Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:38:25.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chromosomal basis of dosage compensation in Drosophila: I. Cellular autonomy of hyperactivity of the male X-chromosome in salivary glands and sex differentiation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

S. C. Lakhotia  and
A. S. Mukherjee
S. C. Lakhotia
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta, 35 Ballygunge Circular Road, Calcutta 19, India
A. S. Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta, 35 Ballygunge Circular Road, Calcutta 19, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Morphology and the rate of RNA synthesis of the X-chromosome in XX/XO mosaic larval salivary glands of Drosophila melanogaster have been examined. For this purpose the unstable ring-X was utilized to produce XX and XO nuclei in the same pair of glands. The width of the X-chromosome and the left arm of the 3rd chromosome (3L) of larval salivary glands was measured and the rate of RNA synthesis by them was studied upon the use of [3H]uridine autoradiography in such XX (female) and XO (male) nuclei developing in a female background (i.e. otherwise genotypically XX). In such mosaic glands the width of the single X-chromosome of male nuclei is nearly as great as that of the paired two X's of female nuclei, as is also the case in normal male (X Y) and female (XX). The single X of male nuclei synthesizes RNA at a rate equal to that of the paired two X's of female nuclei and nearly twice that of an unpaired X of XX nuclei. Neither the developmental physiology of the sex nor the proportion of XO nuclei in a pair of mosaic salivary glands of an XX larva has any influence on these two characteristics of the male X-chromosome.

It is suggested that dosage compensation in Drosophila is achieved chiefly, if not fully, by a hyperactivity of the male X, in contrast to the single X inactivation in female mammals, that this hyperactivity of the male X is expressed visibly in the morphology and metabolic activity of the X-chromosome in the larval salivary glands of the male, and that this hyperactivity and therefore dosage compensation in Drosophila in general is not dependent on sex-differentiation, but is a function of the doses of the X-chromosome itself.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , October 1969 , pp. 137 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

REFERENCES

Aronson, J. F., Rudkin, G. T. & Schultz, J. (1954). A comparison of giant X-chromosomes in male and female Drosophila melanogaster by cytophotometry in the ultraviolet. J. Histo-chem. Cytochem. 2, 458–459.Google Scholar
Beermann, W. (1964). Control of differentiation at the chromosomal level. J. exp. Zool. 157, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berendes, H. D. (1966). Differential replication of male and female X-chromosomes in Drosophila. Chromosoma 20, 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berendes, H. D. (1967). Controlled induction of gene activity in polytene chromosomes. Proc. Symp. on ‘La basi molecolari del differenziamento’, pp. 179–187. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (Rome).Google Scholar
Berendes, H. D., Van Breugel, F. M. A. & Holt, Th. K. H. (1965). Experimental puffs in salivary gland chromosomes of Drosophila hydei. Chromosoma 16, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, C. B. & Brehme, K. S. (1944). The mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Pubis Carnegie Instn, no. 552.Google Scholar
Brown, E. H. & King, R. C. (1961). Studies on the expression of the transformer gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 46, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobzhansky, Th. (1957). The X-chromosome in the larval salivary glands of hybrids of D. insularis × D. tropicalis. Chromosoma 8, 691–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forward, K. J. & Kaufmann, B. P. (1967). The bipartite nature of the salivary-gland X chromosome. D.I.S. 42, 90–91.Google Scholar
Gersh, E. S. (1968). Chromatid asynapsis in salivary gland nuclei. D.I.S. 43, 124–125.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, R. B. (1954). Different philosophies of Genetics. Science, N. Y. 119, 703–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldschmidt, R. B. (1955). Theoretical Genetics, pp. 356–358. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Komma, D. J. (1966). Effect of sex-transformation genes on glucose-6-phosphate dehydro-genase activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 54, 497–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, G. L. (1968). Dosage compensation as a developmental phenomenon in Drosophila. Genet. Res., Camb. 11, 115–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, A. S. (1965). The effect of sexcombless on the forelegs of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 51, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, A. S. (1966). Dosage compensation in Drosophila: an autoradiographic study. Nucleus, Calcutta, 9, 83–96.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A. S. & Beermann, W. (1965). Synthesis of RNA by the X-chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster and the problem of dosage compensation. Nature, Land. 207, 785–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, A. S., Lakhotia, S. C. & Chatterjee, S. N. (1968). On the molecular and chromosomal basis of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Proc. Int. Seminar on ‘Chromosome—its Structure and function’, held in Calcutta, Aug. 1968; ed. Sharma, A. K.. Nucleus, Calcutta, Symp. Vol., pp. 161–173.Google Scholar
Muller, H. J. (1950). Evidence of the precision of genetic adaptation. Harvey Lect. 43,(1947–1948), 165–229.Google Scholar
Muller, H. J. & Kaplan, W. D. (1966). The dosage compensation in Drosophila and mammals as showing accuracy of the normal type. Genet. Res., Camb. 8, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novitski, E. (1951). Autonomy of sterility of transformed females. D.I.S. 25, 121.Google Scholar
Offermann, C. A. (1936). Branched chromosomes as symmetrical duplications. J. Genet. 32, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C. (1964). Ribonukleinsäure-Synthese der Riesenchromosomen. Autoradio-graphische Untersuchungen an Chironomus tentans. Chromosoma 15, 71–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodman, T. C. (1968). Relationship of developmental stage to initiation of replication in polytene nuclei. Chromosoma 23, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudkin, G. T. (1964). The proteins in polytene chromosomes. In The Nucleohistones, ed. Bonner, J. and Ts'o, P.. San Francisco: Holden Day Inc.Google Scholar
Russell, L. B. (1964). Another look at the single-active-X hypothesis. Trans. N.Y. Acad.Sci. (II), 26, 726–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, J. (1965). Genes, differentiation and animal development. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 18, 116–147.Google ScholarPubMed
Seidel, S. (1963). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Sterilität von Transformer — (tra) Männchen bei Drosophila melanogaster. Z. Vererb Lehre 94, 215–241.Google Scholar
Smith, P. D. & Lucchesi, J. C. (1968). The role of sexuality in dosage compensation in Drosophila. Genetics 60, 227 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Stern, C. (1960). Dosage compensation—development of a concept and new facts. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 2, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, C. (1968). Genetic Mosaics and Other Essays. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard UniversityPress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturtevaut, A. H. (1945). A gene in Drosophila melanogaster that transforms females into males. Genetics 30, 297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar