. Univ. Mich. 29, 1–13.Google Scholar
Dunsford, I. & Bowley, C. C. (1955). Techniques in Blood Grouping. C. C. Thomas, Springfield, I11.Google Scholar
Gorer, P. A. (1936). The detection of antigenic differences in mouse erythrocytes by the employment of immune sera. Brit. J. exp. Path. 17, 42–50.Google Scholar
Moody, P. A. (1941). Identification of mice in the genus Peromyscus by a red cell agglutination test. J. Mammal. 22, 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, P. A. (1948). Cellular antigens in three stocks of Peromyscus maniculatus from the Columbia River Valley. Contr. Lab. Vertebr. Biol. Univ. Mich. 39, 1–16.Google Scholar