Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:03:13.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European financial law and the state-finance nexus: Sovereign privileges or market discipline for safe public debt?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Ad van Riet
Ad van Riet*
Affiliation:
United Nations University, Belgium
*
Corresponding author: Ad van Riet, United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (UNU-CRIS), Potterierei 72, BE-8000 Bruges, Belgium. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

European financial regulation consistently gives governments privileged access to private investors, reflecting the anchor role assigned to sovereign securities as safe and liquid assets for the financial system. Legislative reforms after the financial crisis of 2008 further expanded the preferential treatment of sovereign securities as zero-risk claims, introduced portfolio requirements in favour of public debt, and constrained market speculation against governments. These sovereign privileges appear counterproductive for fiscal discipline and financial stability: they encourage excessive public debt issuance and make financial institutions holding government bonds - in particular from euro area countries with a variable risk profile - vulnerable to fiscal turbulence. Governments seem to have a conflict of interest. On the one hand, they are prudential regulators of financial risk-taking, on the other hand, they tend to overlook the financial sector's exposure to sovereign risk. This article considers four theories of the state-finance nexus and their solutions to this conflict of interest. The money view, the franchise view, and the modern financial repression view draw on the state's monetary and regulatory powers over finance to confirm sovereign safety. Their positions fundamentally contrast with the neoliberal view, which relies on free markets to enforce sustainable public finances. The article concludes that sovereign privileges present a fundamental dilemma for European financial governance with a neoliberal orientation: they oblige private investors to hold public debt, while weakening the role of markets in promoting fiscal discipline as the very foundation of sovereign safety.

Keywords

European lawfinancial governancestate-finance nexussovereign privilegesovereign safety
Type
Article
Information
Finance and Society , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , 2023 , pp. 39 - 57
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)

References

Basse, T. (2020) Solvency II and sovereign credit risk: Additional empirical evidence and some thoughts about implications for regulators and lawmakers. International Review of Law and Economics, 64: 105933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, D., Ryan-Collins, J., van Lerven, F. and Zhang, L. (2021) Credit policy and the ‘debt shift’ in advanced economies. Socio-Economic Review, https://10.1093/ser/mwab041.Google Scholar
Boy, N. (2015) Sovereign safety. Security Dialogue, 46(6): 530–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, B., Gabor, D. and Hübner, M. (2018) Governing through financial markets: Towards a critical political economy of Capital Markets Union. Competition & Change, 22(2): 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun B. (2020) Central banking and the infrastructural power of finance: The case of ECB support for repo and securitization markets. Socio-Economic Review, 18(2): 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruneau, Q. (2023) In the club: How and why central bankers created a hierarchy of sovereign borrowers, c. 1988-2007. Review of International Political Economy, 30(1): 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cœuré, B. (2016) Sovereign debt in the Euro area: Too safe or too risky? Keynote address at Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University, 3 November.Google Scholar
Culpepper, P.D. (2015) Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era. Business and Politics, 17(3): 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grauwe, P. and Ji, Y. (2022) The fragility of the Eurozone: Has it disappeared? Journal of International Money and Finance, 120: 102546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, J. and Amtenbrink, F. (2012) Taming the beast? New European regulation for credit rating agencies. Journal of Comparative and European Policy, 10(4): 433–58.Google Scholar
Eijffinger, S.C.W. (2012) Rating agencies: Role and influence of their sovereign credit risk assessment in the Eurozone. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(6): 912–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eijffinger, S.C.W. and Mujagic, E. (2012) The age of financial repression. Column on Project Syndicate, 21 November.Google Scholar
European Central Bank (ECB) (2020) Financial Stability Review, November. Frankfurt am Main: ECB.Google Scholar
European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (2021) Report on Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) on Liquidity Risk in Investment Funds. Paris: ESMA.Google Scholar
European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) (2015) Report on the Regulatory Treatment of Sovereign Exposures. Frankfurt am Main: ESRB.Google Scholar
European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) (2022) Recommendation of 2 December 2021 on Reform of Money Market Funds. ESRB/2021/9, 25 January.Google Scholar
Gabor, D. and Ban, C. (2016) Banking on bonds: The new links between states and markets. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(3): 617–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabor, D. and Vestergaard, J. (2018) Chasing unicorns: The European single safe asset project. Competition & Change, 22(2): 139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelpern, A. and Gerding, E.F. (2016) Inside safe assets. Yale Journal on Regulation, 33(2): 363–421.Google Scholar
Gill, S. (1995) Globalisation, market civilisation, and disciplinary neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24(3): 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, C.A.E. (1998) The two concepts of money: Implications for the analysis of optimal currency areas. European Journal of Political Economy, 14(3): 407–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, C.A.E. (2011) The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: A History of the Early Years 1974-1997. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gros, D. (2013) Banking union with a sovereign virus: The self-serving treatment of sovereign debt in the Euro area. Intereconomics, 48(2): 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, P. (2020) Critical analysis of the zero risk weight privilege for European sovereign debt in light of Art. 124 TFEU. The Economists’ Voice, 17(1): 22.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. (2001 [1944]) The Road to Serfdom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hemmelgarn, T., Gaëtan, N., Bogdan, T. and Vermote, P. (2016) Financial transaction taxes in the European Union. National Tax Journal, 69(1): 217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, R.C. and Omarova, S.T. (2017) The finance franchise. Cornell Law Review, 102(5): 11431218.Google Scholar
Hoogduin, L. and Wierts, P. (2012) Thoughts on policies and the policy framework after a financial crisis. BIS Paper, No 65: 83–90. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2012) Safe assets: Financial system cornerstone? In: Global Financial Stability Report: The Quest for Lasting Stability. Washington, D.C.: IMF, 81–122.Google Scholar
Kelber, A. and Monnet, E. (2014) Macroprudential policy and quantitative instruments: A European historical perspective. Financial Stability Review, 18: 151–60.Google Scholar
Kopf, C. (2011) Restoring financial stability in the Euro area. CEPS Policy Brief, No 237. Brussels: Centre for Economic Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Korte, J. and Steffen, S. (2015) Zero risk contagion: Banks’ sovereign exposure and sovereign risk spillovers. Working Paper, 7 April. Frankfurt am Main: Frankfurt and European School of Management and Technology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, T.D. (1993) Market discipline. IMF Staff Papers, 40(1): 53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, R.I. (1973) Money and Capital in Economic Development. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Mehrling, P. (2011) The New Lombard Street: How the Fed Became the Dealer of Last Resort. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrling, P. (2013) The inherent hierarchy of money. In: Taylor, L., Rezai, A. and Michl, T. (eds.) Social Fairness and Economics: Economic Essays in the Spirit of Duncan Foley. London: Routledge, 394404.Google Scholar
Monnet, E., Pagliari, S. and Vallée, S. (2019) Beyond financial repression and regulatory capture. The recomposition of European financial ecosystems after the crisis. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 229(4): 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, L. (2000) Room to move: International financial markets and national welfare states. International Organization, 54(4): 737–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mügge, D. (2013) Resilient neo-liberalism in European financial regulation. In: Schmidt, V. and Thatcher, M. (eds.) Resilient Liberalism in Europe's Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201–25.Google Scholar
Nouy, D. (2012) Is sovereign risk properly addressed by financial regulation? Financial Stability Review, 16: 95–106.Google Scholar
Ojala, M. (2021) Doing away with the sovereign: Neoliberalism and the promotion of market discipline in European economic governance. New Political Economy, 26(1): 203–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliari, S. (2015) Financial industry power and regulatory policies: What lessons from the global financial crisis? Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 10(2): 209–32.Google Scholar
Preunkert, J. (2017) Financialization of government debt? European government debt management approaches 1980-2007. Competition & Change, 21(1): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, C.M., Kirkegaard, J.F. and Sbrancia, M.B. (2011) Financial repression redux. Finance & Development, 48(1): 22–26.Google Scholar
Reinhart, C.M. and Rogoff, K.S. (2011) A decade of debt. Policy Analyses in International Economics, No 95. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Rommerskirchen, C. (2015) Debt and punishment: Market discipline in the Eurozone. New Political Economy, 20(5): 752–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, V. (2020) In conversation: Credit rating agencies back in the spotlight? Speech given at the ECMI 10th Annual Conference, 6 November.Google Scholar
Shaw, E.S. (1973) Financial Deepening and Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sissoko, C. (2019) Repurchase agreements and the (de)construction of financial markets. Economy and Society, 48(3): 315–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Riet A. (2017) Addressing the safety trilemma: A safe sovereign asset for the eurozone. ESRB Working Paper, No 35. Frankfurt am Main: European Systemic Risk Board.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Riet, A. (2018) Modern financial repression in the euro area crisis: Making high public debt sustainable? SUERF Policy Note, No 34. Vienna: SUERF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Riet, A. (2019) The preferential treatment of government debt in financial law: The case of Europe. In: Avgouleas, E. and Donald, D.C. (eds.) The Political Economy of Financial Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 385–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Riet, A. (2021) Safe and risky sovereigns in the Euro area capital market: Financial drivers of fiscal policies in Germany and Italy. German Politics, 30(3): 441–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolswijk, G. (2020) Drivers of European public debt management. ECB Working Paper, No 2437. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar