Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:13:33.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WATER RELATIONS AND IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS OF ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.): A REVIEW OF YIELD AND QUALITY IMPACTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

M. PÉREZ ORTOLÁ  and
J. W. KNOX
M. PÉREZ ORTOLÁ
Affiliation:
Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK
J. W. KNOX*
Affiliation:
Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK
*
†Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The results of international research on the water relations and irrigation needs of onions have been synthesised in an attempt to link fundamental studies on crop physiology to irrigation practices, and consequent impacts on crop yield, quality and storage. Following a brief introduction on its origins and centres of production, a synthesis of research on crop development including plant water relations, crop water requirements, yield response to water, irrigation systems and scheduling are presented. Most of the evidence stems from research conducted in arid and semi-arid regions, notably the USA, India, Spain and Turkey. The findings confirm that onion seasonal water requirements are highly variable depending on agroclimate, location and season, as are the crop coefficients (Kc) which range from 0.4 to 0.7 (initial stage), 0.85 to 1.05 (middle development) and 0.6 to 0.75 (final stage). Seasonal irrigation needs are reported to vary from 225 to 1040 mm to produce between 10 and 77 t ha−1. The most sensitive stages for water stress are at emergence, transplanting and bulb formation. Final crop quality can also be affected by water excess. Water stress at specific stages can negatively impact on quality leading to reduced size and multi-centred bulbs. In recent years, pressure on water resources, retailer demands for quality assurance and rising production costs have meant that onion irrigation has switched from traditional low efficiency (furrow) methods to more efficient advanced (sprinkler and drip) technologies. For scheduling, optimal soil water potential thresholds for triggering irrigation were found to be between −17 and −27 kPa for drip and furrow irrigation. Research is underway to maximise water use efficiency in onions, but the deficit irrigation regimes being tested under experimental conditions have yet to be adopted commercially.

Type
Review Paper
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 210 - 231
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrameto, M. A., Pozzo Ardizzi, C. M., Gil, M. I. and Molina, L. M. (2010). Analysis of methodologies for the study of composition and biochemical carbohydrate changes in harvest and postharvest onion bulbs [Análisis de metodologías para el estudio de la composición y cambios bioquímicos de carbohidratos en bulbos de cebolla a la cosecha y postcosecha]. Pgyron 79:123–132.Google Scholar
Al-Jamal, M. S., Ball, S. and Sammis, T. W. (2001). Comparison of sprinkler, trickle and furrow irrigation efficiencies for onion production. Agricultural Water Management 46 (3):253–266.Google Scholar
Al-Jamal, M. S., Sammis, T. W., Bali, S. and Smeal, D. (1999). Yield-based, irrigated onion crop coefficients. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 15 (6):659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Jamal, M. S., Sammis, T. W., Ball, S. and Smeal, D. (2000). Computing the crop water production function for onion. Agricultural Water Management 46 (1):29–41.Google Scholar
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements (Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. F. O., De Juan Valero, J. A., Tarjuelo Martín-Benito, J. M. and López Mata, E. (2004). MOPECO: an economic optimization model for irrigation water management. Irrigation Science 23 (2):61–75.Google Scholar
Amodeo, G., Talbott, L. D. and Zeiger, E. (1996). Use of potassium and sucrose by onion guard cells during a daily cycle of osmoregulation. Plant and Cell Physiology 37 (5):575–579.Google Scholar
Ayas, S. and Demirtas, C. (2009). Deficit irrigation effects on onion (Allium cepa L. ET Grano 502) yield in unheated greenhouse condition. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 7:239–243.Google Scholar
Bailey, P. H. J., Currey, J. D. and Fitter, A. H. (2002). The role of root system architecture and root hairs in promoting anchorage against uprooting forces in Allium cepa and root mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany 53 (367):333–340.Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, P. K., Mallick, S. and Rana, S. K. (2003). Actual evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of onion (Allium cepa L.) under varying soil moisture levels in the humid tropics of India. Tropical Agriculture 80:83–90.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. K., Khair, A., Sarker, P. K. and Alom, M. S. (2010). Yield and storability of onion (Allium cepa L.) as affected by varying levels of irrigation. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 35:247–255.Google Scholar
Bossie, M., Tilahum, K. and Hordofa, T. (2009). Crop coefficient and evapotranspiration of onion at Awash Melkassa, Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 23:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyhan, G., Purvis, A. C., Hurst, W. C., Torrance, R. L. and Paulk, J. T. (2004). Harvest date effect on yield and controlled-atmosphere storability of short-day onions. Hortscience 39 (7):1623–1629.Google Scholar
Brewster, J. L. (1979). The response of growth rate to temperature in seedlings of several Allium crop species. Annals of Applied Biology 93 (3):351–357.Google Scholar
Brewster, J. L. (1990). The influence of cultural and environmental factors on the time of maturity of bulb onion crops. Acta Horticulturae 267:289–296.Google Scholar
Brewster, J. L. (2008). Onions and Other Vegetable Alliums, 2nd edn.King's Lynn, UK: Biddles Ltd.Google Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. and Knox, J. W. (2011). The water relations and irrigation requirements of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum): a review. Experimental Agriculture 47 (1):1–25.Google Scholar
Chope, G. A., Terry, L. A. and White, P. J. (2006). Effect of controlled atmosphere storage on abscisic acid concentration and other biochemical attributes of onion bulbs. Postharvest Biology and Technology 39 (3):233–242.Google Scholar
Chope, G. A., Terry, L. A. and White, P. J. (2007). Preharvest application of exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) or an ABA analogue does not affect endogenous ABA concentration of onion bulbs. Plant Growth Regulation 52:117–129.Google Scholar
Córcoles, J., Ortega, J. F., Hernandez, D. and Moreno, M. A. (2013). Use of digital photography from unmanned aerial vehicles for estimation of leaf area index in onion (Allium cepa L.). European Journal of Agronomy 45:96–104.Google Scholar
De Mason, D. A. (1990). Botany Physiology and Genetics. In Onions and Allied Crops, Vol. I, 27–51 (Eds Rabinowitch, H. D. and Brewster, J. L.). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
De Visser, C. L. M. (1994). ALCEPAS, an onion growth-model based on SUCROS87. 1. Development of the model. Journal of Horticultural Science 69:501–518.Google Scholar
Diaz-Perez, J. C., Gitaitis, R., Bertrand, D., Giddings, D., Randle, W., Harrison, K. and Torrence, R. (2002). Influence of mulches and drip irrigation on the growth, yield and quality of vidalia onion. Hortscience 37:748.Google Scholar
Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A. H. (1979). Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, W.O. and Janes, B. E. (1955). Effects of irrigation and soil water on maturity, yield, and storage of two onion hybrids. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 66:267–279.Google Scholar
Drost, D., Grossl, P. and Koenig, R. (1997). Nutrient management of onions: A Utah perspective. Proceedings of International Conference on Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, The International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage, 2:54–59.Google Scholar
El Balla, M. M. A. d., Hamid, A. A. and Abdelmagee, A. H. A. (2013). Effects of time of water stress on flowering, seed yield and seed quality of common onion (Allium cepa L.) under the arid tropical conditions of Sudan. Agricultural Water Management 121:149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ells, J. E., McSay, A. E., Soltanpour, P. N., Schweissing, F. C., Bartolo, M. E. and Kruse, E. G. (1993). Onion irrigation and nitrogen leaching in the Arkansas Valley of Colorado 1990–1991. HortTechnology 3:184–187.Google Scholar
Enciso, J., Wiedenfeld, B., Jifon, J. and Nelson, S. (2009). Onion yield and quality response to two irrigation scheduling strategies. Scientia Horticulturae 120 (3):301–305.Google Scholar
English, M. (1990). Deficit irrigation. I: Analytical framework. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 116 (3):399–412.Google Scholar
English, M. and Raja, S. N. (1996). Perspectives on deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 32 (1):1–14.Google Scholar
FAO, (2012). FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org.Google Scholar
Finch-Savage, W. E. and Phelps, K. (1993). Onion (Allium cepa L.) seedling emergence patterns can be explained by the influence of soil temperature and water potential on seed germination. Journal of Experimental Botany 44 (259):407–414.Google Scholar
Friesen, N., Fritsch, R. M. and Blattner, F. R. (2006). Phylogeny and new intrageneric classification of Allium (Alliaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA its sequences. Aliso 22:372–395.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. J., Gerwitz, A., Stone, D. A. and Barnes, A. (1982). Root development of vegetable crops. Plant and Soil 68:75–96.Google Scholar
Grzegorzewska, M. (1999). Dormancy of onion as influenced by weather conditions during the growth season and maturity degree at harvest. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin 50:71–79.Google Scholar
Halvorson, A. D., et al. (2008). Nitrogen effects on onion yield under drip and furrow irrigation. Agronomy Journal 100 (4):1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanelt, P. (1990). Taxonomy, evolution and history. In Onions and Allied Crops, 1–26 (Eds Brewster, J. L. and Rabinowitch, H. D.). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, B. R., Orloff, S. and Peters, D. (2000). Monitoring soil moisture helps refine irrigation management. California Agriculture 54 (3):38–42.Google Scholar
Heath, O. V. S. (1951). Studies in stomatal behaviour II. The role of starch in the light response of Allium cepa L., together with some preliminary observations on the temperature response. New Phytologist 51 (1):30–47.Google Scholar
Hess, T. M. and Knox, J. W. (2013). Water savings in irrigated agriculture – a framework for assessing technology and management options to reduce water losses. Outlook on Agriculture 42 (2):85–91.Google Scholar
Jiménez, M., De Juan, J., Tarjuelo, J. M. and Ortega, J. F. (2010). Effect of irrigation uniformity on evapotranspiration and onion yield. The Journal of Agricultural Science 148 (2):139.Google Scholar
Kadayifci, A., Tuylu, G. I., Ucar, Y. and Cakmak, B. (2005). Crop water use of onion (Allium cepa L.) in Turkey. Agricultural Water Management 72 (1):59–68.Google Scholar
Kahlon, M. S., Singh, C. B. and Sekhon, N. K. (2011). Response of onion to irrigation and potassium application. Research on Crops 12:539–544.Google Scholar
Knox, J. W., Rodriguez-Diaz, J. A., Weatherhead, E. K. and Kay, M. G. (2010). Development of a water strategy for horticulture in England and Wales. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 85 (2):89–93.Google Scholar
Ko, S. S., Chang, W. N., Wang, J. F., Cherng, S. J. and Shanmugasundaram, S. (2002). Variability among short-day onion cultivars under high temperature and high relative humidity, and its relationship with disease incidence and bulb characteristics. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 127 (5):848–854.Google Scholar
Kruse, E. G., Ells, J. E. and McSay, A. E. (1987). Comparison of 2 onion irrigation scheduling programs. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 112:738–742.Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Imtiyaz, M. and Kumar, A. (2007b). Effect of differential soil moisture and nutrient regimes on postharvest attributes of onion (Allium cepa L.). Scientia Horticulturae 112 (2):121–129.Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Imtiyaz, M., Kumar, A. and Singh, R. (2007a). Response of onion (Allium cepa L.) to different levels of irrigation water. Agricultural Water Management 89 (1–2):161–166.Google Scholar
Lacey, T. and Ober, E. (2011). Impact of irrigation practices on Rijnsburger bulb onion husbandry, quality and storability – II FV 362a. Annual Report, Year 1. Stoneleigh, UK: Horticulture Development Council, AHDB.Google Scholar
Lacey, T. and Ober, E. (2013). Impact of irrigation practices on Rijnsburger bulb onion husbandry, quality and storability – II FV 362a. Annual Report, Year 3. Stoneleigh, UK: Horticulture Development Council, AHDB.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J. E., Triggs, C. M., De Ruiter, J. M. and Gandar, P. W. (1996). Bulbing in onions: photoperiod and temperature requirements and prediction of bulb size and maturity. Annals of Botany 78:423–430.Google Scholar
Lanzotti, V. (2006). The analysis of onion and garlic. Journal of Chromatography A 1112:3–22.Google Scholar
Lercari, B. and Deitzer, G. (1987). Time-dependent effectiveness of far-red light on the photoperiodic induction of bulb formation in Allium cepa L. Photochemistry and Photobiology 45 (s1):831–835.Google Scholar
Lopez-Urrea, R., Olalla, F. M. D., Montoro, A. and Lopez-Fuster, P. (2009). Single and dual crop coefficients and water requirements for onion (Allium cepa L.) under semiarid conditions. Agricultural Water Management 96:1031–1036.Google Scholar
Martín de Santa Olalla, F., Domínguez-Padilla, A. and López, R. (2004). Production and quality of the onion crop (Allium cepa L.) cultivated under controlled deficit irrigation conditions in a semi-arid climate. Agricultural Water Management 68 (1):77–89.Google Scholar
Meranzova, R. and Babrikov, T. (2002). Evapotranspiration of longday onion, irrigated by microsprinklers. Journal of Central European Agriculture 3:189–194.Google Scholar
Millar, A. A., Gardner, W. R. and Goltz, S. M. (1971). Internal water status and water transport in seed onion plants. Agronomy Journal 63 (5):779–784.Google Scholar
Mohammadi, J., Lamei, J., Khasmakhi-Sabet, A., Olfati, J. A. and Peyvast, G. H. (2010). Effect of irrigation methods and transplant size on onion cultivars yield and quality. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment 8:158–160.Google Scholar
Monaghan, J. M., Daccache, A., Vickers, L. H., Hess, T. M., Weatherhead, E. K., Grove, I. G., and Knox, J. W. (2013). More ‘crop per drop’ – constraints and opportunities for precision irrigation in European agriculture. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93 (5):977–980.Google Scholar
Mondal, M. F. (1985). Studies on the control of bulbing in onion (Allium cepa L.). PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
Mondal, M. F., et al. (1986). Bulb development in onion (Allium-Cepa L.). 2. The influence of red far-red spectral ratio and of photon flux-density. Annals of Botany 58 (2):197–206.Google Scholar
OECD (2012). International Standards for Fruit and Vegetables: Onions. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/international-standards-for-fruit-and-vegetables_19935668Google Scholar
Parkin, J., 1899. Contribution to our knowledge of the formation, storage, and depletion of carbohydrates in monocotyledons. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 191:35–79.Google Scholar
Pejic, B., Gvozdanovi, J., Mili, S., Ignjatovi, A. and Krsti, D. (2011). Effect of irrigation schedules on yield and water use of onion (Allium cepa L.). African Journal of Biotechnology 10 (14):2644–2652.Google Scholar
Pelter, G. Q., Mittelstadt, R., Leib, B. G. and Redulla, C. A. (2004). Effects of water stress at specific growth stages on onion bulb yield and quality. Agricultural Water Management 68:107–115.Google Scholar
Pereira, L. S. and Allen, R. G. (1999). Land and Water Engineering. In CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering, Vol. 1, 213–262 (Eds van Lier, H. N., Pereira, L. S. and Steiner, F. R.). St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.Google Scholar
Perez Ortola, M. (2014). Modelling the impacts of in-field soil and irrigation variability on onion yield. MPhil Thesis (unpublished), Cranfield University, Bedford.Google Scholar
Perez Ortola, M., Daccache, A., Hess, T. M. and Knox, J. W. (2014). Simulating the impacts of irrigation heterogeneity on onion (Allium cepa L.) yield in a humid climate. Irrigation Science (accepted).Google Scholar
Piccinni, G., Ko, J., Marek, T. and Leskovar, D. (2009). Crop coefficients specific to multiple phenological stages for evapotranspiration-based irrigation management of onion and spinach. HortScience 44:421–425.Google Scholar
Rattin, J. E., Assuero, S., Sasso, G., Gastón, O. and Tognetti, J. (2011). Accelerated storage losses in onion subjected to water deficit during bulb filling. Scientia Horticulturae 130 (1):25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renault, D. and Wallender, W. W. (2000). Nutritional water productivity and diets. Agricultural Water Management 45:275–296.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Díaz, J. A., Urrestarazu, L. Pérez, Poyato, E. Camacho and Montesinos, P. (2012). Modernizing water distribution networks: Lessons from the Bembézar MD irrigation district, Spain. Outlook on Agriculture 41 (4):229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Galdón, B., Tascón Rodríguez, C., Rodríguez Rodríguez, E. and Díaz Romero, C. (2008). Organic acid contents in onion cultivars (Allium cepa L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56 (15):6512–6519.Google Scholar
Sammis, T., Sharma, P., Shukla, M. K., Wang, J. and Miller, D. (2012). A water-balance drip-irrigation scheduling model. Agricultural Water Management 113:30–37.Google Scholar
Shock, C. C., Feibert, E. B. G. and Saunders, L. D. (1998). Onion yield and quality affected by soil water potential as irrigation threshold. Hortscience 33:1188–1191.Google Scholar
Shock, C. C., Feibert, E. B. G. and Saunders, L. D. (2000a). Onion storage decomposition unaffected by late-season irrigation reduction. HortTechnology 10 (1):176–178.Google Scholar
Shock, C. C., Feibert, E. B. G. and Saunders, L. D. (2000b). Irrigation criteria for drip-irrigated onions. HortScience 35:63–66.Google Scholar
Shock, C. C., Feibert, E. B. G. and Saunders, L. D. (2007). Short-duration water stress decreases onion single centers without causing translucent scale. HortScience 42 (6):1450–1455.Google Scholar
Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Raes, D. and Fereres, E. (2009). AquaCrop – the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. Agronomy Journal 101 (3):426–437.Google Scholar
Suojala, T. (2001). Effects of harvest date on onion yield in a northern climate. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 76 (6):664–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tei, F., Scaife, A. and Aikman, D. P. (1996). Growth of lettuce, onion, and red beet. 1. Growth analysis, light interception. Annals of Botany 78:633–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teviotdale, B. L., Davis, M. R., Guerard, J. P. and Harper, D. H. (1990). Method of irrigation affects sour skin rot of onion. California Agriculture 44:27–28.Google Scholar
Usha, K. and Singh, B. (2013). Potential applications of remote sensing in horticulture—a review. Scientia Horticulturae 153:71–83.Google Scholar
Viets, F. G. (1965). Increasing water use efficiency by soil management. In Plant Environment and Efficient Water Use, 259–274 (Eds Pierce, W. H. and Kirkham, D.). American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, USA.Google Scholar
Yutaka, S. and Makoto, N. (1997). Varietal differences and genetic improvements of bulb qualities in spring-sown onion. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 66 (2):339–345.Google Scholar