Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:25:49.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Significance of the Coupling between Saturation Vapour Pressure Deficit and Rainfall in Monsoon Climates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

J. L. Monteith
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Terrestrial Physics, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA

Summary

In monsoon climates, the mean daytime saturation vapour pressure deficit (D), measured at screen height, decreases from a maximum of 3–4 kPa attained several months before rain arrives to a minimum of 0.5–1 kPa in the month of highest rainfall. Climatic records from India and West Africa were analysed to give the relation between D and precipitation (P mm month−1) as:

where n ranged from 0.5 to 0.9 between stations.

The dependence of dry matter production on D and therefore on P is evaluated when growth is restricted by rain and when this restriction is removed by irrigation. In the first case, the decrease in demand for water associated with a decrease in D is comparable in importance with the increase of water supply (P). The analysis has implications for the marginal response of crops to supplemental irrigation and for the interpretation of experiments with a line-source or rain-shelter.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bierhuizen, J. F. & Slatyer, R. O. (1965). Effects of atmospheric concentration of water vapour and CO2 in determining transpiration photosynthesis relationships. Agricultural Meteorology 2:259270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhury, B. J. & Monteith, J. L. (1986). Saturation deficit, stomatal response and the heat balance of vegetation. Agricultural Meteorology 36:215225.Google Scholar
Davenport, D. C. & Hudson, J. P. (1967). Changes in evaporation rates along a 17 km transect in the Sudan Gezira. Agricultural Meteorology 4:339352.Google Scholar
El-Sharkawy, M. A., Cock, J. H. & Held, A. A. H. (1984). Water use efficiency of cassava: II differing sensitivity of stomata to air humidity in cassava and other warm-climate species. Crop Science 24:503507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. J. (1984). Water availability and crop growth in arid regions. Outlook on Agriculture 13:208215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. F. (1972). Nigeria. Semi-arid zones. In World Survey of Climatology, Vol. 10, Chapters 5 and 6 (Ed. Griffiths, J. F.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1986). How do plants manipulate water supply and demand? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A316:245259.Google Scholar
Morison, J. & Gifford, R. M. (1983). Stomatal sensitivity to carbon dioxide and humidity. Plant Physiology 71:789796.Google Scholar
Rao, Y. P. (1981). The climate of the Indian sub-continent. In World Survey of Climatology, Vol. 9, Chapter 2 (Eds Takahashi, K. & Arakawa, H.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Schulze, E. D. & Hall, A. E. (1982). Stomatal responses, water loss and CO2 assimilation rates of plants. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Vol. 12B (Ed. Lange, O. L. et al. ) Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tanner, C. B. (1981). Transpiration efficiency of potato. Agronomy Journal 73:5964.Google Scholar
Tanner, C. B. & Sinclair, T. R. (1983). Efficient water use in crop production. In Limitations to Efficient Water Use, 1–27. (Eds Taylor, H. H., Jordan, W. R. & Sinclair, T. R.). Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar