Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:49:59.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SOIL AND PLANT SILICON STATUS IN OIL PALM CROPS IN COLOMBIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2014

F. MUNEVAR M.*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación en Palma de Aceite, CENIPALMA, Calle 21 No. 42-55, Bogotá, Colombia, South America
A. ROMERO F.
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación en Palma de Aceite, CENIPALMA, Calle 21 No. 42-55, Bogotá, Colombia, South America
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Summary

A study was conducted, including 17 oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) crops distributed throughout Colombia, to determine how much silicon (Si) this plant species accumulates in their leaves, and also to determine the available Si levels in the soils. The study was conceived as a preliminary step of a research project aimed at determining whether the beneficial effects of Si, which have been identified for other species also, occur in the oil palm crop. Available Si varied among soils; lower levels were found in the soils with characteristics associated with greater weathering as compared with less weathered soils. Relatively high leaf Si levels were found in all of the sites studied and this was interpreted as an indication that oil palm could be considered a Si accumulator. An increase in Si concentration with leaf age was found, indicating that this element probably behaves as a non-mobile element in the plant. A defined relationship between soil available Si and Si concentration in the leaves was not found, however. The results indicate that it is worthwhile conducting specific studies to determine the effects of Si on oil palm growth and behaviour, and provide useful criteria for the design of future studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. (1996). The Nature and Properties of Soils, 11th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Brown, P. H. and Hu, H. (1998). Boron mobility and consequent management in different crops. Better Crops with Plant Food 82 (2):2831.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. (1999). Silicon. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 50:641664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, E. (2001). Silicon in plants: facts vs. concepts. In Silicon in Agriculture, 115 (Eds Datnoff, L. E., Snyder, G. H. and Korndörfer, G. H.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fauteux, F., Rémus-Borel, W., Menzies, J. G. and Bélanger, R. R. (2005). Silicon and plant disease resistance against pathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiology Letters 249:16.Google Scholar
Foster, H. (2003). Assessment of oil palm fertilizer requirements. In Oil Palm Management for Large and Sustainable Yields, 231257 (Eds Fairhurst, T. and Härdter, R.). Atlanta, GA: Potash and Phosphate Institute.Google Scholar
Korndörfer, G. H. and Lepsch, I. (2001). Effect of silicon on plant growth and crop yield. In Silicon in Agriculture, 133147 (Eds Datnoff, L. E., Snyder, G. H. and Korndörfer, G. H.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Law, K. N., Daud, W. R. W. and Ghazali, A. (2007). Morphological and chemical nature of fiber strands of oil palm empty-fruit-bunch (opefb). Bioresources 2:351362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Sun, W., Zhu, Y. G. and Christie, P. (2007). Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of biotic stresses in higher plants: a review. Environmental Pollution 114:422428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, J. F. and Yamaji, N. (2006). Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends in Plant Science 11:392397.Google Scholar
Ma, J. F. and Takahashi, E. (2002). Soil, Fertilizer, and Plant Silicon Research in Japan. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Marschner, H. (1995). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd edn. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Munévar, M. F. and Franco, P. N. (2002). Guía general para el muestreo foliar y de suelos en cultivos de palma de aceite. Boletín Técnico No. 12, 2nd edn. Bogotá, Colombia: Cenipalma.Google Scholar
Munévar, F., Romero F., A., Cristancho R., J. A. and Arias A., N. A. 2005. Variación de las concentraciones foliares de nutrientes según la edad fisiológica de las hojas de la palma de aceite en dos localidades de Colombia. Palmas (Colombia) 26 (3):2333.Google Scholar
Ng, S. K., von Uexküll, H. and Härdter, R. (2003). Botanical aspects of the oil palm relevant to crop management. In Oil Palm Management for Large and Sustainable Yields, 1324 (Eds Fairhurst, T. and Härdter, R.). Atlanta, GA: Potash and Phosphate Institute.Google Scholar
Richmond, K. E. and Sussman, M. (2003). Got silicon? The non-essential beneficial plant nutrient. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6:268272.Google Scholar
Romero-Aranda, M. R., Jurado, O. and Cuartero, J. (2006). Silicon alleviates the deleterious salt effect on tomato plant growth by improving plant water status. Journal of Plant Physiology 163:847855.Google Scholar
Savant, N. K., Korndörfer, G. H., Datnoff, L. E. and Snyder, G. H. (1999). Silicon nutrition and sugar cane production: a review. Journal of Plant Nutrition 22:18531903.Google Scholar
Savant, N. K., Snyder, G. H. and Datnoff, L. E. (1997). Silicon management and sustainable rice production. Advances in Agronomy 58:151199.Google Scholar
Snyder, G. H. (2001). Methods for silicon analysis in plants, soils, and fertilizers. In Silicon in Agriculture, 185196 (Eds Datnoff, L. E., Snyder, G. H. and Korndörfer, G. H.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walinga, I., van Vark, W., Houba, V. and van der Lee, J. (1989). Plant Analysis Procedures. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition.Google Scholar