Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:55:34.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrophoretic identity of proteins in a finite population and genetic distance between taxa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Wen-Hsiung Li
Wen-Hsiung Li
Affiliation:
Center for Demographic and Populations Genetics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Wehrhahn (1975) introduced the method of probability generating function to study the distribution of charge differences between homologous proteins in a population but considered only the special case where the population starts with a single allele. Some of his results, however, contained errors. In this paper, all the formulae are presented in general, correct yet much simpler forms. It is also shown that the method of diffusion equations (Ohta & Kimura, 1973) can produce the same results. Numerical computations show that the difference between the one-step and two-step models of charge changes is practically negligible. The results obtained have also been applied to study Nei's genetic distance. Numerical computations indicate that the genetic distance computed from electrophoretic data is about 10% smaller than the expected number of amino acid substitutions involving charge changes in the early stage of divergence of populations and may give a serious underestimate in comparisons between species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , October 1976 , pp. 119 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

References

REFERENCES

Avery, P. J. (1975). Extensions to the model of an infinite number of selectively neutral alleles in a finite population. Genetical Research 25, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D. H., Marshall, D. R. & Albrecht, L. (1975). Profiles of electrophoretic alleles in natural populations. Genetical Research 25, 137–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakraborty, R. & Nei, M. (1976). Bottleneck effects on average heterozygosity and genetic distance with the stepwise mutation model. Evolution (submitted).Google Scholar
Ewens, W. J. & Gillespie, J. H. (1974). Some simulation results for the neutral allele model, with interpretations. Theoretical Population Biology 6, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, G. B. (1974). On the estimation of effective number of alleles from electrophoretic data. Genetics 78, 771–776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. (1964). The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49, 725–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M. & Ohta, T. (1975). Distribution of allelic frequencies in a finite population under stepwise production of neutral alleles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (U.S.A.) 72, 2761–2764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W-H. (1976). A mixed model of mutation for electrophoretic identity of proteins within and between populations. Genetics 83, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malecot, G. (1948). Les Mathematiques de I'hérédité. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Nei, M. (1971). Interspecific gene differences and evolutionary time estimated from electrophoretic data on protein identity. American Naturalist 105, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M. (1972). Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M. (1975). Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google ScholarPubMed
Nei, M. – Chakraborty, R. (1973). Genetic distance and electrophoretic identity of proteins between taxa. Journal of Molecular Evolution 2, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohta, T. & Kimura, M. (1973). A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genetical Research 22, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, T. – Kimura, M. (1974). Simulation studies on electrophoretically detectable genetic variability in a finite population. Genetics 76, 615–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrhahn, C. F. (1975). The evolution of selectively similar electrophoretically detectable alleles in finite natural populations. Genetics 80, 375–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. (1949). Genetics of populations. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 14th ed., 10, 111, 111A–D, 112.Google Scholar