Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:33:57.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are geographic populations equivalent to genetic populations in biennial species? A study using Verbascum virgatum (Scrophulariaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Harrington Wells  and
Patrick H. Wells
Harrington Wells
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, U.S.A.
Patrick H. Wells
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Occidental College, 1600 Campus Road, Los Angeles, California 90041, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Geographic populations are not necessarily equivalent to genetic populations. Electrophoretic isozyme analysis shows that in the biennial, Verbascum virgatum, not only is spatial distribution a factor creating isolated populations, but time also is an isolating mechanism. Thus, in the biennial situation there is a possibility that selection can be rejected as the probable cause of variation, much as can random drift in cases involving spatial distributions. The magnitudeof difference infrequency of alleles between the odd and even year colonies studied was too large to be explained by random drift in populations of the size and short duration of those we observed. Similarly, it is unlikely that random fluctuations in selection intensity on one age class would produce a difference as large as that observed. It is possible, however, that variation was introduced (mutation or founder) when the population was much smaller and that the difference was trapped at a relatively high level when the population rapidly increased in size. Simulations and algebraic theory do not refute this idea. They also show that colony differentiation can occur with migration rates considerably greater than previously predicted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , August 1980 , pp. 17 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Aspinwall, N. (1974). Genetic analysis of North American populations of the pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha, possible evidence for the neutral mutation-random drift hypothesis. Evolution 28, 295–305.Google Scholar
Bailey, N. T. J. (1975). Statistical Methods in Biology. Oxford: The English University Press.Google Scholar
Clegg, M. T., Allard, R. W. & Kahler, A. L. (1972). Is the gene the unit of selection? Evidence from two experimental plant populations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 69, 2474–2478.Google Scholar
Cleland, R. E. (1949). Phylogenetic relationships in Oenothera. Hereditas, suppl. vol., 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, R. E. (1950). Studies in Oenothera Cytogenetics and Phylogeny. Indiana University Publications, Science Series No. 16.Google Scholar
Cleland, R. E. (1962). The cytogenetics of Oenothera. Advances in Genetics 11, 147–237.Google Scholar
Cleland, R. E. (1964). The evolutionary history of the North American evening primroses of the ‘biennis group’. Proceedings American Philosophical Society 108, 88–98.Google Scholar
Cleland, R. E. (1972). Oenothera: Cytogenetics and Evolution. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hart, R. (1977). Why are biennials so few? The American Naturalist 111, 792–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. B. (1975). Use of internal standards in electrophoretic surveys of enzyme polymorphism. Biochemical Genetics 13, 833–843.Google Scholar
Kahler, A. L., Clegg, M. T. & Allabd, R. W. (1975). Evolutionary changes in the mating, system of an experimental population of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 72, 943–946.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1953). ‘Stepping stone’ model of population. Annual Report, National Institute of Genetics, Japan 3, 62–63.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. & Maruyama, T. (1971). Pattern of neutral polymorphism in a geographically structured population. Genetical Research 18, 125–130.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. & Weiss, C. H. (1964). The stepping stone model of population structure and decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics 49, 561–576.Google Scholar
Larntz, K. (1978). Small sample comparisons of exact levels for Chi-square goodness of fit statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 73, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. & Levin, D. A. (1975). Genetic heterozygosity and variation in permanent translocation heterozygotes of the Oenothera biennis complex. Genetics 79, 493–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, M., Steiner, E. & Levin, D. A. (1975). Allozyme genetics in permanent translocation heterozygotes of the genus Oenothera. Biochemical Genetics 13, 487–500.Google Scholar
Maruyama, T. (1970). Rate of decrease of genetic variability in a subdivided population. Biometrika 57, 249–311.Google Scholar
Maruyama, T. (1971). The rate of decrease of heterozygosity in a population occupying a circular or a linear habitat. Genetics 67, 437–453.Google Scholar
Munz, P. A. (1949). The Oenothera hookeri group. Aliso 2, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munz, P. A. (1965). Onagraceae. North American Flora 5, 1–287.Google Scholar
Munz, P. A. & Keck, D. D. (1970). A California Flora. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nei, M., Maruyama, T. & Chakraborth, R. (1975). The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29, 1–10.Google Scholar
Platt, W. J. & Weiss, I. M. (1977). Resource partitioning and competition within a guild of fugitive prairie species. The American Naturalist 111, 479–513.Google Scholar
Schaffer, W. M. & Gadgil, M. D. (1975). Selection for optimal life histories in plants. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. R. & Prasad, R. (1970). Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes – a compilation of recipes. Biochemical Genetics 4, 279–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiess, E. B. (1977). Genes in Populations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wells, H. & King, J. L. (1980). An exact test for n × m contingency tables. In preparation. Copies available.Google Scholar
Werner, P. (1976). Ecology of plant populations in successional environments. Systematic Botany 1, 246–268.Google Scholar
Yarnold, J. K. (1970). The minimum expectation in the χ2 goodness of fit test. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65, 864–886.Google Scholar