Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:40:40.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in populations of Drosophila melanogaster: 3. Differences in developmental times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

W. Van Delden  and
A. Kamping
W. Van Delden
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Biology Centre, University of Groningen, 9751 NN Haren (Gn), The Netherlands
A. Kamping
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Biology Centre, University of Groningen, 9751 NN Haren (Gn), The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From the F2 ratios of crosses between Drosophila melanogaster strains homozygous for the AdhF(F) and the Adhs(S) allele it has been concluded that the developmental time of FF homozygotes is shorter than that of SS homozygotes. This difference is found to be reinforced by increasing levels of crowding. A further analysis of developmental times has been performed by the transfer of larvae to agar medium after they have stayed for periods of variable length on regular food. From the percentage of emerging adults it can be concluded that FF larvae and, to a lesser extent FS larvae, either reach their critical weights for pupation earlier than SS larvae or possess a lower critical weight. These differences in developmental time influence the course of allele frequencies. Between populations kept on a 2-week transfer schedule and on a 3-week schedule a divergence of allele frequencies is observed, in the former a decrease in S frequency occurs. The relevance of the observed differences in developmental time for the maintenance of the Adh polymorphism is discussed for laboratory populations kept on regular food and at varying densities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , February 1979 , pp. 15 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

References

REFERENCES

Bakker, K. (1961). An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Archives Neerlandaises de Zoologie 14, 200–281.Google Scholar
Bakker, K. (1969). Selection for rate of growth and its influence on competitive ability of larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 19, 541–595.Google Scholar
Bijlsma-Meeles, E. & van Delden, W. (1974). Intra- and interpopulation selection concerning the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 247, 369–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briscoe, D. A., Robertson, A. & Malpica, J. M. (1975). Dominance at the Adh locus in response of adult Drosophila melanogaster to environmental alcohol. Nature 255, 148–149.Google Scholar
Burnet, B., Sewell, D. & Bos, M. (1977). Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Growth relations and competition between selected lines. Genetical Research 30, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, T. H., Hillier, P. C. & Clarke, B. (1974 a). Properties of genetically polymorphic isozymes of alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochemical Genetics 11, 141–153.Google Scholar
Day, T. H., Hillier, P. C. & Clarke, B. (1974 b). The relative quantities and catalytic activities of enzymes produced by alleles at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochemical Genetics 11, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jong, G. (1976). A model of competition for food. 1. Frequency-dependent viabilities. American Naturalist 110, 1013–1027.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1947). Probit Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. B. (1970). Enzyme flexibility in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 227, 959–960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J. B. & Miklovich, R. (1971). Modes of variation in alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia 27, 99–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamping, A. & van Delden, W. (1978). The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 2. The relation between ADH activity and adult mortality. Biochemical Genetics 16, 541–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojima, K. & Tobari, Y. N. (1969). The pattern of viability changes associated with genotype frequency at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 61, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. C. (1964). Introduction to Experimental Statistics. New York, N.Y.: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Morgan, P. (1975). Selection acting directly on an enzyme polymorphism. Heredity 34, 124–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, J. G. (1976). Selection at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster imposed by environmental ethanol. Genetical Research 26, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, J. G. (1977). Variation in the direction of selection applied by pentenol to the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 30, 259–267.Google Scholar
Rasmuson, B., Nelson, L. R. & Rasmuson, M. (1966). Effects of heterozygosity on alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 56, 313–316.Google Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1963). The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila melanogaster. 6. The genetic correlation between the duration of the larval period and body size in relation to larval diet. Genetical Research 4, 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. N. & Kaiser, T. N. (1977). Selection upon slow-migrating Adh alleles differing in enzyme activity. Heredity 38, 191–195.Google Scholar
van Delden, W., Kamping, A. & van Dijk, H. (1975). Selection at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia 31, 418–419.Google Scholar
van Delden, W., Boerema, A. C. & Kamping, A. (1978). The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Selection in different environments. Genetics 90, 161–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigue, C. L. & Johnson, F. M. (1973). Isozyme variability in species of the genus Drosophila. VI. Frequency-property-environment relationships of allelic alcohol dehydrogenase in D. melanogasler. Biochemical Genetics 9, 213–227.Google Scholar