Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:22:43.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

N. H. Barton  and
Michael Turelli
N. H. Barton
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Biometry, University College, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, U.K.
Michael Turelli
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The maintenance of polygenic variability by a balance between mutation and stabilizing selection has been analysed using two approximations: the ‘Gaussian’ and the ‘house of cards’. These lead to qualitatively different relationships between the equilibrium genetic variance and the parameters describing selection and mutation. Here we generalize these approximations to describe the dynamics of genetic means and variances under arbitrary patterns of selection and mutation. We incorporate genetic drift into the same mathematical framework.

The effects of frequency-independent selection and genetic drift can be determined from the gradient of log mean fitness and a covariance matrix that depends on genotype frequencies. These equations describe an ‘adaptive landscape’, with a natural metric of genetic distance set by the covariance matrix. From this representation we can change coordinates to derive equations describing the dynamics of an additive polygenic character in terms of the moments (means, variances, …) of allelic effects at individual loci. Only under certain simplifying conditions, such as those derived from the Gaussian and house-of-cards approximations, do these general recursions lead to tractable equations for the first few phenotypic moments. The alternative approximations differ in the constraints they impose on the distributions of allelic effects at individual loci. The Gaussian-based prediction that evolution of the phenotypic mean does not change the genetic variance is shown to be a consequence of the assumption that the allelic distributions are never skewed. We present both analytical and numerical results delimiting the parameter values consistent with our approximations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 157 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

Adler, R., Bazin, M. & Schiffer, M. (1975). Introduction to General Relativity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Akin, E. (1979). The Geometry of Population Genetics. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, 31. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonelli, P. L. & Strobeck, C. (1977). The geometry of random drift. I. Stochastic distance and diffusion. Advances in Applied Probability 9, 238–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, N. H. (1986). The maintenance of polygenic variability by a balance between mutation and stabilizing selection. Genetical Research 47, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, N. H. (1987). The effect of linkage and density-dependent regulation on gene flow. Heredity 57, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, N. H. & Rouhani, S. (1987). The frequency of shifts between alternative equilibria. Journal of Theoretical Biology (In the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, A. (1946). On a measure of divergence between two multinomial populations. Sankhya 7, 401–406.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. (1972). The genetic variability of polygenic characters under optimizing selection, mutation and drift. Genetical Research 19, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M. G. (1980). The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Edwards, A. W. F. (1967). Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21, 550–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakraborty, R. & Nei, M. (1982). Genetic differentiation of quantitative characters between populations or species. I. Mutation and random genetic drift. Genetical Research 39, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. (1964). The theory of genetic loads. Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Genetics 2, 495–505.Google Scholar
Ewens, W. J. (1964). The pseudo-transient distribution and its uses in genetics. Journal of Applied Probability 1, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewens, W. J. & Thomson, G. (1977). Properties of equilibria in multilocus genetic systems. Genetics 87, 807–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1981). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn.London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1979). Excursions along the interface between disruptive and stabilizing selection. Genetics 93, 773–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, J. N. (1968). Matrix Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gardiner, C. W. (1983). Handbook of Stochastic Methods. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J. H. (1984). Pleiotropic overdominance and the maintenance of genetic variation in polygenic traits. Genetics 107, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, R. (1977). Covariant formulation of non-equilibrium statistical thermodynamics. Zeitschrift für Physik B 26, 397–405.Google Scholar
Heuch, I. (1975). The relationship between separation time and genetic distance based on angular transformations of gene frequencies. Biometrics 31, 685–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. (1965). A stochastic model concerning the maintenance of genetic variability in quantitative characters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 54, 731–736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingman, J. F. C. (1978). A simple model for the balance between selection and mutation. Journal of Applied Probability 15, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M. (1982). Quantum evolution and punctuated equilibria in continuous genetic characters. American Naturalist 119, 833–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M. (1985). Evolution of female choice and male parental investment in polygynous species: the demise of the ‘sexy son’. American Naturalist 125, 788–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. (1975). The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genetical Research 26, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. (1976). Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30, 314–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1977). The influence of the mating system on the maintenance of genetic variability in polygenic characters. Genetics 86, 485–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 34, 402–416.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1980). The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 78, 3721–3725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1985). Expected time for random genetic drift of a population between stable phenotypic states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 82, 7641–7645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. & Arnold, S. J. (1983). The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210–1226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latter, B. D. H. (1960). Natural selection for an intermediate optimum. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 13, 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latter, B. D. H. (1970). Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles. II. Centripetal selection, mutation, and isoallelic variation. Genetics 66, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, M. & Hill, W. G. (1986). Phenotypic evolution by neutral mutation. Evolution 40, 915–935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, G. R. (1970). Selection and covariance. Nature 227, 520–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schluter, D. (1983). Morphological and phylogenetic relations among the Darwin's finches. Evolution 38, 921–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M. (1980). Ecological character displacement. Ecology 61, 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M. (1987). Heritable variation and heterozygosity under a balance between mutations and stabilizing selection (unpublished).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turelli, M. (1984). Heritable genetic variation via mutation–selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theoretical Population Biology 25, 138–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turelli, M. (1985). Effects of pleiotropy on predictions concerning mutation–selection balance for polygenic traits. Genetics 111, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turelli, M. (1986). Gaussian versus non-Gaussian genetic analyses of polygenic mutation–selection balance. In Evolutionary Processes and Theory (ed. Karlin, S. and Nevo, E.), pp. 607–628. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watterson, G. A. (1977). Heterosis or neutrality? Genetics 85, 753–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. (1935). Evolution in populations in approximate equilibrium. Journal of Genetics 30, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1941). On the probability of fixation of reciprocal translocations. American Naturalist 74, 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1949). Adaptation and selection. In Genetics, Paleontology, and Evolution (ed. Simpson, G. G., Jepson, G. L. and Mayr, E.), pp. 365–389. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1965) Factor interaction and linkage in evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 162, 80–104.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1969). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar