Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:31:40.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biochemical analysis of genetic differences in the growth of Drosophila

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Robert B. Church  and
Forbes W. Robertson
Robert B. Church
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
Forbes W. Robertson
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Lines of Drosophila melanogaster, which differ greatly in body size and/or development time, have been created by selecting for either large or small body size or longer or shorter development time on different chemically defined axenic media. The ten lines studied here have been selected either on the optimum medium or on media deficient in either protein, ribonucleic acid or choline.

2. The lines show a variable degree of correlation between adult size and the duration of the larval period. Selection for one trait may involve a positively correlated change in the other or have no such effect. There is a fairly regular association between the composition of the diet and the presence or absence of evidence for genetic correlation.

3. The biochemical composition of the various lines, and also the unselected stock from which they were derived, has been compared at successive stages from egg to adult in animals grown on the optimum axenic diet. Records of wet weight, protein, RNA and DNA content per individual have revealed differences in composition which can be releated to characteristic differences in the response to selection.

4. Comparisons between the individual content of the various constituents at the critical size, i.e. at the time in early third instar when larvae can complete development even if no longer allowed to feed, and in newly emerged adults indicate a high positive correlation between DNA content and the time to reach the critical size and also the time to pupation. Protein and RNA content, on the other hand, may vary within wide limits without alteration of the development time. The association between DNA content and development time which underlies the correlation between body size and development time, is related to the rate of DNA synthesis in early larval life, such that the rate of synthesis tends to be negatively correlated with the absolute DNA content at the critical size and in the adult.

5. Since the protein/DNA ratio is comparatively unchanged in lines with correlated changes in body size and development time, but varies widely in lines in which development time is unaltered, the contrasts may reflect, in adults at least, differences in respectively cell number or cell size.

6. An earlier hypothesis of the origin of correlated and uncorrelated changes in body size and development time has been modified. It appears that the absolute critical size is positively correlated with the size of the adult, whether or not changes in development time have occurred. The intrinsic differences in growth operate from very early stages of development. This has been demonstrated in the differences in RNA/DNA ratio in early larval life and also in a high correlation between the time to complete development in the egg and the time to reach critical size after hatching from the egg.

7. There is also evidence, in the relative deviations from unselected of the various estimated constituents, of partial independence of growth between early and late larval life, and this may reflect differences in the growth of the imaginal discs.

8. The data are discussed in relation to earlier experimental evidence relating to the growth of Drosophila. The point is made that judicious selection for appropriate parameters of growth will often create differences great enough to reveal developmental interrelations which would otherwise be difficult to detect.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , June 1966 , pp. 383 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Bakker, K., (1959). Feeding period, growth and pupation in larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Entomologia exp. appl. 2, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenstein, D. (1950). The postembryonic development of Drosophila in ‘Biology of Drosophila’ (Demeree, , ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Burton, K. (1956). A study of the conditions and mechanism of the diphenylamine reaction for the colorimetric estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem. J. 62, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, R. B. & Robertson, F. W.A biochemical study of the growth of Drosophila melanogaster. (in press).Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M., Maynard Smith, J. & Sondhi, K. C. (1961). Asymmetrical response to selection for rate of development in Drosophila subobscura. Genet. Res. 2, 70–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. N. & Leslie, I. (1950). A new approach in the biochemistry of growth and development. Nature, Lond. 165, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dische, Z. (1930). Über einige neue charakteristische Farbreaktionen der Thynonukleinsaure und eine Mikromethode zur bestimmung derselben in tierischen Organen mit hilfe dieser Reaktionen. Mikrochemie, 8, 4–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, I. & Davidson, J. N. (1951). The chemical composition of the chick embryonic cell. Biochim. biophys. Acta, 7, 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenbook, L., Travaglini, E. C. & Schultz, J. (1958). Nucleic acids and their components as affected by the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Constitution and amount of the ribonucleic acids in the unfertilized egg. Expl. Cell Res. 15, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Roserbrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. biol. Chem. 193, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makino, S. (1938). A morphological study of the nuclei in various kinds of somatic cells of Drosophila virilis. Cytologia, 9, 272–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1959 a). Gene-environmental interaction in relation to the nutrition and growth of Drosophila. Biol. Cont. Univ. Texas, Pub. No. 5914, 89–98.Google Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1959 b). Studies in quantitative inheritance XII. Cell size and number in relation to genetic and environmental variation in body size in Drosophila. Genetics, 44, 869–896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, F. W. (1959 c). Studies in quantitative inheritance. XIII. Interrelations between genetic behavior and development in the cellular constitution of the Drosophila wing. Genetics 44, 113–130.Google ScholarPubMed
Robertson, F. W. (1960). The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 1. Body size and development time on different diets. Genet. Res. 1, 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1961). The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 4. The influence of larval nutrition on the manifestation of dominance. Genet. Res. 2, 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1963). The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 6. The genetic correlation between the duration of the larval period and body size in relation to larval diet. Genet. Res. 4, 74–92.Google Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1964). The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 7. The role of canalization in the stability of growth relations. Genet. Res. 5, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, J. H. (1956). The quantitative nutritional requirements of Drosophila melanogaster. J. exp. Biol. 33, 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, J. H. (1959). Utilization of dietary purines and pyrimidines by Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. B, 66, 339–359.Google Scholar
Sang, J. H. & Clayton, G. A. (1957). Selection for larval development time in Drosophila. J. Hered. 48, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Hogeboom, G. & Ross, H. (1950). Intracellular distribution of enzymes. VII. The distribution of nucleic acids and adenosinetriphosphatase in normal mouse liver and mouse hepatoma. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 10, 977–987.Google ScholarPubMed
Vendrely, R. (1955). The deoxyribonucleic acid content of the nucleus. In The Nucleic Acids (Chargaff, and Davidson, , eds.), Vol. 11, pp. 155–180. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar