Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:34:13.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of rootstock, temperature and incubation duration onbacterial canker severity caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv.syringae in peach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2013

Tiesen Cao ,
Theodore M. Dejong ,
Kenneth A. Shackel ,
Bruce C. Kirkpatrick  and
R. Scott Johnson
Tiesen Cao*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Food Nutr. Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada. [email protected]
Theodore M. Dejong
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci. Pomol., Univ. Calif., Davis, CA 95616 USA
Kenneth A. Shackel
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci. Pomol., Univ. Calif., Davis, CA 95616 USA
Bruce C. Kirkpatrick
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Univ. Calif., Davis, CA 95616 USA
R. Scott Johnson
Affiliation:
Univ. Calif. Kearney Agric. Cent., Parlier, CA 93648 USA
*
* Correspondence and reprints
Get access

Abstract

Introduction. Bacterial canker, caused by Pseudomonassyringae pv. syringae, is a damaging disease of stone fruitworldwide. The effects of rootstock, temperature and incubation duration on bacterialcanker in peach were assessed using both field and laboratory inoculation assays.Materials and methods. Both field and laboratory experiments were conductedto study the effects of rootstock, temperature and incubation duration on disease severityin peach. All inoculations were achieved with P. syringae pv.syringae strain B3A. Bacterial inoculations were applied to 1-year-oldshoots of peach trees [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. After inoculation,the inoculated shoots were allowed to incubate either under field conditions or in a coldroom at different temperatures [constantly at 0 °C, constantly at 14.4 °C, and in afluctuating temperature regime of 12 h at 0 °C (night) and 12 h at 14.4 °C (day)] forexcised shoots. The lesions were determined 1 to 6 weeks after inoculation to determinethe effect of incubation duration. Results and discussion. The fieldexperiment using peach grafted on three rootstocks (Nemaguard, K119-50 and P30-135) showedthat shoots on Nemaguard developed the longest lesions and shoots on K119-50 the shortestamong all three rootstocks. Shoots on Nemaguard had significantly lower bark calcium andhigher nitrogen concentrations than those on K119-50 and P30-135. A negative correlationwas found between lesion length and bark calcium concentration and the [calcium/ nitrogen] ratio. Laboratory experiments with excised shoots on Nemaguard, K119-50,P30-135, Lovell and Guardian rootstocks growing in a second orchard showed inconsistentresults. Shoots from Nemaguard developed significantly smaller lesions than those onK119-50 and P30-135. Shoots on Guardian and Lovell also developed significantly smallerlesions than those of shoots on K119-50 and P30-135. Temperature fluctuation duringincubation (0 °C to 14.4 °C) had no effect on shoot lesion length compared with thoseincubated constantly at 14.4 °C, but produced significantly longer lesions than shootsincubated constantly at 0 °C. These inconsistent results suggest that, in the absence ofmajor predisposing factors (i.e., ring nematodes or low soil pH),rootstocks may play a minor role in peach susceptibility to bacterial canker even underfavorable disease development conditions.

Keywords

USAPrunus persicaplant diseasesPseudomonas syringaeexperimental infectionrootstockstemperatureÉtats-UnisPrunus persicamaladie des plantesPseudomonas syringaeinfection expérimentaleporte greffetempératureEUAPrunus persicaenfermedades de las plantasPseudomonas syringaeinfección experimentalportainjertostemperatura
Type
Original article
Information
Fruits , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 45 - 55
Copyright
© 2013 Cirad/EDP Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, H.R., Diseases of deciduous fruit trees incited by Pseudomonas syringae van Hall. A review of the literature with additional data, Or. Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 66 (1962) 1–64.Google Scholar
English, H., Davis, J.R., DeVay, J.E., Lownsbery, B.F., Bacterial canker, an important decline disease of apricots and other stone fruits in California, Acta Hortic. 85 (1980) 235–242.Google Scholar
Ogawa J.M., English H., Diseases of temperate zone tree fruit and nut crops, Univ. Calif., Div. Agric. & Nat. Resour., U.S.A., 1991.
Vigouroux, A., Berger, J.F., Bussi, C., La sensibilité du pêcher au dépérissement bactérien en France : incidence de certaines caractéristiques du sol et de l’irrigation. Relations avec la nutrition, Agronomie 7 (1987) 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigouroux, A., Bussi, C., Importance of water consumption on calcium content and protection of peaches predisposed to bacterial dieback by growing in acid soils, Acta Hortic. 254 (1989) 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigouroux, A., Bussi, C., Influence of water availability and soil calcium amendment on susceptibility of apricot to bacterial canker, Acta Hortic. 384 (1995) 607–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, H., DeVay, J.E., Lilleland, O., Davis, J.R., Effect of certain soil treatments on the development of bacterial canker in peach trees, (Abstr.) Phytopathology 51 (1961) 65.Google Scholar
Southwick, S.M., Yeager, J.T., Weis, K.G., Kirkpatrick, B.C., Little, E.L., Westerdah, B.B., Relationship between nitrogen fertilization and bacterial canker in ‘French’ prune, (Abstr.) HortSci. 32 (1997) 520.Google Scholar
Wilson E.E., Bacterial canker of stone fruits, Yearb. Agric., USDA, Wash. D.C., U.S.A., 1953, pp. 722–729.
Lembright, H.W., Solutions to problems associated with the replanting of peaches, Down Earth 32 (1976) 12–21.Google Scholar
Lownsbery, B.F., English, H., Noel, G.R., Schick, F.J., Influence of Nemaguard and Lovell rootstocks and Macroposthonia xenoplax on bacterial canker of peach, J. Nematol. 9 (1977) 221–224.Google ScholarPubMed
Nyczepir, A.P., Beckman, T.G., Reighard, G.L., Reproduction and development of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica on Guardian peach rootstock, J. Nematol. 31 (1999) 334–340.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.E., Bacterial canker of stone fruit trees in California, Hilgardia 8 (1933) 83–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dye, D.W., The effect of temperature on infection by Pseudomonas syringae van Hall, N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 38 (1957) 500–505.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.E., Factors affecting development of the bacterial canker of stone fruits, Hilgardia 12 (1939) 259–298.Google Scholar
Weaver, D.J., Interaction of Pseudomonas syringae and freezing in bacterial canker on excised peach twigs, Phytopathology 68 (1978) 1460–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otta, J.D., English, H., Epidemiology of the bacterial canker disease of ‘French’ prune, Plant Dis. Rep. 54 (1970) 332–336.Google Scholar
DeVay, J.E., Lukezic, F.L., Sinden, S.L., English, H., Coplin, D.L., A biocide produced by pathogenic isolates of Pseudomonas syringae and its possible role in the bacterial canker disease of peach trees, Phytopathology 58 (1968) 95–101.Google Scholar
King, E.O., Ward, M.K., Raney, D.E., Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin, J. Lab. Clin. Med. 44 (1954) 301–307.Google ScholarPubMed
Cao, T., Sayler, R.J., DeJong, T.M., Kirkpatrick, B.C., Bostock, R.M., Shackel, K.A., Influence of stem diameter, water content and freezing-thawing on bacterial canker development in excised stems of dormant stone fruit, Phytopathology 89 (1999) 962–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pella, E., Elemental organic analysis. Part 1. Historical developments, Am. Lab. 22 (3) (1990) 116–125.Google Scholar
Pella, E., Elemental organic analysis. Part 2. State of the art, Am. Lab. 22 (12) (1990) 28–32.Google Scholar
Cao, T., McKenry, M.V., Duncan, R.A., DeJong, T.M., Kirkpatrick, B.C., Shackel, K.A., Influence of ring nematode infestation and calcium, nitrogen, and indoleacetic acid applications on peach susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, Phytopathology 96 (2006) 608–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, T., Kirkpatrick, B.C., Shackel, K.A., DeJong, T.M., Influence of mineral nutrients and freezing-thawing on peach susceptibility to bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. Syringae, Fruits 66 (2011) 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, T., Duncan, R.A., McKenry, M.V., Shackel, K.A., DeJong, T.M., Kirkpatrick, B.C., The interaction between nitrogen fertilized peach trees and the expression of syrB, a gene involved in syringomycin production in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, Phytopathology 95 (2005) 581–586CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed