Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:25:28.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlated responses in reproductive fitness to selection in chickens*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Margrith Wehrli Verghese  and
A. W. Nordskog
Margrith Wehrli Verghese
Affiliation:
Poultry Science Department, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
A. W. Nordskog
Affiliation:
Poultry Science Department, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The correlated changes in reproductive fitness with selection for single traits for six generations in five Leghorn lines and five generations in three Fayoumi lines were analysed. The Leghorn lines, originating from crosses between four commercial strains, were: line A, selected for high egg production; lines B and C, selected for high and low nine-month body weight; and lines D and E, selected for high and low nine month egg weight. The Fayoumi lines, J, K and L, corresponding to the A, B and D Leghorn lines, respectively, were selected from a random mating population maintained over several years without selection. The breeding populations for the A and J lines each consisted of 16 sires mated to 9–16 dams each, while all the other lines were produced from eight sires, each mated to 9–16 dams. The A and J lines showed no consistent improvement in egg production or reproductive fitness and were used as control lines in this study. Body weight in the B and K lines increased by 55·8 and 45·2%, respectively, while egg weight in the D and L lines increased by 17·7 and 15·1%, respectively. The C line declined in body weight by 21·5%, while the E line declined in egg weight by 16·3%.

A reproductive fitness index was measured as the product of rate of egg production, fertility, hatchability, and percent survival of offspring from housing to nine months of age. The mean values of the fitness index as percentages of the control lines were Leghorn lines B 66, C 81, D 74, E 85 and Fayoumi lines K 54 and L 74.

Reproductive fitness and all fitness components except offspring survival declined more in the high lines than in the low lines. The body weight lines were lower in fitness than the egg weight lines, mainly because of lower rate of egg production The patterns of correlated changes in the fitness index were more regular in the Fayoumi than in the Leghorn lines. The linear regressions of fitness index on direc selection response in the K and L Fayoumi lines were statistically significant. Offspring survival contributed only 14% to the variation in the fitness index in the Leghorn lines and only 8% in the Fayoumi lines. The relative contributions to the variation in fitness index were 35% for rate of egg production, 24% for fertility and 23% for hatchability in the Leghorn lines. The corresponding figures were 35, 30 and 27% for the Fayoumi lines, respectively.

The average linear regression coefficients of fitness index on body weight, calculated on an individual hen basis (selected breeders only) within lines and generations, were - 4·77 for the B line, 11·53 for the C line, and – 1·01 for the K line. The corresponding coefficients of fitness index on egg weight in the egg weight lines were – 0·543 for the D line, 0·947 for the E line, and – 0·712 for the L line. With the exception of the K line, the regressions on body weight were larger in the body weight lines than in the egg weight lines, and, similarly, the regressions on egg weight were larger in the egg weight lines than in the body weight lines. The differences between the regression coefficients of the high and low lines were statistically significant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , June 1968 , pp. 221 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

REFERENCES

Bohren, B. B., Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. (1966). Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses to selection. Genet. Res. Camb. 7, 44–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blow, W. L. & Glazener, E. W. (1953). The effect of inbreeding on some production characters in poultry. Poul. Sci. 32, 696–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. B. & Cunningham, C. J. (1953). Effect of individual selection for broiler qualities in reproductive characters. Poult. Sci. (Abstract) 32, 893.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. (1943). Analysis of variance for percentages based on unequal numbers. J. Am. Stat. Ass. 38, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curnow, R. N. (1964). The effect of continued selection for phenotypic intermediates on gene frequency. Genetic Res. Camb. 5, 341–353.Google Scholar
Duzgunes, O. (1950). The effect of inbreeding on reproductive fitness of S. C. W. Leghorns. Poult. Sci. 29, 227–235.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. New York: Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
Festing, M. F. W. (1964). The response to selection for body weight and egg weight in the fowl. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Ames, Iowa, Library, Iowa State University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Festing, M. F. W. & Nordskog, A. W. (1967). Response to selection for body weight and egg weight in chickens. Genetics 55, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1954). The measurement of natural selection. Ninth Int. Congr. Genetics, Proc., Part 1, 480–487.Google Scholar
Kojima, K. (1959). Stable equilibria for the optimum model. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 45, 989–993.Google Scholar
Lack, D. (1954). The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Latter, B. D. H. (1960). Natural selection for an intermediate optimum. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 13, 30–35.Google Scholar
Latter, B. D. H. & Robertson, A. (1962). The effects of inbreeding and artificial selection on reproductive fitness. Genetic. Res. Camb. 3, 110–138.Google Scholar
Lerner, I. M. (1954). Genetic Homeostasis. London, England: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Lerner, I. M. (1958). The Genetic Basis of Selection. New York: Wiley, Inc.Google Scholar
Lerner, I. M. & Dempster, E. R. (1951). Attenuation of genetic progress under continued selection in poultry. Heredity 5, 75–94.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1964 a). The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General Considerations; heterotic models. Genetics 49, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. (1964 b). The interaction of selection and linkage. II. Optimum models. Genetics 50, 757–782.Google Scholar
Maloney, M. A., Gilbreath, J. C. & Morrison, R. D. (1963). Two-way selection for bodyweight in chickens. Okla. Agric. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. T-99.Google Scholar
Mather, K. & Harrison, B. J. (1949). The manifold effects of selection. Heredity 3, 1–52.Google Scholar
Nordskog, A. W. & Festing, M. F. W. (1962). Selection and correlated responses in the fowl. Twelfth World's Poultry Congr. Proc. 2, 25–29.Google Scholar
Nordskog, A. W., Festing, M. & Verghese, M. W. (1967). Selection for egg production and correlated responses in the fowl. Genetics 55, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, A. (1956). The effect of selection against extreme deviants based on deviation or on homozygosis. J. Genetics 54, 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, B. L. (1963). Studies in artificial selection of quantitative characters. II. Selection for body weight in Drosophila rnelanogaster. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 16, 516–541.Google Scholar
Shultz, F. T. (1953). Concurrent inbreeding and selection in the domestic fowl. Heredity 7, 1–21.Google Scholar
Snedecor (1956). Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Stephenson, A. B., Wyatt, A. J. & Nordskog, A. W. (1953). Influence of inbreeding on egg production in the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci. 32, 510–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tebb, G. (1958). Intra-generation inbreeding effects in a poultry flock selected for egg production. Heredity 12, 285–299.Google Scholar
Wehrli, M. (1964). Effects of artificial selection on reproductive fitness in the fowl. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Ames, Iowa, Library, Iowa State University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1935). Evolution in populations in approximate equilibrium. J. Genet. 30, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1940). Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation. Am. Nat. 74, 232–248.Google Scholar
Wright, S. & McPhee, H. C. (1925). An approximate method of calculating coefficients of inbreeding and relationship from livestock pedigrees. J. Agric. Res. 31, 377–383.Google Scholar