Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:27:31.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Complementation and enzyme studies of revertants induced in an am mutant of N. crassa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

J. A. Pateman
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge
J. R. S. Fincham
Affiliation:
John Innes Institute, Bayfordbury, Hertford, Herts.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A total of eighty-seven revertants were induced by ultra-violet light in an am3 strain. All of these revertants appear to be the result of mutation at sites in or close to the am locus. Fourteen of the eighty-seven revertants were partial revertants in that under some conditions of assay they possessed low glutamate dehydrogenase activity compared with the wild-type although their growth rate was similar to that of the wild-type. Enzyme extracts of thirteen of the partial revertants were assayed for glutamate dehydrogenase in various ways in order to establish qualitative distinctions between different kinds of mutant enzyme. On the basis of these tests six different groups were established, of which one contained six revertants, one three and the others one. All except one of the mutant enzyme types showed a marked activation when incubated with α-oxoglutarate plus NADPH2, and all of these had Michaelis constants for ammonium ion much higher than is found for the wild-type enzyme. The remaining group of three revertants gave, at first, no enzyme activity in any of the assay systems. Two of these (the third was not tested) were shown to produce an enzyme variety which becomes quite inactive in phosphate buffer at pH 8·0 but can be fully activated by the addition of ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid. Forced heterocaryons between each of six partial revertants and eleven am mutants were made and the resultant sixty-six heterocaryons assayed for glutamate dehydrogenase activity. The partial revertants differed among themselves in their complementation characteristics. Some complemented with none of the am mutants, some with am1 only, and some with am1 or with am7. The complementation tests confirmed the differences established by the enzyme studies. The data presented here, together with previous work, demonstrate that ultra-violet light induced mutation in an am strain can result in at least eight types of revertant differing from each other in respect of the glutamate dehydrogenase variety which each can produce.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

References

REFERENCES

Beadle, G. W. & Tatum, E. L. (1945). Methods of producing and detecting mutations concerned with nutritional requirements. Am. J. Bot. 32, 678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, J. R. S. (1957). A modified glutamic dehydrogenase as a result of gene mutation in Neurospora crassa. Biochem. J. 65, 721728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, J. R. S. (1959). The role of chromosomal loci in enzyme formation. Proc. IX int. Congr. Genet. 1, 355363.Google Scholar
Fincham, J. R. S. (1962). Genetically determined multiple forms of glutamate dehydrogenase in Neurospora crassa. J. molec. Biol. 4, 257274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, J. R. S. & Bond, P. A. (1960). A further genetic variety of glutamic acid dehydrogenase in Neurospora crassa. Biochem. J. 77, 97105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, J. R. S. & Coddington, A. (1963). Complementation at the am locus of Neurospora crassa: a reaction between two different mutant forms of glutamate dehydrogenase. J. molec. Biol. 6, 361373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, J. R. S. & Stadler, D. R. (1964). Complementation relationships of Neurospora am mutants in relation to their formation of abnormal varieties of glutamate dehydrogenase. Genet. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
Horowitz, N. H. (1953). Effect of sampling error on the detection of crossovers in Ascomycetes. Microb. Genet. Bull. 8, 8.Google Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosenbrough, N. J., Farr, N. J. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurements with the Folin phenol reagent. J. biol. Chem. 193, 265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pateman, J. A. (1957). Backmutation studies at the am locus in Neurospora crassa. J. Genet. 55, 444455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, J. A. (1960). High negative interference at the am locus in Neurospora crassa. Genetics, 45, 839846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, T. K. & Fincham, J. R. S. (1964). A mutant enzyme in Neurospora interconvertible between electrophoretically distinct active and inactive forms. J. molec. Biol. (in press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogel, J. H. (1956). A convenient growth medium for Neurospora (Medium N). Genet. Bull. 13, 42.Google Scholar
Westergaard, M. & Mitchell, H. K. (1947). Neurospora. V. A synthetic medium favouring sexual reproduction. Am. J. Bot. 34, 573578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar