Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nwwvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-17T13:34:52.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An experimental study of the impact of competition for Other People’s Money: the portfolio manager market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Marina Agranov ,
Alberto Bisin  and
Andrew Schotter
Marina Agranov*
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Alberto Bisin
Affiliation:
New York University, 19W 4th Street, New York, NY 10012, USA
Andrew Schotter
Affiliation:
New York University, 19W 4th Street, New York, NY 10012, USA
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we experimentally investigate the impact that competing for funds has on the risk-taking behavior of laboratory portfolio managers compensated through an option-like scheme according to which the manager receives (most of) the compensation only for returns in excess of pre-specified strike price. We find that such a competitive environment and contractual arrangement lead, both in theory and in the lab, to inefficient risk taking behavior on the part of portfolio managers. We then study various policy interventions, obtained by manipulating various aspects of the competitive environment and the contractual arrangement, e.g., the Transparency of the contracts offered, the Risk Sharing component in the contract linking portfolio managers to investors, etc. While all these interventions would induce portfolio managers, at equilibrium, to efficiently invest funds in safe assets, we find that, in the lab, Transparency is most effective in incentivising managers to do so. Finally, we document a behavioral “Other People’s Money” effect in the lab, where portfolio managers tend to invest the funds of their investors in a more risky manner than their Own Money, even when it is not in either the investors’ or the managers’ interest to do so.

Keywords

ContractsExperimentsCompetition for funds

JEL classification

D86: Economics of Contract: Theory
Type
Original Paper
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 564 - 585
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-013-9384-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

Amin, G. S., & Kat, H. M. (2002). Welcome to the dark side: hedge fund attrition and survivorship bias over the period 1994–2001. ISMA Centre Discussion Papers In Finance 2002–02.Google Scholar
Asparouhova, E., Bossaerts, P., Copic, J., & Cornell, B. (2011). Competition in portfolio management: theory and experiment. Mimeo, Caltech.Google Scholar
Brennan, G., Gonzales, L., Guth, W., & Levati, V. M. (2008). Attitudes toward private and collective risk in individual and strategic choice situations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67, 253–262. 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J., Goetzmann, W. N., & Park, J. (2001). Careers and survival: competition and risk in the hedge fund and CTA industry. The Journal of Finance, 56(5), 1869–1886. 10.1111/0022-1082.00392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, J. (2000). Does option compensation increase managerial risk appetite?. The Journal of Finance, 55(5), 2311–2331. 10.1111/0022-1082.00288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarty, S., Harrison, G. W., Haruvy, E. E., & Rutstrom, E. E. (2011). Are you risk averse over other people’s money?. Southern Economic Journal, 77(4), 901–913. 10.4284/0038-4038-77.4.901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, F. R., & Caglayan, M. O. (2001). Hedge fund performance and manager skill. Mimeo, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Ellison, G., & Chevalier, J. (1999). Carrer concerns of mutual fund managers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 389–432. 10.1162/003355399556034Google Scholar
Eriksen, K. W., & Kvaloy, O. (2010). Myopic investment management. Review of Finance, 14, 521–542. 10.1093/rof/rfp019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, W., & Hsieh, D. A. (1999). A primer on hedge funds. Journal of Empirical Finance, 6, 309–331. 10.1016/S0927-5398(99)00006-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetzmann, W. N., Ingersoll, J. Jr., & Ross, S. A. (2003). High water marks and hedge fund management contracts. The Journal of Finance, 58(4), 1685–1717. 10.1111/1540-6261.00581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Z., & Xiong, W. (2010). Delegated asset management and investment mandates. Mimeo, University of Chicago Booth School of Business.Google Scholar
Inechen, A., & Silberstein, K. (2008). Aima’s roadmap to hedge funds. The Alternative Investment Management Association Limited.Google Scholar
Jackwerth, J. C., & Hodder, J. E. (2006). Incentive contracts and hedge fund management. MPRA Paper No. 11632.Google Scholar
Keasey, K., & Moon, P. (1996). Gambling with the house money in capital expenditure decisions: an experimental study. Economic Letters, 50(1), 105–110. 10.1016/0165-1765(95)00726-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, S. D., & Syverson, C. (2008). Market distortions when agents are better informed: the value of information in real estate transactions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 599–611. 10.1162/rest.90.4.599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, B. (2000). Hedge funds: the living and the dead. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(3), 309–326. 10.2307/2676206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, B. G., & Saha, A. (2005). Hedge funds: risk and return. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(6), 80–88. 10.2469/faj.v61.n6.2775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matutes, C., & Vives, X. (2000). Imperfect competition, risk taking, and regulation in banking. European Economic Review, 44, 1–34. 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00057-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlo, A., & Schotter, A. (1999). A surprise-quiz view of learning in economic experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 28(1), 25–54. 10.1006/game.1998.0681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ou-Yang, H. (2003). Optimal contracts in a continuous time delegated portfolio management problem. The Review of Financial Studies, 16(1), 173–208. 10.1093/rfs/16.1.173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palomino, F., & Prat, A. (2003). Risk taking and optimal contracts for money managers. The Rand Journal of Economics, 34(1), 113–137. 10.2307/3087446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panageas, S., & Westerfield, M. M. (2009). High-water marks: high risk appetites? Convex compensation, long horizons, and portfolio choice. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 1–36. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01427.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuben, E., & Suetens, S. (2009). Revisiting strategic versus non-strategic cooperation. CentER discussion paper 2009–22.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214. 10.1287/mksc.4.3.199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183–206. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199909)12:3<183::AID-BDM318>3.0.CO;2-F3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choices. Management Science, 36(6), 643–660. 10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Agranov et al. supplementary material

Appendix
Download Agranov et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Agranov et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix
Download Agranov et al. supplementary material(File)
File 80.4 KB