Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:13:19.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of some biological characteristics of the mouse-passaged scrapie agents, 22A and ME7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

A. G. Dickinson  and
Veronica M. H. Meikle
A. G. Dickinson
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organization, Edinburgh 9
Veronica M. H. Meikle
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organization, Edinburgh 9
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two mouse-adapted scrapie agents of different sheep origin were compared. The titre, reached in the brains of mice in the terminal stage of scrapie, is of the same order for both agents. There is a threefold difference between the incubation periods of the two agents in some mouse strains, of which C57 is one, and in this strain incubation of the 22A agent, given as a large dose by a peripheral route, occupies almost the whole life-span.

The most fundamental difference between the agents concerns the reversal of the ranking of incubation periods, typically in the VM and C57 mouse strams: incubation of ME7 in VM takes almost twice as long as in C57, whereas most sub-lines of 22A take half as long in VM as in C57. The implications of this type of host-genotype, agent-strain interaction are discussed in terms of the possible nature of agent differences, the possibility of latent infection and the consequences for scrapie eradication programmes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 1969 , pp. 213 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

REFERENCES

Dickinson, A. G. & Mackay, J. K. M. (1964). Genetical control of the incubation period in mice of the neurological disease, scrapie. Heredity 19, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, A. G., Meikle, V. M. H. & Fraser, H. (1968). Identification of a gene which controls the incubation period of some strains of scrapie agent in mice. J. comp. Path. 78, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, A. G. & Stamp, J. T. (1969). Experimental scrapie in Cheviot and Suffolk sheep. J. comp. Path. 79, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, A. G., Stamp, J. T., Renwick, C. C. & Rennie, J. C. (1968). Some factors controlling the incidence of scrapie in Cheviot sheep injected with a Cheviot-passaged scrapie agent. J. comp. Path. 78, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, A. G., Young, G. B., Stamp, J. T. & Renwick, C. C. (1965). An analysis of natural scrapie in Suffolk sheep. Heredity 20, 485–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, H. & Dickinson, A. G. (1967). Distribution of experimentally induced scrapie lesions in the brain. Nature, Lond. 216, 1310–1311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, G. D., Millson, G. C. & Chandler, R. L. (1963). Observations on the comparative infectivity of cellular fractions derived from homogenates of mouse-scrapie brain. Res. vet. Sci. 4, 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattison, I. H. (1966). The relative susceptibility of sheep, goats and mice to two types of the goat scrapie agent. Rea. vet. Sci. 7, 207–212.Google Scholar
Pattison, I. H. & Jones, K. M. (1968). Modification of a strain of mouse-adapted scrapie by passage through rats. Res. vet. Sci. 9, 408–410.Google Scholar
Sigurdsson, B. (1954). Rida, a chronic encephalitis of sheep with general remarks on infections which develop slowly and some of their special characteristics. Brit. vet. J. 110, 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamp, J. T. (1967). Scrapie and its wider implications. Br. med. Bull. 23, 133–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zlotnik, I. & Rennie, J. C. (1963). Further observations on the experimental transmission of scrapie from sheep and goats to laboratory mice. J. comp. Path. 73, 150–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed