Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:09:41.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From the laboratory to the field: litter management for control of Botrytis cinerea in boysenberry gardens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2004

Monika Walter ,
Patricia Harris-Virgin ,
Nicholas William Waipara ,
Jill Stanley ,
Kirsty Sarah Helen Boyd-Wilson ,
Chris Morgan  and
Geoff Ian Langford
Monika Walter
Affiliation:
 HortResearch, PO Box 51, Lincoln, New Zealand
Patricia Harris-Virgin
Affiliation:
 HortResearch, PO Box 220, Motueka, New Zealand
Nicholas William Waipara
Affiliation:
 HortResearch, PO Box 51, Lincoln, New Zealand
Jill Stanley
Affiliation:
 HortResearch, PO Box 220, Motueka, New Zealand
Kirsty Sarah Helen Boyd-Wilson
Affiliation:
 HortResearch, PO Box 51, Lincoln, New Zealand
Chris Morgan
Affiliation:
 HortResearch, PO Box 220, Motueka, New Zealand
Geoff Ian Langford
Affiliation:
 HortResearch, PO Box 51, Lincoln, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

Introduction. Litter on the ground is a primary source of Botrytis cinerea inoculum in boysenberry (Rubus hybrid) gardens. The effect of litter management on primary inoculum production, and flower and berry infections was determined. Materials and methods. A series of experiments ranging from laboratory to large-scale field evaluations were conducted in New Zealand during 1997-2002 to evaluate litter management options for control of B. cinerea. The laboratory trial investigated the effect of litter size (shredded vs. unshredded litter) and debris amendments on tissue degradation and B. cinerea colonization. The field trial (four sites) investigated the effect of litter amendments (compost, urea and fungicide) and piling litter on B. cinerea sporulation. In the 4-year commercial-scale study (three properties), the effect of litter treatment (piling, compost and microbial extracts/suspensions) on primary inoculum, flower and berry infections was assessed. Results and discussion. The laboratory trial showed that bark + sewage sludge compost amendment enhanced litter decomposition and reduced B. cinerea sporulation on infected tissue after 8 weeks. The field trial indicated that piling of shredded boysenberry debris was more important than litter amendments in reducing the amount of B. cinerea harbored within the litter. Commercial field-scale evaluation of litter management options verified that piling of shredded litter is the most important step in B. cinerea inoculum control from debris. It also showed that microbial litter amendments (compost, solutions or extracts) can be beneficial. While B. cinerea inoculum control also reduced the amount of flower infections, berry infections at harvest were not affected, indicating that other sources of B. cinerea inoculum contribute to berry infection post-flowering.

Keywords

New ZealandRubusplant diseasesBotrytis cinereacontrol methodsmulchesmanagementinfectionflowersfruitsNouvelle-ZélandeRubusmaladie des plantesBotrytis cinereaméthode de luttemulchgestioninfectionfleurfruits
Type
Research Article
Information
Fruits , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , July 2004 , pp. 291 - 299
Copyright
© CIRAD, EDP Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Walter, M., Boyd-Wilson, K.S.H., Stanley, J., Harris-Virgin, P., Morgan, C., Pyke, N.B., Epidemiology of Botrytis cinerea in boysenberry (Rubus spp.), New Zeal. Plant Prot. 50 (1997) 93–100.
Walter, M., Boyd-Wilson, K.S.H., Perry, J.H., Role of style infection with Botrytis cinerea on hybrid berry rot (Rubus spp.), Acta Hortic. 505 (1999) 129–135. CrossRef
Hoitink, H.A.J., Fahy, P.C., Basis for the control of soilborne plant pathogens with compost, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 24 (1986) 93–114. CrossRef
Tränkner A., Kompost und Pflanzengesundheit: Möglichkeiten und Auswirkungen der biologischen Beeinflussung pflanzlicher Oberflächen zur Krankheitsbekämpfung, Verlag Dr Kovac, Hamburg, Germany, 1993, 123 p.
Himmelsbach, J., Wirkung und Wirtschaftlichkeit alternativer Bodenpflegeverfahren in Apfel-Intensivanlagen, Erwerbsobstbau 34 (2) (1992) 47–52.
Singh, S.P., Studies on mulching of vegetable crops – a review, Adv. Hortic. For. 2 (1992) 115–143.
Manna, M.C., Gosh, P.K., Gosh, B.N., Singh, K.N., Comparative effectiveness of phosphate-enriched compost and single superphosphate on yield, uptake of nutrients and soil quality under soybean-wheat rotation, J. Agric. Sci. 137 (2001) 45–54. CrossRef
Abbasi, P., Al-Dahmani, J., Sahin, F., Hoitink, H.A.J., Miller, S.A., Effect of compost amendments on disease severity and yield of tomato in conventional and organic production systems, Plant Dis. 86 (2) (2002) 156–161. CrossRef
Sauvage, D., The erosion control struggle thanks to mulches. Interests and limits, Phytoma 478 (1995) 43–46.
Mundy D., Agnew R., Effects of mulching with vineyard and winery waste on soil fungi and Botrytis bunch rot in Marlborough vineyards, New Zeal. Plant Prot. 55 (2002) 135–138.
Haug R.T., The practical handbook of compost engineering, Lewis Publishers, Lewis Publishers Inc., Boca Raton, USA, 1993.