Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:46:13.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calcium chloride effects on nuclear development in Tetrahymena

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

D. L. Nanney
D. L. Nanney
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Development, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Conjugating pairs of syngen 1 exposed to 0·1 M-CaCl2 during the time of macronuclear development often abort the new macronuclei and retain the old macronucleus and its associated phenotypes. The new micro-nucleus is retained, however, so that macro–micro heterocaryons can be constructed. Because the macronucleus is from a sexually mature strain, the heterocaryon is capable of mating immediately, without passing a period of sexual immaturity. Macronuclear abortion may prove a useful short-cut in genetic analysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 1976 , pp. 297 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

References

REFERENCES

Allen, S. L. (1967 a). A rapid means for inducing homozygous diploid lines in Tetrahymena pyriformis, syngen 1. Science 155, 575–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, S. L. (1967 b). Cytogenetics of genomic exclusion in Tetrahymena. Genetics 55, 797–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, S. L. & Lee, P. H. T. (1971). The preparation of congenic strains of Tetrahymena. Journal of Protozoology 18, 214–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, J. D. (1973). Selective inhibition of DNA synthesis in macronuclear fragments in Paramecium aurelia exconjugants and its reversal during macronuclear regeneration. Chromosoma 44, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruns, P. J. & Brussard, T. B. (1974). Positive selection for mating with functional heterokaryons in Tetrahymena pyriformis. Genetics 78, 831–841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallet, M. (1972). Effect du chlorure de calcium sur le déterminisme génétique du type sexuel chez Paramecium aurelia (Souche 60, syng. 1). Protistologica 8, 387–396.Google Scholar
Nanney, D. L. (1956). Caryonidal inheritance and nuclear differentiation. American Naturalist 90, 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanney, D. L. (1962). Anomalous serotypes in Tetrahymena. Journal of Protozoology 9, 485–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanney, D. L. & Dubert, J. M. (1960). The genetics of the H serotype system in variety 1 of Tetrahymena pyriformis. Genetics 45, 1335–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orias, E. & Bruns, P. J. (1975). Induction and isolation of mutants in Tetrahymena. Methods in Cell Biology 2 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Orias, E. & Flacks, M. (1973). Use of genomic exclusion to isolate heat-sensitive mutants in Tetrahymena. Genetics 73, 543–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonneborn, T. M. (1937). Sex, sex inheritance and sex determination in Paramecium aurelia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 23, 378–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonneborn, T. M. (1940). The relation of macronuclear regeneration in Paramecium aurelia to macronuclear structure, amitosis and genetic determination. Anatomical Record 78 (suppl.), 53–54.Google Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1947). Recent advances in the genetics of Paramecium and Euplotes. Advances in Genetics 1, 263–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonneborn, T. M. (1950). Methods in the general biology and genetics of Paramecium aurelia. Journal of Experimental Zoology 113, 87–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1954 a). Is gene K active in the micronucleus of Paramecium aurelia? Microbial Genetics Bulletin 11, 25–26.Google Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1954 b). Patterns of nucleocytoplasmic integration in Paramecium. Caryologia (suppl.), 307–325.Google Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1970). Methods in Paramecium research. Methods in Cell Physiology 4, 241–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1975). Species designations and descriptions of the 14 syngens of Paramecium aurelia. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 94, 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar