Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:54:43.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards the Reliable Prediction of Time to Flowering in Six Annual Crops. VI. Applications in Crop Improvement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

R. J. Lawn ,
R. J. Summerfield ,
R. H. Ellis ,
A. Qi ,
E. H. Roberts ,
P. M. Chay ,
J. B. Brouwer ,
J. L. Rose  and
S. J. Yeates
R. J. Lawn
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, The Cunningham Laboratory, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
R. J. Summerfield
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Reading RG2 9AD, England
R. H. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Reading RG2 9AD, England
A. Qi
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Reading RG2 9AD, England
E. H. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Reading RG2 9AD, England
P. M. Chay
Affiliation:
CSIRO Davies Laboratory, Private Mail Bag, PO Aitkenvale, Queensland 4814, Australia
J. B. Brouwer
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Private Bag 260, Natimuk Road, Horsham, Victoria 3401, Australia
J. L. Rose
Affiliation:
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Hermitage Research Station, via Warwick, Queensland 4370, Australia
S. J. Yeates
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, PO Box 1346, Katherine, Northern Territory 5780, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Variation in time from sowing to flowering (f) was examined for 44 cultivars of soyabean, mungbean, black gram, ricebean, cowpea, chickpea, lentil and barley, when grown in up to 21 diverse environments obtained by making one or more sowings at each of six locations spanning tropical, sub-tropical and temperate climates in Australia. The utility of simple linear models, relating rate of development (l/f) towards flowering to mean photoperiod and temperature prevailing between sowing and flowering, was evaluated. The models were highly efficient, explaining most (86.7%) of the variation observed across species, cultivars and environments. They were particularly efficient in describing responses where cultivars were relatively well-adapted, in agronomic terms, and least efficient where cultivars were exposed to unfavourable temperature and, to a lesser extent, photoperiod. Opportunities for exploiting the models in applied crop improvement include their use in interpretation of G × E interaction, genotypic characterization and selection of parental genotypes, selection of test environments, designing screening procedures, and more efficiently matching genotypes to target environments. The main strengths of these linear, additive rate models in crop improvement are their wide applicability across species and genotypes, their relative simplicity, and the requirement for few genotype-specific response parameters. Their main weakness is their lack of precision in describing responses when plants are exposed to unfavourable photothermal extremes, albeit in circumstances that are sometimes unrealistic for cropping those particular genotypes.

Predicciones del tiempo que ha de transcurrir hanta la floración. VI.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 89 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beech, D. F., Garside, A. L. & Wood, I. M. (1988). Response of soybeans to sowing date during the wet season in the Ord Irrigation Area, Western Australia. Australian journal of Experimental Agriculture 28:357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. H., Summerfield, R. J., Roberts, E. H. & Cooper, J. P. (1989). Environmental control of flowering in barley (Hordeum vulgare).III. Analysis of potential vernalization responses, and methods of screening germplasm for sensitivity to photoperiod and temperature. Annals of Botany 63:687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. H., Roberts, E. H., Summerfield, R. J. & Cooper, J. P. (1988). Environmental control of flowering in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).II. Rate of development as a function of temperature and photoperiod and its modification by low temperature vernalisation. Annals of Botany 62:145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. H., Lawn, R. J., Summerfield, R. J., Qi, A., Roberts, E. H., Chay, P. M., Brouwer, J. B., Rose, J. L. & Yeates, S. J. (1994 a). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops.III.Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Experimental Agriculture 30:17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. H., Lawn, R. J., Summerfield, R. J., Qi, A., Roberts, E. H., Chay, P. M., Brouwer, J. B., Rose, J. L., Yeates, S. J. & Sandover, S. (1994 b). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. IV. Cultivated and wild mung bean. Experimental Agriculture 30:31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. H., Lawn, R. J., Summerfield, R. J., Qi, A., Roberts, E. H., Chay, P. M., Brouwer, J. B., Rose, J. L., Yeates, S. J. & Sandover, S. (1994 c). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. V. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Experimental Agriculture 30:271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, W., Ellis, R. H., Summerfield, R. J., Roberts, E. H. & Hussain, A. (1990). Characterization of responses to temperature and photoperiod for time to flowering in a world lentil collection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80:193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P. M., Lawn, R. J. & Watkinson, A. R. (1992). Use of linear models to predict flowering in subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43:1547–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodspeed, M. J. (1975). Computer routines for solar position, daylength and related quantities. CSIRO Division of Land Use Research Technical Memorandum 75/11.Google Scholar
Grimm, S. S., Jones, J. W., Boote, K. J. & Hesketh, J. D. (1993). Parameter estimation for predicting flowering date of soybean cultivars. Crop Science 33:137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadley, P., Roberts, E. H., Summerfield, R. J. & Minchin, F. R. (1983). A quantitative model of reproductive development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). in relation to photoperiod and temperature and implications for screening germplasm. Annals of Botany 51:531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadley, P., Roberts, E. H., Summerfield, R. J. & Minchin, F. R. (1984). Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in soyabean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill.). Annals of Botany 53:669–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imrie, B. C. & Lawn, R. J. (1990). Time to flowering of mungbean (Vigna radiata) genotypes and their hybrids in response to photoperiod and temperature. Experimental Agriculture 26:307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawn, R. J. (1979). Agronomic studies on Vigna spp. in south-eastern Queensland. I. Phenological response of cultivars to sowing date. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30:855–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawn, R. J. & Imrie, B. C. (1991). Crop improvement for tropical and subtropical Australia: Designing plants for difficult climates. Field Crops Research 26:113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawn, R. J. & Imrie, B. C. (1993). Exploiting physiological understanding in crop improvement. In Focused Plant Improvement: Towards Responsible and Sustainable Agriculture. Proceedings, Tenth Australian Plant Breeding Conference (Eds Imrie, B. C. and Hacker, J. B.), 136–146. Canberra, ACT: Organising Committee, Australian Convention and Travel Service.Google Scholar
Loss, S. P., Perry, M. W. & Anderson, W. K. (1990). Flowering times of wheat in South-western Australia: a modelling approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41:213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayers, J. D., Lawn, R. J. & Byth, D. E. (1991 a). Adaptation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] to the dry season of the tropics. I. Genotypic and environmental effects on phenology. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42:497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayers, J. D., Lawn, R. J. & Byth, D. E. (1991 b). Agronomic studies on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] in the dry season of the tropics. I. Limits to yield imposed by phenology. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42:1075–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayers, J. D., Lawn, R. J. & Byth, D. E. (1991 c). Agronomic studies on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] in the dry season of the tropics. II. Interaction of sowing date and sowing density. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42:1093–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passioura, J. B. (1973). Sense and nonsense in crop simulation. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 39:181–183.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. H. & Summerfield, R. J. (1987). Measurement and prediction of flowering in annual crops. In Manipulation of Flowering, 17–50 (Ed. Atherton, J. G.). London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E. H., Summerfield, R. J., Ellis, R. H. & Qi, A. (1993). Adaptation of flowering in crops to climate. Outlook on Agriculture 22:105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorter, R. S., Lawn, R. J. & Hammer, G. L. (1991). Improving genotypic adaptation in crops-a role for breeders, physiologists and modellers. Experimental Agriculture 27:155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Roberts, E. H., Erskine, W. & Ellis, R. H. (1985). Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in lentils (Lens culinaris Medic.). Annals of Botany 56:659–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Roberts, E. H., Ellis, R. H. & Lawn, R. J. (1991). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. I. The development of simple models for fluctuating field environments. Experimental Agriculture 27:11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Lawn, R. J., Qi, A., Ellis, R. H., Roberts, E. H., Chay, P. M., Brouwer, J. B., Rose, J. L., Shanmugasundaram, S., Yeates, S. J. & Sandover, S. (1993). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. II. Soyabean (Glycine max). Experimental Agriculture 29:253–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyay, A. P., Ellis, R. H., Summerfield, R. J., Roberts, E. H. and Qi, A. (1994). Characterization of photothermal responses in maturity isolines of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] cv. Clark. Annals of Botany 74:87–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed