Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:03:32.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESISTANCE OF SACCHARUM SPP. AGAINST CHILO SACCHARIPHAGUS INDICUS (KAPUR) (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) IN INDIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2016

P. MAHESH ,
J. SRIKANTH ,
K. CHANDRAN  and
B. SINGARAVELU
P. MAHESH*
Affiliation:
Section of Entomology, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, Tamil Nadu, India
J. SRIKANTH
Affiliation:
Section of Entomology, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, Tamil Nadu, India
K. CHANDRAN
Affiliation:
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute Research Center, Kannur 670002, Kerala, India
B. SINGARAVELU
Affiliation:
Section of Entomology, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, Tamil Nadu, India
*
§Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Accessions of four Saccharum spp. from the world collection of sugarcane germplasm maintained at the ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute Research Center, Kannur, Kerala State, India, were screened against Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (Kapur) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), commonly known as internode borer. Observations on the progression of borer attack in the most susceptible Saccharum officinarum indicated that the incidence began in the first fortnight of July, increased in the next 2 months and reached its peak in September. Thereafter, the incidence decreased in the next 2 months but reached its overall peak in December. Simple correlation coefficients between mean monthly weather parameters and borer incidence were not significant. Percent of canes attacked was significantly lower in 2011 than in 2012 for S. officinarum, Saccharum barberi and Saccharum sinense but did not differ between the years for Saccharum robustum. Amongst the four Saccharum spp., S. robustum showed the lowest borer incidence whereas S. officinarum recorded the lowest attack intensity. Whilst infestation index showed the same trend as percent canes attacked, percent deadhearts did not differ amongst the four Saccharum spp. Considering the 171 accessions evaluated, 29 (16.9%) accessions were resistant, 39 (22.8%) moderately resistant and 103 (60.2%) susceptible to internode borer. Out of the 39 accessions of S. officinarum, none occupied the resistant category whereas 17.9% were in the moderately resistant category. In S. robustum, whilst nearly half (44.5%) the accessions emerged as resistant, a considerable number occupied the moderately resistant category. In S. barberi, no accession was resistant to the borer. In S. sinense, only one accession each represented resistant and moderately resistant categories. Plant morphological characters, yield and quality parameters did not show clear-cut relationship with the three infestation parameters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 83 - 95
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, S., Thirumalai, M., Krishnamurthi, M., Ramya, M., Lourdusamy, A. and Gopinathan, M. C. (2007). Evaluation of tolerance and susceptibility against internode borer of sugarcane. Sugar Tech 9 (4):308–311.Google Scholar
Ananthanarayana, K. and David, H. (1986). Chemical control. In Sugarcane Entomology in India, 423–435 (Eds David, H., Easwaramoorthy, S. and Jayanthi, R.). Coimbatore, India: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2008). ICAR – SBI Annual Report, 103. Coimbatore: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.Google Scholar
Artschwager, E. and Brandes, E. W. (1958). Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.): Origin, classification, characteristics and descriptions of representative clones. United States Department of Agriculture Handbook. No. 122, 307 p.Google Scholar
Bessin, R. T., Reagan, T. E. and Martin, F. A. (1990). A moth production index for evaluating sugarcane cultivars for resistance to the sugarcane borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 83:221–225.Google Scholar
Coburn, G. E. and Hensley, S. D. (1972). Differential survival of Diatraea saccharalis (F.) larvae on 2 varieties of sugarcane. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Cane Technologists 14, 440–444.Google Scholar
David, H. (1986). The internode borer, Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (Kapur). In Sugarcane Entomology in India, 121–134 (Eds David, H., Easwaramoorthy, S. and Jayanthi, R.). Coimbatore, India: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.Google Scholar
David, H. and Nandagopal, V. (1986). Pests of sugarcane – distribution, symptomology of attack and identification. In Sugarcane Entomology in India, 1–29 (Eds David, H., Easwaramoorthy, S. and Jayanthi, R.). Coimbatore, India: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.Google Scholar
Jayanthi, R. (1988). Evaluation of Saccharum clones for resistance to the sugarcane internode borer. Sugar Cane Spring suppl, 17–18.Google Scholar
Korowi, K. T. and Samson, P. R. (2013). Screening for borer resistance among sugarcane clones in Papua New Guinea, 2010–2012. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 35, 1–9.Google Scholar
Korowi, K. T., Samson, P. R. and Kuniata, L. S. (2011). Screening for borer resistance among sugarcane varieties in Papua New Guinea, 2003–2008. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 33, (electronic format) 9 pp.Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Singh, A. K., Singh, A. P., Singh, S. K. and Singh, R. R. (2002). Response of sugarcane world germplasm against shoot borer, Chilo infescatellus (Snellen) infestation. Cooperative Sugar 34 (2):131–134.Google Scholar
Mahesh, P., Chandran, K., Srikanth, J., Nisha, M. and Manjunatha, T. (2013). Natural incidence of Sesamia inferens Walker, in sugarcane germplasm. Sugar Tech 15 (4):384–389.Google Scholar
Mahesh, P., Srikanth, J. and Chandran, K. (2014). Pattern of pink stem borer Sesamia inferens (Walker) incidence in different crop seasons and Saccharum spp. Journal of Sugarcane Research 4 (1):91–95.Google Scholar
Mahesh, P., Srikanth, J., Chandran, K. and Nisha, M. (2015a). Damage pattern and status of the leaf miner Aphanisticus aeneus Kerremans (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Saccharum spp. International Journal of Pest Management 61 (1):36–46.Google Scholar
Mahesh, P., Srikanth, J., Chandran, K. and Nisha, M. (2015b). Preliminary screening of Saccharum spp. germplasm against pink borer Sesamia inferens Walker. International Sugar Journal CXVII (1395):212–215.Google Scholar
Mukunthan, N. (2001). Reaction of Erianthus to sugarcane pests. In Catalogue on Sugarcane Genetic Resources- IV. Erianthus species, 73 (Eds Sreenivasan, T. V., Amalraj, V. A., and William Jebadas, A.). Coimbatore, India: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.Google Scholar
Mukunthan, N. (2006). Efficacy of inundative release of Trichogramma chilonis in the management of the sugarcane internode borer, Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (K.). Sugar Tech 8 (1):36–43.Google Scholar
Mukunthan, N. and Rakkiyappan, P. (1989). Bunchy top formation in sugar cane caused by the internode borer and its effect on yield and quality. Sugar Cane 2:17–19.Google Scholar
Nair, N. V. (2011). Sugarcane varietal development programmes in India: an overview. Sugar Tech 13 (4):275–280.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. K., Karuppaiyan, R., Singaravelu, B., Ravinder, K., Meena, M. R., Bakshi, R. and Chhabra, N. N. V. (2014). Reaction of sub-tropical, foreign and wild genome intergressed hybrids against stalk borer, Chilo auricious Dudgeon. Vegetos 27 (3):221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radadia, G. G. and Shinde, C. U. (2013). Research methodology for recording observations of sugarcane pests, 35 p. Lucknow, India: AICRP on Sugarcane, Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research.Google Scholar
Reay-Jones, F. P. F., Way, M. O., Sétamou, M., Legendre, B. L. and Reagan, T. E. (2003). Resistance to the Mexican rice borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) among Louisiana and Texas sugarcane cultivars. Journal of Economic Entomology 96:1929–1934.Google Scholar
Showler, A. and Moran, P. J. (2014). Associations between host plant concentrations of selected biochemical nutrients and Mexican rice borer, Eoreuma loftini, infestation. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 151 (2):135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srikanth, J., Easwaramoorthy, S., Shanmugasundaram, M. and Kumar, R. (1999). Seasonal fluctuations of Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) parasitism in borers of sugarcane and sorghum in Coimbatore, south India. Insect Science and its Application 19 (1):65–74.Google Scholar
Srikanth, J. and Kurup, N. K. (2011). Damage pattern of sugarcane internode borer Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (Kapur) in Tamil Nadu State, southern India. International Sugar Journal 113 (1352):590–594.Google Scholar
Srikanth, J., Sivaraman, K., Kurup, N. K., Chandrasekhar, S. D., Sundara, B. and Rakkiyappan, P. (2013). Pest scenario in long-term organic and conventional sugarcane production systems. Journal of Sugarcane Research 3 (1):47–61.Google Scholar
Stat SOFT (2004). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. Available from: www.statsoft.com.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. E., VanWeelden, M. T., Beuzelin, J. M., Reagan, T. E., Way, M. O., White, W. H., Wilson, L. T. and Showler, A. T. (2015). A relative resistance ratio for evaluation of Mexican rice borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) susceptibility among sugarcane cultivars. Jounal of Economic Entomoology 108 (3):1363–1370.Google Scholar
Yalawar, S., Pradeep, S., Ajith Kumar, M. A., Hosamani, V. and Rampure, S. (2010). Biology of sugarcane internode borer, Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (Kapur). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 23 (1):140–141.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mahesh supplementary material

Supplementary Figures and Tables

Download Mahesh supplementary material(File)
File 5.5 MB