Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:41:31.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of an inverted chromosome segment on intragenic recombination in another chromosome of Sordaria brevicollis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

A. F. Ahmad ,
D. J. Bond  and
H. L. K. Whitehouse
A. F. Ahmad
Affiliation:
Botany School, University of Cambridge
D. J. Bond
Affiliation:
Botany School, University of Cambridge
H. L. K. Whitehouse
Affiliation:
Botany School, University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An inverted segment in one of the chromosomes of Sordaria brevicollis has been found to have a marked effect on recombination within a gene in another chromosome. There are two effects on the intragenic recombination pattern, namely, a change in the polarity of recombination and a change in the frequency of parental and recombinant outside markers. The results support the idea that a mechanism exists for cancelling crossovers shortly after they have been formed as a means of controlling their number.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 121 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

References

REFERENCES

Ahmad, A. F. (1970). Cytogenetic studies in Sordaria brevicollis. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Bond, D. J. (1969). Genetic recombination in Sordaria brevicollis. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Carlson, P. S. (1972). The effects of inversions and the C(3)G mutation on intragenic recombination in Drosophila. Genetical Research 19, 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, K. C. (1965). The genetics of Sordaria brevicollis. I. Determination of seven linkage groups. Genetics 51, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holliday, R. (1964). A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi. Genetical Research 5, 282–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, R. (1968). Genetic recombination in Fungi, in Replication and Recombination of Genetic Material, eds. Peacock, W. J. & Brock, R. D., Australian Academy of Science (Canberra).Google Scholar
Murray, N. E. (1968). Polarized intragenic recombination in chromosome rearrangements of Neurospora. Genetics 58, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, N. E. (1969). Reversal of polarized recombination of alleles in Neurospora as a function of their position. Genetics 61, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramel, C. (1962). Interchromosomal effects of inversions in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Crossing over. Hereditas 48, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, A. G. & Fraser, F. C. (1944). Studies on the effect of X chromosome inversions on crossing over in the third chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 29, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturtevant, A. H. (1919). Inherited linkage variations in the second chromosome. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 278, 305–341.Google Scholar
Suzuki, D. T. (1963). Interchromosomal effects on crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster. II. A re-examination of X-chromosome inversion effects. Genetics 48, 1605–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1967). Secondary crossing over. Nature, Lond. 215, 1352–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1970). The mechanism of genetic recombination. Biological Reviews 45, 265–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. L. K. & Hastings, P. J. (1965). The analysis of genetic recombination on the polaron hybrid DNA model. Genetical Research 6, 27–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed