Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:22:46.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contemporary art and financialization: Two approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Victoria Ivanova
Victoria Ivanova*
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London, UK
*
Corresponding author: Victoria Ivanova, 134C Drakefell Road, London SE14 5SQ, UK. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This essay identifies two approaches to theorizing the relationship between financialization and contemporary art. The first departs from an analysis of how market logics in non-financial spheres are being transformed to facilitate financial circulation; the other considers valuation practices in financial markets (and those related to derivative instruments in particular) from a socio-cultural perspective. According to the first approach, the contemporary art market is in theory a hostile environment for financialization, although new practices are emerging that are increasing its integration with the financial sphere. The second approach identifies socio-cultural similarities between the logics by which value is extracted, amplified, and distributed through derivative instruments and contemporary art. The two approaches present a discrepancy: on the one hand, contemporary art functions as an impediment to outright financialization because of market opacity; on the other, contemporary art represents a socio-cultural analog to derivative instruments. The essay concludes by setting out the terms for a more holistic understanding of contemporary art's relationship to financialization, which would enable an integration of its economic and socio-cultural dimensions.

Keywords

Art marketcontemporary artderivativesfinancializationopacity
Type
Essay
Information
Finance and Society , Volume 2 , Issue 2: Art and finance , 2016 , pp. 127 - 137
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2016 The Author(s)

References

Alberro, A. (2003) Conceptual Art and the Politics of Publicity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1992) Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(4): 571–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Art Market Monitor of Artron (2016) The Art Market in 2015. Available at: <http://imgpublic.artprice.com/pdf/rama2016_en.pdf/>. Accessed 20 October 2016..+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
ArtRank (Website) (2016) Available at: <http://artrank.com/>. Accessed 20 October 2016..+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Artsy (Website) (2016) Available at: <https://www.artsy.net/>. Accessed 20 October 2016..+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Blackman, A. (2015) Art plays growing role as collateral. The Wall Street Journal, 14 June. Available at: <http://www.wsj.com/articles/art-plays-a-growing-role-as-collateral-1434054783/>. Accessed 20 October 2016..+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Braudel, F. (1985) The Structures of Everyday Life: Volume I. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Christie's Auctions and Private Sales (Website) (2016) Available at: <http://www.christies.com/>. Accessed 20 October 2016.. Accessed 20 October 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Christie's+Auctions+and+Private+Sales+(Website)+(2016)+Available+at:+.+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Danto, A. (1964) The artworld. The Journal of Philosophy, 61(19): 571–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deloitte and ArtTactic (2011) Art and Finance Report. Available at: <https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Finance/gx-finance-art-and-finance-report-110112.pdf/>. Accessed 20 October 2016..+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Deloitte and ArtTactic (2013) Art and Finance Report. Available at: <http://www.deloittelux-library.com/artandfinance/2013/lu_en_wp_artandfinancereport_15032013.pdf/>. Accessed 20 October 2016..+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Deloitte and ArtTactic (2014) Art and Finance Report. Available at: <http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/at/Documents/Tax/art-finance-report.pdf/>. Accessed 20 October 2016..+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Deloitte and ArtTactic (2016) Art and Finance Report. Available at: <http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/lu/Documents/financial-services/artandfinance/lu-en-artandfinancereport-21042016.pdf/>. Accessed 20 October 2016..+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Deutschmann, C. (2011) Limits to financialization. European Journal of Sociology, 52(3): 347–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Landa, M. (2016) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Epstein, G. (2005) Introduction: Financialization and the world economy. In: Epstein, G. (ed) Financialization and the World Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 3–16.Google Scholar
Esposito, E. (2011) The Future of Futures: The Time of Money in Financing and Society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frieze (Website) (2016) Available at: <https://frieze.com/fairs?q=fairs&language=en/>. Accessed 20 October 2016..+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Gerald Nestler (Website) (2016) Available at: <http://www.geraldnestler.net/>. Accessed 2 October 2016..+Accessed+2+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Graw, I. (2012) In the grip of the market? On the relative heteronomy of art, the art world, and art criticism. In: Lind, M. and Velthuis, O. (eds.) Art and Its Commercial Markets: A Report on Current Changes and with Scenarios for the Future. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 183–207.Google Scholar
Helmore, E. (2014) Buy! Sell! Liquidate! How ArtRank is shaking up the art market. The Guardian, 23 June. Available at: <https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2014/jun/23/artrank-buy-sell-liquidate-art-market-website-artists-commodities/>. Accessed 20 October 2016..+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Ivanova, V. (2015) Art's values: A détente, a grand plié. Parse, 2: 91–105.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, K. and Preda, A. (2012) Introduction. In: Knorr Cetina, K. and Preda, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazakina, K. (2015) Sotheby's boosts art-loan financing with $1 billion line. Bloomberg, 23 June. Available at: <http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-23/sotheby-s-boosts-art-loan-financing-with-1-billion-line/>. Accessed: 20 October 2016.. Accessed: 20 October 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Kazakina,+K.+(2015)+Sotheby's+boosts+art-loan+financing+with+$1+billion+line.+Bloomberg,+23+June.+Available+at:+.+Accessed:+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Kotz, D.M. (2010) Financialization and neoliberalism. In: Teeple, G. and McBride, S. (eds.) Relations of Global Power: Neoliberal Order and Disorder. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Kotz, D.M. (2015) The Rise and Fall of Neoliberal Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krippner, G.R. (2005) The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2): 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapavitsas, C. (2011) Theorizing financialization. Work, Employment and Society, 25(4): 611–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazzarato, M. (1996) Immaterial labour. In: Virno, P. and Hardt, M. (eds.) Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 132–47.Google Scholar
Lee, B. and LiPuma, (2002) Cultures of circulation: The imaginations of modernity. Public Culture, 14(1): 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B., and Martin, R. (2016) Introduction. In: Lee, B. and Martin, R. (eds.) Derivatives and the Wealth of Societies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, M. (2012) Preface: Contemporary art and its commercial markets. In: Lind, M. and Velthuis, O. (eds.) Art and Its Commercial Markets: A Report on Current Changes and with Scenarios for the Future. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 7–14.Google Scholar
LiPuma, E. and Lee, B. (2005) Financial derivatives and the rise of circulation. Economy and Society, 34(3): 404–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, S. (2008) Critique as alibi: Moral differentiation in the art market. Journal of Visual Arts Practice, 7(3): 283–95.Google Scholar
Malik, S. (2013) Civic virtue in neoliberalism and contemporary art's cartelisation. In: Erdemici, F. (ed.) Mom, Am I Barbarian? 13th Istanbul Biennial Book. Istanbul: IKSV, 630–52.Google Scholar
Malik, S. and Phillips, A. (2012) Tainted love: Art's ethos and capitalization. In: Lind, M. and Velthuis, O. (eds.) Art and Its Commercial Markets: A Report on Current Changes and with Scenarios for the Future. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 209–40.Google Scholar
Nestler, G. (forthcoming) The Derivative Condition. PhD thesis submitted to Goldsmiths College in October 2016.Google Scholar
Osborne, P. (2013) Anywhere or Not at All: The Philosophy of Contemporary Art. London: Verso. Paddle8 (Website) (2016) Available at: <https://paddle8.com>. Accessed 20 October 2016. Phillips (Website) (2016) Available at: <https://www.phillips.com/>. Accessed 20 October 2016.Google Scholar
Reed, P. (2016) For a non-trivial art. In: Bohal, V., Breitling, D. and Janoscik, V. (eds.) Reinventing Horizons. Prague: Display Press, 165–79.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (2008) The Intangibilities of Form: Skilling and Deskilling in Art After the Readymade. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Rorimer, A. (2004) New Art in the 60s and 70s: Redefining Reality. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Seed, J. (2015) Can't sell your art? Try jacking up your prices. The Huffington Post, 4 June. Available at: <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-seed/cant-sell-your-art-try-ja_b_7512444.html/>. Accessed 20 October 2016.. Accessed 20 October 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Seed,+J.+(2015)+Can't+sell+your+art?+Try+jacking+up+your+prices.+The+Huffington+Post,+4+June.+Available+at:+.+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Sotheby's (Website) (2016) Available at: <http://www.sothebys.com/>. Accessed 20 October 2016.. Accessed 20 October 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sotheby's+(Website)+(2016)+Available+at:+.+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Sotheby's Financial Services (Website) (2016) Available at: <http://www.sothebys.com/financial/index.html/>. Accessed 20 October 2016.. Accessed 20 October 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sotheby's+Financial+Services+(Website)+(2016)+Available+at:+.+Accessed+20+October+2016.>Google Scholar
Steyerl, H. (2016) If you don't have bread, eat art: Contemporary art and derivative fascisms. e-flux, 76. Available at: <http://www.e-flux.com/journal/76/69732/if-you-don-t-have-bread-eat-art-contemporary-art-and-derivative-fascisms/>. Accessed 20 October 2016.Google Scholar
Toscano, A. and Kinkle, J. (2015) Cartographies of the Absolute. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Velthuis, O. (2007) Talking Prices: Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Velthuis, O. (2014) ArtRank and the flippers: Apocalypse now? Texte Zur Kunst, 96: 35–49.Google Scholar
Velthuis, O. and Coslor, E. (2012) The financialization of art. In: Knorr Cetina, K. and Preda, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 471–90.Google Scholar