Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:05:17.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chromosomal anomalies that cause male sterility in the mouse also reduce ovary size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Ursula Mittwoch
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Biometry, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE
Shantha Mahadevaiah
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Biometry, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE
Leslie A. Setterfield
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Biometry, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two male-sterile chromosome anomalies, the insertion Is(7; 1)40H and the tertiary trisomy, Ts(512)31H, were found to be associated with reduced ovarian volumes in immature females. Together with the reciprocal translocation, T(11; 19)42H, in which this effect was described previously, reduced ovaries have been found in all three male-sterile chromosome anomalies investigated so far, suggesting that ovarian involvement is likely to be common in these conditions. Assuming that the smaller ovarian size reflects a reduction in the number of oocytes, it is suggested that male-sterile chromosome anomalies may exert basically similar deleterious effects on meiotic germ cells in males and females, the difference in outcome being due to cell-physiological differences between spermatocytes and oocytes and to the small number of surviving oocytes required for fertility in females.

Type
Short Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

REFERENCES

Beechey, C. V., Kirk, M. & Searle, A. G. (1980). A reciprocai translocation induced in an oocyte and affecting fertility in male mice. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 27, 129146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoyne, P. S. & Baker, T. G. (1984). Meiotic pairing and gametogenic failure. In Controlling Events in Meiosis, 38th Symposium Society of Experimental Biology ed. Evans, C. W. and Dickinson, H. G.), in press: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eicher, E. M. & Washburn, L. L. (1978). Assignment of genes to regions of mouse chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 75, 946950.Google Scholar
Epstein, C. J. (1969). Mammalian oocytes: X chromosome activity. Science 163, 10781079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forejt, J. & Gregorová, S. (1977). Meiotic studies of translocations causing male sterility in the mouse. I. Autosomal reciprocal translocations. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 19, 159179.Google Scholar
Green, M. C. (ed.) (1981). Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse. Stuttgart: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Lifschytz, E. & Lindsley, D. L. (1972). The role of X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 69, 182186.Google Scholar
Lyon, M. F. & Meredith, R. (1966). Autosomal translocation causing male sterility and viable aneuploidy in the mouse. Cytogenetics 5, 335354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miklos, G. L. C. (1974). Sex-chromosome pairing and male sterility. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 13, 558577.Google Scholar
Mittwoch, U. (1982). The difficulties of becoming a father - aspects of male fertility and of testicular differentiation. In Genetic Control of Gamete Production and function. (ed. Crossignani, P. G., Rubin, B. L. and Fraccaro, M.), pp. 2131. London. Academic Press; New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Mittwoch, U., Mahadevaiah, S. & Olive, M. B. (1981). Retardation of ovarian growth in male-sterile mice carrying an autosomal translocation. Journal of Medical Genetics 18, 414417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searle, A. G. (1982). The genetics of sterility in the mouse. In Genetic Control of Gamete Production and function (ed. Crossignani, P. G., Rubin, B. L. and Fraccaro, M.), pp. 93114. London: Academic Press; New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Searle, A. G., Beechey, C. V. & Evans, E. P. (1978). Meiotic effects in chromosomally derived male sterility of mice. Annales de Biologie animale, Biochimie et Biophysique 18, 391398.Google Scholar
Searle, A. G., Beechey, C. V., De Boer, P., DeRooij, D. G., Evans, E. P. & Kirk, M. (1983). A male-sterile insertion in the mouse. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 36, 617626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed