Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:19:37.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of quantitative inheritance of body size in mice: V. Effects of small numbers of polygenes on similar genetic backgrounds*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

C. K. Chai
C. K. Chai
Affiliation:
The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sublines carrying isolated polygenes determining body size, developed by selection and repeated backcrossing to the LG and SM strains of mice, were inbred by full-sib matings with concomitant selection to study the inheritance of body size, using birth, weaning (28-day) and 60-day body weights as indices.

Mean body weights in those sublines backcrossed to SM and selected for large body size were greater than in those selected for small body size, proving that the difference resulting from seven earlier generations of backcrossing and selection, although small, was genetic and could be fixed by inbreeding. The mean body weights of the sublines selected for small body size drifted upward despite downward selection, a phenomenon thought to be due to the pressure of natural selection outweighing that of artificial selection.

In the sublines developed from backcrosses to the LG strain, mice from lines selected for small body size attained a mean body weight greater than that of mice from lines selected for large body size and also than of the parental LG strain. These results were contrary to expectation and a genetic interpretation was offered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , June 1968 , pp. 239 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

REFERENCES

Chai, C. K. (1956 a). Analysis of quantitative inheritance of body size in mice. I. Hybridization and maternal influence. Genetics 41, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chai, C. K. (1956 b). Analysis of quantitative inheritance of body size in mice. II. Gene action and segregation. Genetics 41, 167–178.Google ScholarPubMed
Chai, C. K. (1957). Analysis of quantitative inheritance of body size in mice. III. Dominance. Genetics 42, 601–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chai, C. K. (1961). Analysis of quantitative inheritance of body size in mice. IV. An attempt to isolate polygenes. Genet. Res. 2, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chai, C. K. (1966). Characteristics in inbred mouse populations plateaued by directional selection. Genetics 54, 743–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rendel, J. M. & Sheldon, B. L. (1960). Selection for canalization of the scute phenotype in D. melanogaster. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 13, 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoday, J. M. (1961). Location of polygenes. Nature, Lond. 191, 368–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar