Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:39:35.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of mating systems and selection on pupa weight in Tribolium*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

S. P. Wilson ,
W. H. Kyle  and
A. E. Bell
S. P. Wilson
Affiliation:
Purdue University and United States Department of Agriculture, Lafayette Indiana, U.S.A.
W. H. Kyle
Affiliation:
Purdue University and United States Department of Agriculture, Lafayette Indiana, U.S.A.
A. E. Bell
Affiliation:
Purdue University and United States Department of Agriculture, Lafayette Indiana, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An experimental evaluation of the effect of mating systems and selection upon an additive trait thought to be highly heritable was made. There were two similar replications. Each consisted of a mass selected and randomly selected group, with five mating systems within each group.

Realized heritabilities in the mass selected lines were considerably less than was expected prior to the initiation of the experiment, and averaged approximately fourteen percentage points less than heritability estimated from the zero generation. This in turn resulted in smaller correlations between the genotypes of mates than had been previously expected in the assortatively and disassortatively mated lines.

The average response of the mass selected, assortatively mated lines was slightly more than the mass selected, randomly mated lines, though not statistically significant. This result seems to conform to theoretical expectations.

In the mass selected lines, estimates of phenotypic and genetic variance declined regardless of mating systems. There was a tendency for phenotypic variances to decrease in the randomly selected lines, but this was not the case for estimates of genetic variance.

As an aid to selection, it seems that assortative mating would be of little value with traits of low or intermediate heritability but might be useful if the trait is highly heritable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , November 1965 , pp. 341 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, A. C. (1962). Changes in quantitative traits under selection and irradiation. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
Blair, P. V. (1961). Quantitative consequences of mating systems and selection methods. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
Breese, E. L. (1956). The genetical consequences of assortative mating. Heredity, Lond. 10, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emik, L. O. & Terrill, C. E. (1949). Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J. Hered. 40, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L. (1948). The genetics of populations. Mimeographed notes.Google Scholar
McBride, G. & Robertson, A. (1963). Selection using assortative mating in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 4, 356–369.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1960). A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. R. Soc. B, 153, 234.Google Scholar
Weight, S. (1921 a). Systems of mating. II. The effects of inbreeding on the genetic composition of a population. Genetics, 6, 124–143.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1921 b). Systems of mating. III. Assortative mating based on somatic resemblance. Genetics, 6, 144–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed