Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:17:52.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Pearl Millet Cultivars to Inoculation with Nitrogen-fixing Bacteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

S. P. Wani
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
S. Chandrapalaiah
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
P. J. Dart
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India

Summary

The results of field experiments conducted with millet cultivars inoculated with different nitrogen-fixing bacteria at the ICRISAT Centre, Hyderabad, India are described. Significant interactions were observed between host cultivars and bacterial strains, but some cultivars showed consistently increased grain and dry matter yields, suggesting the possibility of exploiting suitable plant and nitrogen-fixing bacterial associations for increasing grain yield. Inoculation also resulted in increased nitrogen uptake up to 14.9 kg ha−1, and larger grain nitrogen contents.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baltensperger, A. A., Schank, S. C., Smith, R. L., Littell, R. C., Bouton, J. H. & Dudeck, A. E. (1978). Effect of inoculation with Azospirillum and Azotobacter on Turf type Bermuda genotypes. Crop Science 18:10431045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton, J. H., Smith, R. L., Schank, S. C, Burton, G. W., Tyler, M. E., Littell, R. C, Gallaher, R. N. & Quesenberry, K. H. (1979). Response of pearl millet inbreds and hybrids to inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense. Crop Science 19:1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. E. (1974). Seed and root bacterization. Annual Review of Phytopathology 12:181197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E., Okon, Y., Kigel, J., Nur, I. & Henis, Y. (1980). Increase in dry weight and total nitrogen content in Zea mays and Setaria italica associated with nitrogen fixing Azospirillum spp. Plant Physiology 66:746749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dart, P. J. & Wani, S. P. (1982). Non-symbiotic nitrogen fixation and soil fertility. In Non-symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation and Organic Matter in the Tropics. Transactions of the 12th International Congress of Soil Science,New Delhi, India,8–16 February 1982. Symposia papers 1:3–27.Google Scholar
Dobereiner, J. (1976). Plant genotype effects on nitrogen fixation in grasses. In Genetic Diversity in Plants, 325334 (Eds Muhammed, A., Akses, R., & Von Borstel, R. C.).Google Scholar
Kapulnik, Y., Sarig, S., Nur, I., Okon, Y., Kigel, J. & Henis, Y. (1981). Yield increases in summer cereal crops of Israel in fields inoculated with Azospirillum. Experimental Agriculture 17:171178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyra, C. A., Dobereiner, J., Lalande, R. & Knowles, R. (1977). Denitrification by N2-fixing Spirillum lipoferum. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 23:300305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okon, Y. (1982). Azospirillum: Physiological properties, mode of association with roots and its application for the benefit of cereal and forage grass crops. Israel Journal of Botany 31:214220.Google Scholar
Smith, R. L., Bouton, J. H., Schank, S. C, Quesenberry, K. H., Tyler, H. E., Milam, J. R, Gaskins, M. H. & Littell, R. C. (1976). Nitrogen fixation in grasses inoculated with Spirillum lipoferum. Science 193:10031005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subba Rao, N. S., Tilak, K. V. B. R., Singh, C. S. & Gautam, R. C. (1982). Crop yield and nitrogen content of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum) in response to Azospirillum brasilense. In Biological Nitrogen Fixation – Proceedings of the National Symposium held at Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Bombay, 507576.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. W. (1979). Response of two grasses to inoculation with Azospirillum spp. in a Bahamian Soil. Tropical Agriculture 56:361365.Google Scholar
Tien, T., Gaskins, M. H. & Hubbell, D. M. (1979). Plant growth substances produced by Azospirillum brasilense and their effect on the growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) Applied and Environmental Microbiology 37:10161024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venkateswarlu, B. & Rao, A. V. (1983). Response of pearl millet to inoculation with different strains of Azospirillum brasilense. Plant and Soil 74:379386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wani, S. P., Dart, P. J. & Upadhyaya, M. N. (1983). Factors affecting nitrogenase activity (C2H2 reduction) associated with sorghum and millet estimated using the soil core assay. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 29:10631069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wani, S. P., Shinde, P. A. & Konde, B. K. (1976). Response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to Azotobacter inoculation. Current Research 5:209210.Google Scholar
Wani, S. P., Upadhyaya, M. N. & Dart, P. J. (1984). An intact plant assay for estimating nitrogenase activity (C2H2 reduction) of sorghum and millet plants grown in pots. Plant and Soil 82:1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, L. V., Klucas, R. V. & Shearman, R. C. (1981). Nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) by Klebsiella pneumoniae in association with ‘park’ Kentucky blue grass (Poa pratensis L.). Canadian Journal of Microbiology 27:5256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. F. & Weaver, R. W. (1982). Inoculation of forage grasses with N2-fixing Enterobacteriaceae. Plant and Soil 65:415419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar